학교 체육 상해 사고에서의 중국 위험인수 원칙의 응용 : 논의, 원인 및 개선 전략 연구
Application of the Assumption of Risk Principle in School Physical Injury Cases in China : Discussion, Causes, and Improvement Strategies
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzes how the 'assumption of risk principle,' introduced by the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China on January 1, 2021, is applied to injury incidents that occur during school physical activities, and examines its impact on the fairness of legal liability distribution. The study focuses on the legal liability distribution between schools and students, particularly in high-risk educational settings such as physical activities. Through actual case studies of the application of the assumption of risk principle, the research explores ways to resolve legal and educational conflicts and suggests improvements for fairer legal liability distribution. The findings indicate that while the assumption of risk principle can serve as an important standard for fair liability distribution in injury cases, ambiguity in its scope and interpretation has led to ongoing debates. Therefore, this study proposes legislative and policy recommendations to enhance the fairness of liability distribution and assesses the long-term applicability and limitations of the assumption of risk principle within the Chinese legal system.
Abstract
This study analyzes how the 'assumption of risk principle,' introduced by the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China on January 1, 2021, is applied to injury incidents that occur during school physical activities, and examines its impact on the fairness of legal liability distribution. The study focuses on the legal liability distribution between schools and students, particularly in high-risk educational settings such as physical activities. Through actual case studies of the application of the assumption of risk principle, the research explores ways to resolve legal and educational conflicts and suggests improvements for fairer legal liability distribution. The findings indicate that while the assumption of risk principle can serve as an important standard for fair liability distribution in injury cases, ambiguity in its scope and interpretation has led to ongoing debates. Therefore, this study proposes legislative and policy recommendations to enhance the fairness of liability distribution and assesses the long-term applicability and limitations of the assumption of risk principle within the Chinese legal system.
참고문헌 (44)
- 김대희, "개발제한구역 내 생활체육시설 설치를 위한 법제도 개선방안", 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법(JSEL), 23(3), pp.177~190 (2020)
- 남기연, "학교체육시설 이용 활성화를 위한 법제도적 개선 방안", 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법(JSEL), 20(3), pp.27~44 (2017)
- 백승흠, "스포츠사고에 있어 면책사유로서의 위험인자의 법리", 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법(JSEL), 10(2), pp.249~265 (2007)
- Bradley, Ann K., "Knight v. Jewett:Reasonable Implied Assumption of Risk as a Complete Defense in Sports Injury Cases", San Diego L. Rev, 28, pp.477~498 (1991)
- Drago, Alexander J., "Assumption of risk:An age-old defense still viable in sports and recreation cases, Fordham Intell", Prop. Media & Ent. LJ, 12, pp.583~608 (2001)
- Feldman, Eric A., "Assuming the risk: Tort law, policy, and politics on the slippery slope", DePaul L. Rev, 59, pp.259~304 (2009)
- Fitzgerald, Timothy B., "The Inherent Risk Doctrine, Amateur Coaching Negligence, and the Goal of Loss Avoidance", Nw. UL Rev, 99, pp.889~930 (2004)
- Geistfeld, Mark A., "Social Value as a Policy-Based Limitation of the Ordinary Duty to Exercise Reasonable Care", Wake Forest L. Rev, 44, pp.899~922 (2009)
- Gilles, Stephen G, "On determining negligence:Hand formula balancing, the reasonable person standard, and the jury", Vand. L. Rev, 54, pp.813~862 (2001)
- Hess, Lura., "Sports and the assumption of risk doctrine in New York", John's L. Rev, 76, pp.457~482 (2002)
- James Jr, Fleming, "Assumption of Risk", Yale LJ, 61, pp.141~169 (1952)
- John C. P. Goldberg, "Shielding Duty : How Attending to Assumption of Risk, Attractive Nuisance, and Other 'Quaint' Doctrines Can Improve Decisionmaking in Negligence Cases", Southern California Law Review, 79, pp.329~ (2006)
- Jacob, A., "AnInformation-Production Theory of Liability Rules", U. Chi. L. Rev, 89, pp.1113~ (2022)
- Lawson, Frederick Henry, "Duty of Care in Negligence: A Comparative Study", Tul. L. Rev, 22, pp.111~130 (1947)
- Maute, Judith L., "Sporting theory of justice:Taming adversary zeal with a logical sanctions doctrine", Conn. L. Rev, 20, pp.7~94 (1987)
- Messier Jr, William F., "Inherent risk and control risk assessments:Evidence on the effect of pervasive and specific risk factors", Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), pp.119~131 (2000)
- Sergienko, Gregory S, "Assumption of risk as a defense to negligence", W. St. UL Rev, 34, pp.1~28 (2006)
- Simons, K. W., "Assumption of risk and consent in the law of torts: A theory of full preference", BUL Rev, 67, pp.213~288 (1987)
- Simons, Kenneth W, "Reflections on Assumption of Risk", UCLA L. Rev, 50, pp.481~530 (2002)
- Spengler, John O., "Sport safety statutes and inherent risk: A comparison study of sport specific legislation", J. Legal Aspects Sport, 11, pp.135~168 (2001)
- Simons, K. W., "Reflections on Assumption of Risk", UCLA L. Rev, 50, pp.481~ (2002)
- Steenson, M. K., "The Role of Primary Assumption of Risk in Civil Litigation in Minnesota", Wm. Mitchell L. Rev, 30, pp.115~ (2003)
- Wang, X., "The rule of 'assumption of risk'in sports injury compensation", Sports Science, 39(6), pp.56~64 (2019)
- William L, "Comparative negligence", Mich. L. Rev, 51, pp.465~508 (1952)
- Wright, R. W., "Allocating liability among multiple responsible causes: A principled defense of joint and several liability for actual harm and risk exposure", UC Davis L. Rev, 21, pp.1141~ (1987)
- 曹权之, "民法典"自甘风险"条文研究", 东方法学, 4, pp.121~138 (2021)
- 丛灿日, "我国高校体育工作失范的归因及应对-「高等学校体育工作基本标准」引发的思考", Journal of Physical Education, 2015, pp.22(6), ~
- 董璐, "民法典时代自甘风险的规范解构及其漏洞补充", 法律适用, 5, pp.85~94 (2022)
- 康为民, "中国特色社会主义司法制度的自我完善—案例指导制度的定位", 价值与功能法律适用, 8, pp.2~5 (2011)
- 钱学峰, "美国体育中的自甘风险类型及其价值研究", 成都体育学院学报, 44(05), pp.14~19 (2018)
- 冉克平, "「民法典」立法目的条款之裁判检讨与功能定位", 东岳论丛, 4, pp.11~ (2022)
- 王家宏, "中国体育法治建设的战略走向与完善路径", 上海体育大学学报, 46(1), pp.32~40 (2022)
- 王丽丽, "体育活动中的自甘风险与安全保障义务", 法制与社会发展, 25(6), pp.83~95 (2019)
- 杨立新, "自甘风险 : 本土化的概念定义, 类型结构与法律适用—以白银山地马拉松越野赛体育事故为视角", 东方法学, 4, pp.107~120 (2021)
- 张新宝, "中华人民共和国民法典侵权责任编理解与适用", pp.47~ (2020), 中国法制出版社
- 周晓晨, "论受害人自甘冒险现象的侵权法规制", 当代法学, 2, pp.38~46 (2020)
- 陈娟, "自甘风险规则的裁判思路构建——以《民法典》第1176条第1款为解释文本", 天津法学, 38(3), pp.10~ (2022)
- 石记伟, "自甘风险的法教义学构造", 北方法学, (01), pp.148~160 (2022)
- 王利明, "论比较过失", 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), (02), pp.34~46 (2022)
- 张军, "法官的自由裁量权与司法正义", 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), (04), pp.16~22 (2015)
- 余雅风, "学生在校人身损害责任的法律解读与思考", 教育研究, (10), pp.38~43 (2011)
- 方芳, "学生伤害事故责任认定及风险防范——基于2017年510例司法诉讼案件的实证研究", 复旦教育论坛, (06), pp.27~33 (2018)
- 庞瑞霖, "民法典自甘风险规则法律适用探究", Dispute Settlement, 9, pp.881~ (2023)
- 黃清華, "論運動員與裁判員過失責任──從自由精神和英國法看《 民法典》 第 1176 條第1 款", Taiwan Law Review, 334 (2023)