한국형 환자분류도구-1(KPCS-1)의 신뢰도와 타당도 검증 및 간호시간 환산지수 산출
Verification of Reliability and Validity of KPCS-1 and Estimation of Nursing Time Conversion Index
3
조회
0
다운로드
36
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study was performed to verify reliability and validity of Korean Patient Classification System for nurses(KPCS-1), to estimate nursing time conversion index, and to classify patients into groups according to KPCS-1scores. Methods: KPCS-1 was revised from KPCS by a professional review team. Interrater reliability and construct validity of KPCS-1 were verified by data from 433 patients. Direct and indirect nursing time of 204 patients were measured by stopwatch observation and self reports for 24 hours. Nursing time conversion index was calculated. Results: KPCS-1 consisted of 12 area, 50 nursing activities, and 73 items. The interrater reliability was tested between two nurse group (r=.88, p<.001) and construct validity was verified according to medical department (F=10.97, p<.001)and patient pattern (F=5.54, p=.001). The correlation of nursing time and classification score was also statistically significant (r=.56, p<.001). The nursing time conversion index was 9.03 minutes per 1 classification score. The patients were classified into 4 groups by the classification scores. Conclusion: KPCS-1 can be a useful factor type patient classification system for general ward. Further study is needed to evaluate validity and reliability for refining KPCS-1and to develop ways connecting the scores with nursing outcomes.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to verify reliability and validity of Korean Patient Classification System for nurses(KPCS-1), to estimate nursing time conversion index, and to classify patients into groups according to KPCS-1scores. Methods: KPCS-1 was revised from KPCS by a professional review team. Interrater reliability and construct validity of KPCS-1 were verified by data from 433 patients. Direct and indirect nursing time of 204 patients were measured by stopwatch observation and self reports for 24 hours. Nursing time conversion index was calculated. Results: KPCS-1 consisted of 12 area, 50 nursing activities, and 73 items. The interrater reliability was tested between two nurse group (r=.88, p<.001) and construct validity was verified according to medical department (F=10.97, p<.001)and patient pattern (F=5.54, p=.001). The correlation of nursing time and classification score was also statistically significant (r=.56, p<.001). The nursing time conversion index was 9.03 minutes per 1 classification score. The patients were classified into 4 groups by the classification scores. Conclusion: KPCS-1 can be a useful factor type patient classification system for general ward. Further study is needed to evaluate validity and reliability for refining KPCS-1and to develop ways connecting the scores with nursing outcomes.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김은혜, "간호강도에 의한 환자분류도구의 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증", 석사, pp.2005
- 김조자, "직접 간호활동 분석을 기초로 한 환자분류체계의 기준 설정을 위한 연구", 대한간호학회지, 17(1), pp.9~23 (1987)
- 박정호, "한국형 진단명 기준 환자군(K-DRG)분류를 이용한 입원환자의 간호원가 산정에 관한 연구.이화여자대학교 박사학위논문", 서울. (1988)
- 박정호, "환자분류에 의한 간호인력 산정 및 배치과정 전산화", 대한간호학회지, 26(2), pp.399~412 (1996)
- 박정호, "종합병원에 입원한 환자의 간호원가 산정에 관한 연구", 대한간호학회지, 20(1), pp.16~37 (1990)
- 송경자, "간호요구 정도에 기초한 한국형 환자분류도구(KPCS)의 개발", 임상간호연구, 15(1), pp.5~17 (2009), 병원간호사회
- 신동순, "환자 중증도 분류를 통한 간호업무량 측정과 적정 간호인력 산정", 충남대간호학술지, 7(1), pp.94~108 (2004)
- 유정숙, "중환자 분류도구(WMSCN)의 신뢰도,타당도 및 환산지수 검증", 중환자간호학회지, 2(1), pp.48~57 (2009)
- 이윤신, "간호업무량 측정 및 간호인력 수요산정", 대한간호학회지, 22(4), pp.589~603 (1992)
- 이희옥, "내⋅외과 환자분류를 위한 도구개발 연구: 일 종합병원 중심으로", 석사, pp.1986
- 임상간호사회, "환자분류제도에 기초한 적정 간호인력산정", 대한간호, 31(3), pp.88~103 (1992)
- 장현숙, "일개 3차 진료기관의 환자 간호요구에 따른 간호업무량(Nursing Workload) 측정", 석사, pp.1990
- 황은영, "환자분류체계개발을 위한 결정지표(Critical Indicators)에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1994
- Abdellah, F. G, "Better patient care through nursing research" (1979), Macmillan
- DeLisle,J, "Designing an acuity tool for an ambulatory oncology setting", Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 13(1), pp.45~50 (2009)
- Eastaugh,S.R, "Hospital nurse productivity enhancement", Journal of Health Care Finance, 33(3), pp.39~47 (2007)
- Fawcett,R, "Management. Measurement of care quality", Nursing Mirror, 160(2), pp.29~31 (1985)
- Haas,S.A, "Patient classification systems: A selffulfilling prophecy", Nursing Management, 19(5), pp.56~58 (1988)
- Hyun, S, "Evidence-based staffing: Potential roles for informatics", Nursing Economic$ (2008)
- Wiskow,C, "Workload measurement in determining staffing levels", International Council of Nurses., ~ (2004)
- Johnson,K, "A practical approach to patient classification", Nursing Management, 15(6), pp.39~46 (1984)
- Kirk,R, "Using workload analysis and acuity systems to facilitate quality and productivity", The Journal of Nursing Administration, 20(3), pp.21~30 (1990)
- Lindner,C.A, "Work measurement and nursing time standards", Nursing Management, 20(10), pp.44~49 (1989)
- Mowry, M. M, "Do DRG reimbursement rates reflect nursing cost?", The Journal of Nursing Administration, 15(7), pp.29~35 (1985)
- Riccolo,D.O, "Institutional approaches to costing out", Nursing Series on Nursing Administration, 1, pp.32~45 (1988)
- "Workload management system for nursing (Patient classification system)"[URL]