경통 환자들을 위한 Neck Pain and Disability Scale의 신뢰도 연구
Reliability of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale in Neck Pain Patients
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
The self-report measure is a useful tool for evaluating self-recognized disability and difficulty in daily living activities. Although many studies and clinics used the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) for measuring neck pain and functional impairment, there has not been much adaptation of this for use with Korean patients. The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of NPDS among Korean neck pain patients. Fifty-five subjects (32 males, 23 females) with neck pain enrolled in this study. They completed standardized self-administered questionnaires. The NPDS measures pain intensity; its interference with vocational, emotional, recreational, social, and functional aspects of living; and the presence and extent of associated factors. Reliability was determined by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Validity was examined by correlating the NPDS scores to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. The test-retest reliability of the translated versions of the NPDS was good ICC (2,1)=.86 (95%CI .76～.92). Cronbach's alpha value for NPDS was found to be .93, and this was statistically significant (p<.05). The criterion-related validity coefficient was .79 (p<.01). We conclude that the Korean version of NPDS has been shown to be a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of neck pain. Successful linguistic and cultural translation will admit appropriate cross-cultural comparison for clinical analysis. Therefore, this study can be expected to be used as an adequate evaluation scale for neck pain related studies and treatments.
Abstract
The self-report measure is a useful tool for evaluating self-recognized disability and difficulty in daily living activities. Although many studies and clinics used the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) for measuring neck pain and functional impairment, there has not been much adaptation of this for use with Korean patients. The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of NPDS among Korean neck pain patients. Fifty-five subjects (32 males, 23 females) with neck pain enrolled in this study. They completed standardized self-administered questionnaires. The NPDS measures pain intensity; its interference with vocational, emotional, recreational, social, and functional aspects of living; and the presence and extent of associated factors. Reliability was determined by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Validity was examined by correlating the NPDS scores to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. The test-retest reliability of the translated versions of the NPDS was good ICC (2,1)=.86 (95%CI .76～.92). Cronbach's alpha value for NPDS was found to be .93, and this was statistically significant (p<.05). The criterion-related validity coefficient was .79 (p<.01). We conclude that the Korean version of NPDS has been shown to be a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of neck pain. Successful linguistic and cultural translation will admit appropriate cross-cultural comparison for clinical analysis. Therefore, this study can be expected to be used as an adequate evaluation scale for neck pain related studies and treatments.
참고문헌 (30)
- Abdulwahab SS, "Treatment based on H-reflexes testing improves disability status in patients with cervical radiculopathy", Int J Rehabil Res, 22(3), pp.207~214 (1999)
- Agarwal S, "Reliability and validity of the Hindi version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale in cervical radiculopathy patients", Disabil Rehabil, 28(22), pp.1405~1411 (2006)
- Barry M, "ABC of rheumatology. Pain in neck shoulder and arm", BMJ, 310(6973), pp.183~186 (1995)
- Beaton DE, "Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures", Spine, 25(24), pp.3186~3191 (2000)
- Bicer A, "Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale", Disabil Rehabil, 26(16), pp.959~962 (2004)
- Binkley JM, "The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network", Phys Ther, 79(4), pp.371~383 (1999)
- Borghouts JA, "The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: A systematic review", Pain, 77(1), pp.1~13 (1998)
- Cook C, "Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale", Spine, 31(14), pp.1621~1627 (2006)
- Fairbank JC, "The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire", Physiotherapy, 66(8), pp.271~273 (1980)
- Ferrari R, "Regional musculoskeletal conditions: Neck pain", Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol, 17(1), pp.57~70 (2003)
- Goolkasian P, "The neck pain and disability scale: Test-retest reliability and construct validity", Clin J Pain, 18(4), pp.245~250 (2002)
- Hains F, "Psychometric properties of the neck disability index", J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 21(2), pp.75~80 (1998)
- Huskisson EC, "Measurement of pain", Lancet, 2(7889), pp.1127~1131 (1974)
- Johnson MJ, "Value of cervical spine radiographs as a screening tool", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 340, pp.102~108 (1997)
- Jordan A, "The Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale: A study of reliability and validity", J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 21(8), pp.520~527 (1998)
- Kellgren JH, "Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis", Ann Rheum Dis, 16(4), pp.494~502 (1957)
- Kose G, "A comparison of four disability scales for Turkish patients with neck pain", J Rehabil Med, 39(5), pp.358~362 (2007)
- Leak AM, "The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, devised to measure neck pain and disability", Br J Rheumatol, 33(5), pp.469~474 (1994)
- Mawdsley RH, "Criterion-related validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring ankle edema", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 30(3), pp.149~153 (2000)
- Million R, "Evaluation of low back pain and assessment of lumbar corsets with and without back support", Ann Rheum Dis, 40(5), pp.449~454 (1981)
- Patrick DL, "Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life", Med Care, 27(3 Suppl), pp.S217~S232 (1989)
- Pietrobon R, "Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: A systematic review", Spine, 27(5), pp.515~522 (2002)
- Portney LG, "Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to practice. 2nd ed" (2000), Prentice Hall Health
- Riddle DL, "Use of generic versus region-specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders", Phys Ther, 78(9), pp.951~963 (1998)
- Rothstein JM, "Primer on Measurement: An introductory guide to measurement issues. Alexandria, VA", American Physical Therapy Association (1999)
- Vernon H, "The Neck Disability Index: A study of reliability and validity", J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 14(7), pp.409~415 (1991)
- Vos CJ, "Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice", Eur Spine J, 15(11), pp.1729~1736 (2006)
- Wheeler AH, "Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity", Spine, 24(13), pp.1290~1294 (1999)
- Wlodyka-Demaille S, "French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83(3), pp.376~382 (2002)
- Wlodyka-Demaille S, "The ability to change of three questionnaires for neck pain", Joint Bone Spine, 71(4), pp.317~326 (2004)