A Study on the Cooperation Between Korea and the EU regarding Climate Change
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
During the Post Kyoto era, we face main and hot issues such as ‘who will be a principal agents to reduce the GHGs emissions,’ ‘which appropriate reduction standards will be chosen,’ ‘which reduction methods will be used.’ Moreover, we need to discuss further on the following issues; ‘systemizing MRV for effective ET’; ‘checking whether the ETS helps real GHGs reduction and low-carbon growth’; ‘need research on the possibility of international trading of emission right’; ‘developing and diffusing technology to reduce the GHGs in substance.’After careful consideration on the above mentioned issues, we need to choose appropriate methods and standards to reduce the GHGs remissions. And, we need to investigate carefully ‘how to systemize MRV with the EU’ and ‘how to develop new technology and transfer this’ and so on. With this, South Korea can become a hub in the era of green growth with the role of bridge between developed anddeveloping countries. These efforts of the world to reduce the GHGs emissions are helpful for each country to promote their economy with green new deal investments. The Granger causality test result in this research shows that the U.K. affects to Germany in emitting CO2. And, the U.K. affects to France in emitting CO2. France affects to the U.K. in emitting CO2. It is likely that South Korea will be affected by the European countries through CO2 emission. Rapid economic growth of South Korea makes CO2 emissions more and more, and this “likely” affect to the European countries by trading with each other. With this result, we can presume that intimacy in geography, politics, and economy affect to emit more CO2. So, these countries need more cooperation with each other to reduce the GHGs. With this cooperation, their intimacy will be more tightened.
Abstract
During the Post Kyoto era, we face main and hot issues such as ‘who will be a principal agents to reduce the GHGs emissions,’ ‘which appropriate reduction standards will be chosen,’ ‘which reduction methods will be used.’ Moreover, we need to discuss further on the following issues; ‘systemizing MRV for effective ET’; ‘checking whether the ETS helps real GHGs reduction and low-carbon growth’; ‘need research on the possibility of international trading of emission right’; ‘developing and diffusing technology to reduce the GHGs in substance.’After careful consideration on the above mentioned issues, we need to choose appropriate methods and standards to reduce the GHGs remissions. And, we need to investigate carefully ‘how to systemize MRV with the EU’ and ‘how to develop new technology and transfer this’ and so on. With this, South Korea can become a hub in the era of green growth with the role of bridge between developed anddeveloping countries. These efforts of the world to reduce the GHGs emissions are helpful for each country to promote their economy with green new deal investments. The Granger causality test result in this research shows that the U.K. affects to Germany in emitting CO2. And, the U.K. affects to France in emitting CO2. France affects to the U.K. in emitting CO2. It is likely that South Korea will be affected by the European countries through CO2 emission. Rapid economic growth of South Korea makes CO2 emissions more and more, and this “likely” affect to the European countries by trading with each other. With this result, we can presume that intimacy in geography, politics, and economy affect to emit more CO2. So, these countries need more cooperation with each other to reduce the GHGs. With this cooperation, their intimacy will be more tightened.
참고문헌 (23)
- Bloomberg New Energy Finance, "Carbon Market Round-Up 2009", ~ (2010)
- Bloomberg New Energy Finance, "Carbon Market-EU ETS Research Note", ~ (2010)
- Business Institute for Sustainable Development(BISD), "Global Green House Gases, TraderelatedEnvironmental Regulation Guide", ~ (2010)
- Ellerman, D. A, "The European Union's Emissions Trading System inPerspective", Pew Center on Global Climate Change (2008)
- Engle, R. F, "Co-integration and error correction:representation,estimating and testing", Econometrica, 55 (1987)
- "European Commission"[URL]
- Garrison, J. L, "Clean Energy & Climate Change Opportunities Assessment for USAIS", Mexico, 2010, pp.1~108
- "GlobalWindow"[URL]
- HSBC Global Research, "A Climate for Recovery, The Colour of Stimulus Goes Green", 2~ (2009)
- KEMCO, "Carbon Market Research Society 2nd Year Final Workshop" (2010)
- KEMCO, "GHGs Verification Forum", KEMCOCDM (2010)
- KFI, "GHGs Target Management System and Emission Trading System Seminar, KBCSD" (2010)
- , “Trend of Main Countries' Policy", "KIERTechnological Policy Focus", 2010, ~
- Korea Energy Economics Institute(KEEI), "International Seminar on Climate Change" (2006)
- Linking Policies when Tastes Differ: Global Climate Policyin a Heterogeneous World, "Metcalf, G", Harvard Project onInternational Climate Agreements, Harvard Kennedy School, 1~34, pp.Discussion Paper 10-38 (2010)
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, "Free Trade Agreements between South Korea andthe EU", ~ (2009)
- National Carbon Market Study Regular Forum, "Condition of South Korea Carbon Marketand Foreign Trend" (2010)
- Oh, T. H, "Policy Response and Implications on Climate Change of the EU", RegionalResearch Series, 08(01) (2008), KIEP
- Park H. I, "Meaning and Tasks on Carbon Emission Exchange Market", SERI EconomicFocus, 299 (2010)
- "Canada, Mexico, US to align GHG reporting"[URL]
- Robins, N., "A Climate for Recovery, The Colour of stimulusgoes green", HSBC Global Research, pp.1~48 (2009)
- Richard Cooper, "Europe's Emissions Trading System", ~ (2010)
- 유상희, "EU의 기후변화협약 대응정책 평가 및 시사점", 유럽연구, 26(1), pp.251~277 (2008), 한국유럽학회