Targeting Moderate and Severe Male Stress Urinary Incontinence With Adjustable Male Slings and the Perineal Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Focus on Perioperative Complications and Device Explantations
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To analyze perioperative complications and postoperative explantation rates for selected readjustable male sling systems and the perineal single-cuff artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) in a large, contemporary, multi-institutional patient cohort. Methods: Two hundred eighty-two male patients who underwent implantation between 2010 and 2012 in 13 participating institutions were included in the study (n=127 adjustable male sling [n=95 Argus classic, n=32 Argus T], n=155 AUS). Perioperative characteristics and postoperative complications were analyzed. The explantation rates of the respective devices were assessed using the Fisher exact test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. A Kaplan-Meier curve was generated. Potential features associated with device explantation were analyzed using a multiple logistic regression model (P<0.05). Results: We found significantly increased intraoperative complication rates after adjustable male sling implantation (15.9% [adjustable male sling] vs. 4.2% [AUS], P=0.003). The most frequent intraoperative complication was bladder perforation (n=17). Postoperative infection rates did not vary significantly between the respective devices (P=0.378). Device explantation rates were significantly higher after AUS implantation (9.7% [adjustable male sling] vs. 21.5% [AUS], P=0.030). In multivariate analysis, postoperative infection was a strong independent predictor of decreased device survival (odds ratio, 6.556; P=0.001). Conclusions: Complication profiles vary between adjustable male slings and AUS. Explantation rates are lower after adjustable male sling implantation. Any kind of postoperative infections are independent predictors of decreased device survival. There is no significant effect of the experience of the implanting institution on device survival.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze perioperative complications and postoperative explantation rates for selected readjustable male sling systems and the perineal single-cuff artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) in a large, contemporary, multi-institutional patient cohort. Methods: Two hundred eighty-two male patients who underwent implantation between 2010 and 2012 in 13 participating institutions were included in the study (n=127 adjustable male sling [n=95 Argus classic, n=32 Argus T], n=155 AUS). Perioperative characteristics and postoperative complications were analyzed. The explantation rates of the respective devices were assessed using the Fisher exact test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. A Kaplan-Meier curve was generated. Potential features associated with device explantation were analyzed using a multiple logistic regression model (P<0.05). Results: We found significantly increased intraoperative complication rates after adjustable male sling implantation (15.9% [adjustable male sling] vs. 4.2% [AUS], P=0.003). The most frequent intraoperative complication was bladder perforation (n=17). Postoperative infection rates did not vary significantly between the respective devices (P=0.378). Device explantation rates were significantly higher after AUS implantation (9.7% [adjustable male sling] vs. 21.5% [AUS], P=0.030). In multivariate analysis, postoperative infection was a strong independent predictor of decreased device survival (odds ratio, 6.556; P=0.001). Conclusions: Complication profiles vary between adjustable male slings and AUS. Explantation rates are lower after adjustable male sling implantation. Any kind of postoperative infections are independent predictors of decreased device survival. There is no significant effect of the experience of the implanting institution on device survival.
참고문헌 (18)
- Lucas MG, "EAU guidelines on assessment and nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence", Eur Urol, 62, pp.1130~1142 (2012)
- Lucas MG, "EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence", Eur Urol, 62, pp.1118~1129 (2012)
- Herschorn S, "The artificial urinary sphincter is the treatment of choice for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence", Can Urol Assoc J, 2, pp.536~539 (2008)
- Kretschmer A, "Evaluation and management of postprostatectomy incontinence : a systematic review of current literature", Eur Urol Focus, 2, pp.245~259 (2016)
- Van der Aa F, "The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century : a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence", Eur Urol, 63, pp.681~689 (2013)
- Raj GV, "Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter", J Urol, 173, pp.1242~1245 (2005)
- Elliott DS, "Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter : a review of 323 cases", J Urol, 159, pp.1206~1208 (1998)
- Lai HH, "13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine", J Urol, 177, pp.1021~1025 (2007)
- Kumar A, "Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence--what do patients choose?", J Urol, 181, pp.1231~1235 (2009)
- Romano SV, "An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy : a phase III multicentre trial", BJU Int, 97, pp.533~539 (2006)
- Bauer RM, "Efficacy and complications of the adjustable sling system ArgusT for male incontinence : results of a prospective 2-center study", Urology, 85, pp.316~320 (2015)
- Bauer RM, "Impact of the ‘repositioning test’ on postoperative outcome of retroluminar transobturator male sling implantation", Urol Int, 90, pp.334~338 (2013)
- Bochove-Overgaauw DM, "An adjustable sling for the treatment of all degrees of male stress urinary incontinence : retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications after a minimal followup of 14 months", J Urol, 185, pp.1363~1368 (2011)
- Cox A, "Management of the incontinent patient with a sphincteric stricture following radical prostatectomy", Curr Opin Urol, 24, pp.578~585 (2014)
- Anger JT, "Anastomotic contracture and incontinence after radical prostatectomy : a graded approach to management", J Urol, 173, pp.1143~1146 (2005)
- Mark S, "Synchronous management of anastomotic contracture and stress urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy", J Urol, 151, pp.1202~1204 (1994)
- Dalpiaz O, "Mid-term complications after placement of the male adjustable suburethral sling : a single center experience", J Urol, 186, pp.604~609 (2011)
- Sandhu JS, "The surgical learning curve for artificial urinary sphincter procedures compared to typical surgeon experience", Eur Urol, 60, pp.1285~1290 (2011)