Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Evaluation of the Steno-occlusive Disease of the Supraaortic Arteries: Comparison with Computed Tomography Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose : To intra-individually compare diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) with computed tomography angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the assessment of supraaortic steno-occlusive disease. Materials and Methods : Twenty-eight patients (20 men, 8 women, 53-79 years of age) underwent supraaortic CE-MRA, CTA and DSA. CE-MRA was performed on two 1.5T MR scanners (voxel dimension: 0.66×0.66×1.1 or 1.2 mm3), and CTA on 64-slice CT scanners (voxel dimension: 0.42×0.42×0.63 mm3). All the three examinations were completed within 40 days (median 19 days; range 1-40 days). Retrospective evaluation and measurement of diameter of 6 extracranial and 9 intracranial arterial segments was done by 2 experienced radiologists. Results : A total of 420 arterial segments were examined by CE-MRA, CTA and DSA. On DSA, 34 stenoocclusive lesions were noted at extracranial (n=19) and intracranial (n=15) vessels. For extracranial stenosis greater than 70%, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were 94.7%, 98.7%, 90.0% and 99.3% on CE-MRA, and 94.7%, 99.3%, 94.7% and 99.3% on CTA. For intracranial stenosis greater than 50%, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 93.3%, 98.3%, 77.8%and 99.6% on CE-MRA, and 86.7%, 97.9%, 72.2% and 99.1% on CTA, with DSA as the standard of reference. Conclusion : Supraaortic CE-MRA is as reliable as CTA in depicting the arterial stenosis, and is effective in screening of significant stenosis of both extracranial and intracranial arterial stenosis.
Abstract
Purpose : To intra-individually compare diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) with computed tomography angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the assessment of supraaortic steno-occlusive disease. Materials and Methods : Twenty-eight patients (20 men, 8 women, 53-79 years of age) underwent supraaortic CE-MRA, CTA and DSA. CE-MRA was performed on two 1.5T MR scanners (voxel dimension: 0.66×0.66×1.1 or 1.2 mm3), and CTA on 64-slice CT scanners (voxel dimension: 0.42×0.42×0.63 mm3). All the three examinations were completed within 40 days (median 19 days; range 1-40 days). Retrospective evaluation and measurement of diameter of 6 extracranial and 9 intracranial arterial segments was done by 2 experienced radiologists. Results : A total of 420 arterial segments were examined by CE-MRA, CTA and DSA. On DSA, 34 stenoocclusive lesions were noted at extracranial (n=19) and intracranial (n=15) vessels. For extracranial stenosis greater than 70%, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were 94.7%, 98.7%, 90.0% and 99.3% on CE-MRA, and 94.7%, 99.3%, 94.7% and 99.3% on CTA. For intracranial stenosis greater than 50%, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 93.3%, 98.3%, 77.8%and 99.6% on CE-MRA, and 86.7%, 97.9%, 72.2% and 99.1% on CTA, with DSA as the standard of reference. Conclusion : Supraaortic CE-MRA is as reliable as CTA in depicting the arterial stenosis, and is effective in screening of significant stenosis of both extracranial and intracranial arterial stenosis.
참고문헌 (29)
- Hankey GJ, "Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease", Stroke, 21, pp.209~222 (1990)
- Heiserman JE, "Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 15, pp.1401~1407 (1994)
- Willinsky RA, "Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: Prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature", Radiology, 227, pp.522~528 (2003)
- Agid R, "Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 29, pp.1570~1574 (2008)
- Teksam M, "Multi-section ct angiography for detection of cerebral aneurysms", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 25, pp.1485~1492 (2004)
- Berg M, "Multi-detector row ct angiography in the assessment of carotid artery disease in symptomatic patients: Comparison with rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 26, pp.1022~1034 (2005)
- Josephson SA, "Evaluation of carotid stenosis using ct angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA", Neurology, 63, pp.457~460 (2004)
- Oelerich M, "Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: Comparison of 3d time-of-flight and 3d phase-contrast MR angiography", Neuroradiology, 40, pp.567~573 (1998)
- Remonda L, "Contrast-enhanced 3d mr angiography of the carotid artery: Comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 23, pp.213~219 (2002)
- Skutta B, "Intracranial stenoocclusive disease: Double-detector helical ct angiography versus digital subtraction angiography", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 20, pp.791~799 (1999)
- Villablanca JP, "3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: Comparison with timeof- flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography", Invest Radiol, 41, pp.799~805 (2006)
- Chappell FM, "Carotid artery stenosis: Accuracy of noninvasive tests—individual patient data meta-analysis", Radiology, 251, pp.493~502 (2009)
- Muhlenbruch G, "Comparison of dual-source CT angiography and MR angiography in preoperative evaluation of intra- and extracranial vessels: a pilot study", Eur Radiol (2009)
- Samuels OB, "A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 21, pp.643~646 (2000)
- North american symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trialcollaborators, "Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis", N Engl J Med, 325, pp.445~453 (1991)
- European carotid surgery trialists’ collaborative group, "MRCeuropean carotid surgery trial: Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0- 29%) carotid stenosis", Lancet, 337, pp.1235~1243 (1991)
- Biller J, "Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the stroke council, american heart association", Circulation, 97, pp.501~509 (1998)
- Chimowitz MI, "Frankel MR et al.Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis", N Engl J Med, 352, pp.1305~1316 (2005)
- Babiarz LS, "Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography with high-resolution black blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing carotid artery stenosis", J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, pp.963~970 (2007)
- Cosottini M, "Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making", Stroke, 34, pp.660~664 (2003)
- Randoux B, "Carotid artery stenosis: Prospective comparison of ct, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography", Radiology, 220, pp.179~185 (2001)
- Leclerc X, "Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: The effect of voxel size on image quality", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 21, pp.1021~1027 (2000)
- Babiarz LS, "Contrast-enhanced mr angiography is not more accurate than unenhanced 2D time-of-flight MR angiography for determining > or = 70% internal carotid artery stenosis", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 30, pp.761~768 (2009)
- Riederer SJ, "3D contrastenhanced MR angiography using fluoroscopic triggering and an elliptical centric view order", Int J Card Imaging, 15, pp.117~129 (1999)
- Wilman AH, "Arterial phase carotid and vertebral artery imaging in 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography by combining fluoroscopic triggering with an elliptical centric acquisition order", Magn Reson Med, 40, pp.24~35 (1998)
- Willinek WA, "Randomly segmented central kspace ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced mr angiography of the supraaortic arteries: Initial experience", Radiology, 225, pp.583~588 (2002)
- Willinek WA, "Noninvasive detection of stenoocclusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with threedimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography", Stroke, 36, pp.38~43 (2005)
- Nael K, "Supraaortic arteries: Contrast-enhanced mr angiography at 3.0 t—highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view", Radiology, 242, pp.600~609 (2007)
- Fink C, "Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional pulmonary perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: Intraindividual comparison of 1.0 m gadobutrol and 0.5 m gd-dtpa at three dose levels", Invest Radiol, 39, pp.143~148 (2004)