연령과 손잡이에 따른 정상인들의 Motor Activity Log-28과 Actual Amount of Use Test 연구 및 Actual Amount of Use Test의 평가자간 신뢰도연구
Studies on Motor Activity Log-28 and Actual Amount of Use Test, Actual Amount of Use Test Inter-rater Reliability in Healthy Individuals: Age Dependence and Handedness
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Spontaneous use of the upper extremities on the affected side of patients with stroke is a meaningful indicator of recovery and may vary by the age or dominant hand of patients. No prior study has reported changes in actual amount of use test (AAUT) and motor activity log (MAL)-28 according to age and handedness in healthy adults, and AAUT inter-rater reliability for assessment of healthy adults. Objects: This study aimed to (1) research the differences in AAUT and MAL-28 according to age and handedness in healthy adults, and (2) determine the inter-rater reliability of the AAUT. Methods: Seventy healthy adults participated in this study. The MAL-28 was assessed by dividing 61 subjects into young right-handed (n1=20), young left-handed (n2=21), and older right-handed (n3=20) groups. The AAUT was assessed by dividing 63 subjects into young right-handed (n1=25), young left-handed (n2=18), and older right-handed (n3=20) groups. Student’s t-test and the Wilcoxon signed- rank test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The Amount of Use (AOU) scale values for each group showed no significant differences between age groups and handedness groups in the MAL-28 (p>.05). The AAUT AOU scale value showed significant differences regarding dominant handedness in the AAUT (p<.05), but no significant differences according to age (p>.05). (2) Inter-rater reliability of the AAUT was excellent, except few items (item 9, 11, and 12). Conclusion: Although both the MAL-28 and the AAUT measured how much participants used their dominant arms in healthy subjects, the AAUT only showed significantly higher dominant arm use in left hander than the right hander. In addition, the inter-rater reliability of the AAUT was excellent. Current results can be utilized as a basic information when clinicians develop rehabilitation strategies, and AAUT was shown to be a reliable evaluation tool for measurement of upper extremity use in Korean adults, based on the reliability demonstrated by this study.
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous use of the upper extremities on the affected side of patients with stroke is a meaningful indicator of recovery and may vary by the age or dominant hand of patients. No prior study has reported changes in actual amount of use test (AAUT) and motor activity log (MAL)-28 according to age and handedness in healthy adults, and AAUT inter-rater reliability for assessment of healthy adults. Objects: This study aimed to (1) research the differences in AAUT and MAL-28 according to age and handedness in healthy adults, and (2) determine the inter-rater reliability of the AAUT. Methods: Seventy healthy adults participated in this study. The MAL-28 was assessed by dividing 61 subjects into young right-handed (n1=20), young left-handed (n2=21), and older right-handed (n3=20) groups. The AAUT was assessed by dividing 63 subjects into young right-handed (n1=25), young left-handed (n2=18), and older right-handed (n3=20) groups. Student’s t-test and the Wilcoxon signed- rank test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The Amount of Use (AOU) scale values for each group showed no significant differences between age groups and handedness groups in the MAL-28 (p>.05). The AAUT AOU scale value showed significant differences regarding dominant handedness in the AAUT (p<.05), but no significant differences according to age (p>.05). (2) Inter-rater reliability of the AAUT was excellent, except few items (item 9, 11, and 12). Conclusion: Although both the MAL-28 and the AAUT measured how much participants used their dominant arms in healthy subjects, the AAUT only showed significantly higher dominant arm use in left hander than the right hander. In addition, the inter-rater reliability of the AAUT was excellent. Current results can be utilized as a basic information when clinicians develop rehabilitation strategies, and AAUT was shown to be a reliable evaluation tool for measurement of upper extremity use in Korean adults, based on the reliability demonstrated by this study.
참고문헌 (27)
- Bard G, "Recovery of voluntary motion in upper extremity following hemiplegia", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 46(46), pp.567~572 (1965)[DOI]
- R. N. Barker, "Upper limb recovery after stroke: The stroke survivors' perspective", Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(20), pp.1213~1223 (2009), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Ruth N. Barker, "Factors contributing to upper limb recovery after stroke: A survey of stroke survivors in Queensland Australia", Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(13), pp.981~989 (2009), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Shuya Chen, "Minimal Detectable Change of the Actual Amount of Use Test and the Motor Activity Log", Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 26(5), pp.507~514 (2012), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Kathleen Y. Haaland, "Relationship Between Arm Usage and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living After Unilateral Stroke", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(11), pp.1957~1962 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Cheol E. Han, "Quantifying Arm Nonuse in Individuals Poststroke", Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 27(5), pp.439~447 (2012), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Tobias Kalisch, "Age-Related Attenuation of Dominant Hand Superiority", PLoS ONE, 1(1), pp.e90~ (2006), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- Sujin Kim, "Measuring Habitual Arm Use Post-stroke With a Bilateral Time-Constrained Reaching Task", Frontiers in Neurology, 9, pp.883~ (2018), Frontiers Media SA[DOI]
- Catherine E. Lang, "Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences of Upper-Extremity Measures Early After Stroke", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(9), pp.1693~1700 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Ryanne JM Lemmens, "Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review", BMC Neurology, 12(1) (2012), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Nancy E. Mayo, "Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(8), pp.1035~1042 (2002), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- David M. Morris, "A Method for Standardizing Procedures in Rehabilitation: Use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(4), pp.663~668 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- T S Olsen, "Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation.", Stroke, 21(2), pp.247~251 (1990), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Si-Woon Park, "The EXCITE Trial: Predicting a Clinically Meaningful Motor Activity Log Outcome", Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22(5), pp.486~493 (2008), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- V. M. Parker, "Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery", International Rehabilitation Medicine, 8(2), pp.69~73 (2009), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Ruth Propper, "Mixed- versus strong right-handedness is associated with biases towards "remember" versus "know" judgements in recognition memory: Role of interhemispheric interaction", Memory, 12(6), pp.707~714 (2004), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- D. Rand, "Arm-Hand Use in Healthy Older Adults", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(6), pp.877~885 (2010), AOTA Press[DOI]
- Jenny K. Rinehart, "Arm Use After Left or Right Hemiparesis Is Influenced by Hand Preference", Stroke, 40(2), pp.545~550 (2009), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Rüdiger J. Seitz, "Spontaneous arm movement activity assessed by accelerometry is a marker for early recovery after stroke", Journal of Neurology, 258(3), pp.457~463 (2011), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Annette Sterr, "Neurobehavioral aspects of recovery: Assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(12), pp.1726~1731 (2002), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Alan Sunderland, "Neuroplasticity, learning and recovery after stroke: A critical evaluation of constraint-induced therapy", Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 15(2), pp.81~96 (2005), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Taub E, "The motor activity log (mal) Manual", Ther Res Gr, pp.1~18 (2011)
- Taub E, "Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74(4), pp.347~354 (1993)
- G. Uswatte, "The Motor Activity Log-28: Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke", Neurology, 67(7), pp.1189~1194 (2006), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Gitendra Uswatte, "Implications of the learned nonuse formulation for measuring rehabilitation outcomes: Lessons from constraint-induced movement therapy.", Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(1), pp.34~42 (2005), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- J.H. van der Lee, "Clinimetric Properties of the Motor Activity Log for the Assessment of Arm Use in Hemiparetic Patients", Stroke, 35(6), pp.1410~1414 (2004), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- D T Wade, "The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery.", Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 46(6), pp.521~524 (1983), BMJ[DOI]