본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Is European Citizenship Mere Rhetoric?

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

This paper explored to what extent the formal provisions of European citizenship is fully demonstrated and further guarantee citizens rights: civic, political and social. It argued then that for the transnational polity system such as the EU, the demo-formation is essential not only for the legitimation but further integration; thus, the citizenship practice could be a tool for demosformation. However, at least so far, EU citizenship has not led to the establishment of a meaningful Euro-demos; thus, in the EU, it can be questioned whether citizens really want to play a more active role in EU governance, or just to express vague but increasing dissatisfaction with a Union that continues to be considered distant and arcane. In formal terms, European citizenship is underdeveloped, lacking both the duties which are necessary to cultivate a sense of mutual responsibility and many of the rights which might lend it greater salience; in terms of citizenship practice, there are insufficient opportunities for political engagement, especially if considered NGOs influence to EU policy-making, they are not always inside because of the lack of resources, the institutional limits of the EU per se and even their reluctant position of being a legislator rather campaigner.

Abstract

This paper explored to what extent the formal provisions of European citizenship is fully demonstrated and further guarantee citizens rights: civic, political and social. It argued then that for the transnational polity system such as the EU, the demo-formation is essential not only for the legitimation but further integration; thus, the citizenship practice could be a tool for demosformation. However, at least so far, EU citizenship has not led to the establishment of a meaningful Euro-demos; thus, in the EU, it can be questioned whether citizens really want to play a more active role in EU governance, or just to express vague but increasing dissatisfaction with a Union that continues to be considered distant and arcane. In formal terms, European citizenship is underdeveloped, lacking both the duties which are necessary to cultivate a sense of mutual responsibility and many of the rights which might lend it greater salience; in terms of citizenship practice, there are insufficient opportunities for political engagement, especially if considered NGOs influence to EU policy-making, they are not always inside because of the lack of resources, the institutional limits of the EU per se and even their reluctant position of being a legislator rather campaigner.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Balanyá, B., "Europe Inc: Regional and Global Restructuring and the Rise of Corporate Power" (2000), Pluto Press
  2. Bauböck, R., "Transnational Citizenship: Membership and Rights in International Migration" (1994), Edward Elgar
  3. Bellamy, R., "Lineages of European Citizenship" (2004), Palgrave
  4. Blondel, J., "People and Parliament in the European Union: Participation, Democracy and Legitimacy" (1998), Clarendon
  5. Chryssochou, D., "Democracy in the European Union" (1998), Tauris
  6. Closa, C., "The Concept of Citizenship in the Treaty on European Union", Common Market Law Review, 29, pp.113~169 (1992)
  7. Craig, P., "EU Law" (2003), Oxford University Press
  8. Cram, L., "Imagining the Union: A case of Banal Europeanization?" (1997), Palgrave
  9. Duchesne, S., "Is there a European Identity? In Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance" (1995), Oxford University Press
  10. Everson, M., "New Legal Dynamics of European Union" (1995), New Legal Dynamics of European Union
  11. Everts, P., "Conclusion: European Publics and the Legitimacy of International Governance’ in Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance" (1995), Oxford University Press
  12. Héritier, A., "Elements of Democratic Legitimation in Europe: An Alternative Perspective", Journal of European Public Policy, 6(2), pp.269~282 (1999)
  13. Kohler-Koch, B., "Framing: The Bottleneck of Constructing Legitimate Institutions", Journal of European Public Policy, 7(4), pp.513~531 (2000)
  14. Lehning, P., "Citizenship, Democracy and Justice in the New Europe" (1997), Routledge
  15. Lyons, C., "A Voyage around Article 8: An Historical and Comparative Evaluation of the Fate of EU Citizenship’", Yearbook of European Law, 17 (1997)
  16. Nentwich, M., "Opportunity Structures for Citizens?" (1998), Routledge
  17. Neunreither, K., "Governance Without Opposition: The Case of the European Union", Government and Opposition, 33(4), pp.419~441 (1998)[DOI]
  18. Scharpf, F., "Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?" (1999), Oxford University Press
  19. Shaw, J., "New Legal Dynamics of European Union" (1995), Oxford University Press
  20. Shaw, J., "The Integration of European Union Citizenship", The Modern Law Review, 61(3), pp.293~317 (1998)
  21. Shaw, J., "European Union Citizenship: The IGC and Beyond", European Public Law, 3(3), pp.413~439 (1997)
  22. Schmitter, P., "How to Democratize the European Union … And Why Bother?" (2000), Rowman and Littlefield
  23. Shore, C., "Building Europe; The Cultural Politics of European Integration" (2000), Routledge
  24. Starkey, H., "Changing Citizenship" (2005), Open University Press
  25. Warleigh, A., "Citizenship and Governance in the European Union" (2001)
  26. Warleigh, A., "Democracy in the European Union" (2003), Sage publications
  27. Warleigh, A., "The Hustle: Citizenship Practice, NGOs and “Policy Coalitions” in the European Union – The Cases of Auto Oil, Drinking Water and Unit Pricing", Journal of European Public Policy, 7(2), pp.229~243 (2000)
  28. Weale, A., "Citizenship, Democracy and Justice in the New Europe" (1997), Routledge
  29. Weiner, A., "European Citizenship Practice: Building Institutions of a Non-State" (1998), Westview Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)