본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상징계에서 실재계로—『프랑켄슈타인』의 이데올로기적 주체 빅터

From the Symbolic to the Real: Victor as the Ideological Subject in Frankenstein

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The structure of Frankenstein revolves around the event of creation, blurring the definite boundaries between a human and a monster. As embodied in the monster that Victor created, a piece of the Real—a stain of traumatic irrationality and ontologically ruptured humanity—will be discussed in conjunction with Victor as an epistemological and ideological subject. Victor becomes an organization of patriarchal scientists armed with scientific knowhow which has amazing abilities but uses them irresponsibly. For his part,Victor insists that digging around among corpses does not bother him, that he is particularly invulnerable to supernatural horrors. It seems that Victor is the spontaneous agent legally responsible for his scientific project. He freely assumes and identifies with the task of creation. He slaves away in solitude and wards off human connection. He is blind and unaware of the full import of what is happening. This is the realist’s imbecility or a naive empiricism. When he perceives the monstrosity that he has created, the sight horrifies him. Such a monstrosity marks the limits of the elitist ideology of the scientific world and epitomizes the real desire of the ideological subject. The prevalence of paradox such as Victor’s hatred of the monster and the destruction of everyone near to him both exposes the way ideology operates in modern societies and embodies the presence of the Real which belies the universalization of hegemonic ideas of scientific world. That’s why my study focuses on the problems of ideology and the Real in the novel. Key Words: Frankenstein, the Symbolic, the Real, the ideological subject,self-consciousness

Abstract

The structure of Frankenstein revolves around the event of creation, blurring the definite boundaries between a human and a monster. As embodied in the monster that Victor created, a piece of the Real—a stain of traumatic irrationality and ontologically ruptured humanity—will be discussed in conjunction with Victor as an epistemological and ideological subject. Victor becomes an organization of patriarchal scientists armed with scientific knowhow which has amazing abilities but uses them irresponsibly. For his part,Victor insists that digging around among corpses does not bother him, that he is particularly invulnerable to supernatural horrors. It seems that Victor is the spontaneous agent legally responsible for his scientific project. He freely assumes and identifies with the task of creation. He slaves away in solitude and wards off human connection. He is blind and unaware of the full import of what is happening. This is the realist’s imbecility or a naive empiricism. When he perceives the monstrosity that he has created, the sight horrifies him. Such a monstrosity marks the limits of the elitist ideology of the scientific world and epitomizes the real desire of the ideological subject. The prevalence of paradox such as Victor’s hatred of the monster and the destruction of everyone near to him both exposes the way ideology operates in modern societies and embodies the presence of the Real which belies the universalization of hegemonic ideas of scientific world. That’s why my study focuses on the problems of ideology and the Real in the novel. Key Words: Frankenstein, the Symbolic, the Real, the ideological subject,self-consciousness

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Althusser, Louis, "Freud and Lacan, In Essays on Ideology", pp.141~171 (1984), Verso
  2. Althusser, Louis, "For Marx" (1969), Pantheon
  3. Althusser, Louis, "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses, In Mapping Ideology", pp.100~140 (1994), Verso
  4. Slavoj Zizek, "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses, In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays", pp.127~186 (1971), Monthly Review P
  5. Ball, John Clement, "Imperial Monstrosities: Frankenstein, the West Indies, and V. S. Naipaul", ARIEL, 32, pp.31~57 (2001)
  6. Dennett, Daniel C, "Freedom Evolves" (2003), Penguin
  7. Derrida, Jacques, "Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International" (1994), Routledge
  8. Evans, Dylan, "An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis" (1996), Routledge
  9. Ferretter, Luke, "Louis Althusser" (2006), Routledge
  10. Freeman, Barbara, "Frankenstein with Kant: A Theory of Monstrosity, or the Monstrosity of Theory", Substance, 16, pp.21~31 (1987)
  11. Hammond, Kim, "Monsters of Modernity: Frankenstein and Modern Environmentalism", Cultural Geographies, 11, pp.181~198 (2004)
  12. Hegel, G. W. F, "Phenomenology of Spirit" (1977), Oxford UP
  13. Homer, Sean, "Jacques Lacan" (2005), Routledge
  14. LeDoux, Joseph, "Synaptic Self" (2002), Macmillan
  15. Lacan, Jacques, "Écrits" (1966), Seuil
  16. Lacan, Jacques, "“Au-delà du “principe de realit”” Écrits", pp.73~92 (1936), Seuil
  17. Lacan, Jacques, "Écrit: A Selection" (1977), Norton
  18. Lacan, Jacques, "The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis, In Écrit: The First Complete Edition in English" (2006), Norton
  19. Lacan, Jacques, "Position of the Unconscious, In Reading Seminar XI: Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis", pp.259~277 (1995), SUNY P
  20. Lacan, Jacques, "The Seminar of Jacques Lacan I: Freud’s Papers on Technique, 1953-54" (1991), Norton
  21. Lacan, Jacques, "The Seminar of Jacques Lacan II: The Ego in Freud’ Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954-55" (1991), Norton
  22. Lacan, Jacques, "The Seminar of Jacques Lacan XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis" (1981), Norton
  23. Mellor, Anne, "A Feminiest Critique of Science, In Frankenstein: New Casebooks", pp.107~139 (1995), Macmillan
  24. Mellor, Anne, "Possessing Nature: The Female in Frankenstein, In Romanticism and Feminism", pp.220~232 (1988), Indiana UP
  25. Myers, Tony, "Slavoj Zizek" (2003), Routledge
  26. Nobus, Dany, "Jacques Lacan and the Freudian Practice of Psychoanalysis" (2000), Routledge
  27. Pascal, Blaise, "Pensées" (1966), Penguin
  28. Pillow, Kirk, "Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel" (2003), The MIT UP
  29. Roustang, François, "The Lacanian Delusion" (1990), Oxford UP
  30. Sandra M. Gilbert, "The Madwoman in the Attic: Woman Writer and the 19th Century Literary Imagination" (1979), Yale UP
  31. Shelley, Mary, "Frankenstein" (2003), Barnes & Noble Classics
  32. Sterrenburg, Lee, "Mary Shelley’s Monster: Politics and Psyche in Frankenstein, In The Endurance of Frankenstein: Essays on Mary Shelley’s Novel", pp.143~171 (1977), U of California P
  33. Zizek, Slavoj, "Cogito and the Unconscious" (1999), Duke UP
  34. Zizek, Slavoj, "For They Know Not What They Do" (1991), Verso
  35. Zizek, Slavoj, "Mapping Ideology" (1994), Verso
  36. Zizek, Slavoj, "Interrogating the Real, In Rex Butler and Scott Stephens" (2005), Continuum
  37. Zizek, Slavoj, "The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology" (1999), Verso
  38. Zizek, Slavoj, "The Sublime Object of Ideology" (1989), Verso
  39. Zizek, Slavoj, "The Parallax View" (2006), MIT P

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)