Sling Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence Including Post Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Challenge to the Urologist
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The management of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) is still challenging for urologists. In recent decades, various kinds of male sling system have been developed and introduced; however, they have not yet shown as good a result as that of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). However, a male sling is still in an important position because patients have a high demand for sling implantation, and it can allow the avoidance of the use of mechanical devices like AUS. Recently, the male sling has been widely used in mild-to-moderate PPI patients; however, there are no studies that compare individual devices. Thus, it is hard to directly compare the success rate of operation, and it is impossible to judge which sling system is more excellent. It is expected that many sling options will be available in addition to AUS in the near future with the technological development of various male slings and the accumulation of long-term surgical outcomes. In that in patients with PPI, sling implantation is an option that must be explained rather than an option that need not be explained to them, this review would share the latest outcomes and complications.
Abstract
The management of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) is still challenging for urologists. In recent decades, various kinds of male sling system have been developed and introduced; however, they have not yet shown as good a result as that of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). However, a male sling is still in an important position because patients have a high demand for sling implantation, and it can allow the avoidance of the use of mechanical devices like AUS. Recently, the male sling has been widely used in mild-to-moderate PPI patients; however, there are no studies that compare individual devices. Thus, it is hard to directly compare the success rate of operation, and it is impossible to judge which sling system is more excellent. It is expected that many sling options will be available in addition to AUS in the near future with the technological development of various male slings and the accumulation of long-term surgical outcomes. In that in patients with PPI, sling implantation is an option that must be explained rather than an option that need not be explained to them, this review would share the latest outcomes and complications.
참고문헌 (44)
- Ficarra V, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy", Eur Urol, 62, pp.405~417 (2012)
- Crivellaro S, "Systematic review of surgical treatment of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence", Neurourol Urodyn, 35, pp.875~881 (2016)
- Kaufman JJ, "Urethral compression operations for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence", J Urol, 110, pp.93~96 (1973)
- Schaeffer AJ, "The male bulbourethral sling procedure for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence", J Urol, 159, pp.1510~1515 (1998)
- Chong JT, "A historical perspective and evolution of the treatment of male urinary incontinence", Neurourol Urodyn, 37, pp.1169~1175 (2018)
- Cornu JN, "The AdVance transobturator male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence : clinical results of a prospective evaluation after a minimum follow-up of 6 months", Eur Urol, 56, pp.923~927 (2009)
- Rehder P, "The 1 year outcome of the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence", BJU Int, 106, pp.1668~1672 (2010)
- Bauer RM, "Results of the AdVance transobturator male sling after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy", Urology, 77, pp.474~479 (2011)
- Cornu JN, "Midterm evaluation of the transobturator male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence : focus on prognostic factors", BJU Int, 108, pp.236~240 (2011)
- Soljanik I, "Urodynamic parameters after retrourethral transobturator male sling and their influence on outcome", Urology, 78, pp.708~712 (2011)
- Rehder P, "Treatment of postprostatectomy male urinary incontinence with the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension : 3-year followup", Eur Urol, 62, pp.140~145 (2012)
- Soljanik I, "Risk factors of treatment failure after retrourethral transobturator male sling", World J Urol, 30, pp.201~206 (2012)
- Collado Serra A, "AdVance", Ad-Vance XP transobturator male slings : preoperative degree of incontinence as predictor of surgical outcome, 2013, pp.81, 1034~1039
- Torrey R, "Radiation history affects continence outcomes after advance transobturator sling placement in patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence", Urology, 82, pp.713~717 (2013)
- Bauer RM, "AdVance and Ad-Vance XP slings for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence", World J Urol, 33, pp.145~150 (2015)
- Kowalik CG, "The advance transobturator male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence : subjective and objective outcomes with 3 years follow up", Neurourol Urodyn, 34, pp.251~254 (2015)
- Habashy D, "Mid-term outcomes of a male retro-urethral, transobturator synthetic sling for treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence : impact of radiotherapy and storage dysfunction", Neurourol Urodyn, 36, pp.1147~1150 (2017)
- Hüsch T, "The AdVance and AdVanceXP male sling in urinary incontinence : is there a difference?", World J Urol, 36, pp.1657~1662 (2018)
- Zuckerman JM, "Extended outcomes in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence with a transobturator sling", Urology, 83, pp.939~945 (2014)
- Davies TO, "Urodynamic changes and initial results of the AdVance male sling", Urology, 74, pp.354~357 (2009)
- Suskind AM, "Patient-perceived outcomes of the AdVance sling up to 40 months post procedure", Neurourol Urodyn, 30, pp.1267~1270 (2011)
- Bauer RM, "36-month data for the AdVance XP® male sling : results of a prospective multicentre study", BJU Int, 119, pp.626~630 (2017)
- Grise P, "Transobturator male sling TOMS for the treatment of stress post-prostatectomy incontinence, initial experience and results with one year’s experience", Int Braz J Urol, 35, pp.706~713 (2009)
- Yiou R, "Evaluation of urinary symptoms in patients with postprostatectomy urinary incontinence treated with the male sling TOMS", Neurourol Urodyn, 34, pp.12~17 (2015)
- Yiou R, "Update on 2-year outcomes of the TOMSTM transobturator male sling for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence", Neurourol Urodyn, 35, pp.44~47 (2016)
- Grise P, "I-STOP TOMS transobturator male sling, a minimally invasive treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence : continence improvement and tolerability", Urology, 79, pp.458~463 (2012)
- Malval B, "Long-term outcomes of I-Stop TOMSTM male sling implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence management", Prog Urol, 27, pp.1084~1090 (2017)
- Galiano M, "Superficial implantation of the I-Stop TOMS transobturator sling in the treatment of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence : description of a novel technique and 1-year outcomes", Urology, 90, pp.195~198 (2016)
- Comiter CV, "A new quadratic sling for male stress incontinence : retrograde leak point pressure as a measure of urethral resistance", J Urol, 187, pp.563~568 (2012)
- Comiter CV, "The virtue sling--a new quadratic sling for postprostatectomy incontinence--results of a multinational clinical trial", Urology, 84, pp.433~438 (2014)
- McCall AN, "Long-term follow-up of the virtue quadratic male sling", Urology, 93, pp.213~216 (2016)
- Romano SV, "An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy : a phase III multicentre trial", BJU Int, 97, pp.533~539 (2006)
- Hübner WA, "Adjustable bulbourethral male sling : experience after 101 cases of moderate-tosevere male stress urinary incontinence", BJU Int, 107, pp.777~782 (2011)
- Bochove-Overgaauw DM, "An adjustable sling for the treatment of all degrees of male stress urinary incontinence : retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications after a minimal followup of 14 months", J Urol, 185, pp.1363~1368 (2011)
- Dalpiaz O, "Mid-term complications after placement of the male adjustable suburethral sling : a single center experience", J Urol, 186, pp.604~609 (2011)
- Romano SV, "A transobturator adjustable system for male incontinence : 30-month follow-up of a multicenter study", Int Braz J Urol, 40, pp.781~789 (2014)
- Bauer RM, "Efficacy and complications of the adjustable sling system ArgusT for male incontinence : results of a prospective 2-center study", Urology, 85, pp.316~320 (2015)
- Seweryn J, "Initial experience and results with a new adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence", J Urol, 187, pp.956~961 (2012)
- Hoda MR, "Early results of a European multicentre experience with a new self-anchoring adjustable transobturator system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men", BJU Int, 111, pp.296~303 (2013)
- Friedl A, "Long-term outcome of the adjustable transobturator male system(ATOMS) : results of a European multicentre study", BJU Int, 119, pp.785~792 (2017)
- Sousa-Escandón A, "Adjustable suburethral sling(male remeex system)in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence : a multicentric European study", Eur Urol, 52, pp.1473~1479 (2007)
- Navalón-Monllor V, "Long-term follow-up for the treatment of male urinary incontinence with the Remeex system", Actas Urol Esp, 40, pp.585~591 (2016)
- Bauer RM, "Impact of the ‘repositioning test’ on postoperative outcome of retroluminar transobturator male sling implantation", Urol Int, 90, pp.334~338 (2013)
- Bauer RM, "Prospective evaluation of the functional sling suspension for male postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence : results after 1 year", Eur Urol, 56, pp.928~933 (2009)
