본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

괴물의 언어: 다문화시대의 프랑켄슈타인과 드라큘라

The Language of Monsters: Frankenstein and Dracula in Multiculturalism

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Monsters cannot speak. They have been objectified and represented through a particular concept ‘monstrosity’ that renders the presence of monsters effectively simplified and nullified. In contemporary monster narratives, however, the site of monsters reveals that they could be the complex construction of society, culture, language and ideology. As going into the structure that concept is based on, therefore, meanings of monsters would be seen to be highly unstable. When symbolic language strives to match monsters with a unified concept, their meanings become only further deferred rather than valorized. This shows the language of monsters should disclose the self-contradiction inherent in ‘monstrosity,’ which has made others―namely beings we define as ‘different’ from ourselves in culture or physical appearance―embodied as abject and horrifying monsters. Unable to be understood, accepted, or called humans. I analyse Frankenstein and Dracula that firmly converge monstrous bodies into a symbolic meaning, demonstrating how this fusion causes problems in the multicultural society. I especially emphasize the undeniable affirmation of expurgated others we need to have empathetic relations with, because their difference, unfamiliarity, and slight divergences are likely to be defined as abnormalities. In the multicultural society, thus, we must learn to embrace diversity, while also having to recognize there are many others that have been thought of as monsters; ironically enabling us to think about an undeniable imperative of being responsive to other people. In this respect, the monstrous inhuman goes to the heart of the ethical undercurrent of multiculturalism, its resolute attempt to recognize and respect someone else’s difference from me. A focus on empathetic relations with others, thus, can strengthen the process of creating social mechanisms that do justice to the competing claims of different cultural groups and individuals.

Abstract

Monsters cannot speak. They have been objectified and represented through a particular concept ‘monstrosity’ that renders the presence of monsters effectively simplified and nullified. In contemporary monster narratives, however, the site of monsters reveals that they could be the complex construction of society, culture, language and ideology. As going into the structure that concept is based on, therefore, meanings of monsters would be seen to be highly unstable. When symbolic language strives to match monsters with a unified concept, their meanings become only further deferred rather than valorized. This shows the language of monsters should disclose the self-contradiction inherent in ‘monstrosity,’ which has made others―namely beings we define as ‘different’ from ourselves in culture or physical appearance―embodied as abject and horrifying monsters. Unable to be understood, accepted, or called humans. I analyse Frankenstein and Dracula that firmly converge monstrous bodies into a symbolic meaning, demonstrating how this fusion causes problems in the multicultural society. I especially emphasize the undeniable affirmation of expurgated others we need to have empathetic relations with, because their difference, unfamiliarity, and slight divergences are likely to be defined as abnormalities. In the multicultural society, thus, we must learn to embrace diversity, while also having to recognize there are many others that have been thought of as monsters; ironically enabling us to think about an undeniable imperative of being responsive to other people. In this respect, the monstrous inhuman goes to the heart of the ethical undercurrent of multiculturalism, its resolute attempt to recognize and respect someone else’s difference from me. A focus on empathetic relations with others, thus, can strengthen the process of creating social mechanisms that do justice to the competing claims of different cultural groups and individuals.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 피종호, "해체미학-니체에서 후기구조주의까지" (2005), 뿌리와 이파리
  2. Brooks, Peter, "Body Works: Objects of Desire in Modern Narrative" (1992), Harvard University Press
  3. Brown, Wendy, "Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire" (2006), Princeton University Press
  4. De Man, Paul, "Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust" (1979), Yale University Press
  5. De Man, Paul, "Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism" (1983), Methuen
  6. Deleuze, Gilles, "A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia" (1987), University of Minnesota Press
  7. Derrida, Jacques, "Aporias" (1993), Stanford University Press
  8. Derrida, Jacques, "Deconstruction and Philosophy", pp.161~196 (1986), University of Chicago Press
  9. Derrida, Jacques, "The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow)", Critical Inquiry, 28(2), pp.369~418 (2002)
  10. Ferguson, Christine, "Nonstandard Language and the Cultural Stakes of Stoker’s Dracula", ELH, 71(1), pp.229~240 (2004)
  11. Grixti, Joseph, "Terrors of Uncertainty: The Cultural Contexts of Horror Fiction" (1989), Routledge
  12. Halberstam, Judith, "Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters" (1995), Duke University
  13. Hobsbawm, Eric, "The Age of Empire 1875-1914" (1987), Vintage Books
  14. Jacobs, Carol, "Reading De Man Reading", pp.105~120 (1989), University of Minnesota Press
  15. Johnson, Mark, "The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason" (1987), University of Chicago Press
  16. Kearney, Richard, "Strangers, Gods and Monsters" (2003), Routledge
  17. Lyotard, Jean-Francois, "The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge" (1984), University of Minnesota Press
  18. McLaren, Peter, "Multiculturalism: A Critical Reader", pp.45~76 (1994), Blackwell Publisher Ltd
  19. Moretti, Franco, "Signs Taken for Wonders: Essays in the Sociology of Literary Forms" (1983), Verso
  20. Ng, Andrew Hock-soon, "Dimensions of Monstrosity in Contemporary Narratives", pp.1~21 (2004), Palgrave Macmillan
  21. Phillips, Andrew, "The Rebirth of England and English: The Vision of William Barnes" (1996), Andrew Rowe Ltd
  22. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, "Emile or on Education" (1979), Basic Books
  23. Shelley, Mary, "Frankenstein" (1996), Norton & Company, Inc
  24. Stoker, Bram, "Dracula" (1997), Norton & Company, Inc
  25. Wolfe, Cary, "Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal", pp.1~58 (2003), University of Minnesota Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)