본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Upper Extremity Performance Test for the Elderly (TEMPA)

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objective : This study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Upper Extremity Performance Test for the Elderly (TEMPA) by modifying its items 새 exhibit cultural differences. Methods : This study included 171 healthy adults and older adults and 41 individuals with impaired upper extremity function. Content validity, discriminant validity, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability were analyzed. Results : The following items, exhibiting cultural differences, were modified: “open a lock and take the top off a pillbox”and“write and affix a postage stamp.” The discriminant validity results indicated that participants with normal upper extremity function performed better than those with impaired in the upper extremity function (p<.001). The test-retest reliability of the execution speed (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC) was .71–.94, functional rating (kappa) was 1.0, and task analysis (ICC) was 1.0. The inter-rater reliability of the speed of execution was 1.0, functional rating was .79–1.0, and task analysis was .94–1.0. Conclusion : TEMPA has moderate to high level of reliability and is an assessment tool that can clearly distinguish individuals with upper extremity impairment from those without impairment

Abstract

Objective : This study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Upper Extremity Performance Test for the Elderly (TEMPA) by modifying its items 새 exhibit cultural differences. Methods : This study included 171 healthy adults and older adults and 41 individuals with impaired upper extremity function. Content validity, discriminant validity, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability were analyzed. Results : The following items, exhibiting cultural differences, were modified: “open a lock and take the top off a pillbox”and“write and affix a postage stamp.” The discriminant validity results indicated that participants with normal upper extremity function performed better than those with impaired in the upper extremity function (p<.001). The test-retest reliability of the execution speed (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC) was .71–.94, functional rating (kappa) was 1.0, and task analysis (ICC) was 1.0. The inter-rater reliability of the speed of execution was 1.0, functional rating was .79–1.0, and task analysis was .94–1.0. Conclusion : TEMPA has moderate to high level of reliability and is an assessment tool that can clearly distinguish individuals with upper extremity impairment from those without impairment

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Brown, T., "Construct validity : A unitary concept for occupational therapy assessment and measurement", Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(1), pp.30~42 (2010)[DOI]
  2. Carroll, D., "A quantitative test of upper extremity function", Journal of Chronic Diseases, 18(5), pp.479~491 (1965)[DOI]
  3. Desrosiers, J., "Validation of the box and block test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people : Reliability, validity, and norms studies", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75(7), pp.751~755 (1994)
  4. Desrosiers, J., "Development and reliability of an upper extremity function test for the elderly : The TEMPA", Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(1), pp.9~16 (1993)[DOI]
  5. Desrosiers, J., "Validity of the TEMPA : A measurement instrument for upper extremity performance", Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14(4), pp.267~281 (1994)[DOI]
  6. Desrosiers, J., "The purdue pegboard test : Normative data for people aged 60 and over", Disability and Rehabilitation, 17(5), pp.217~224 (1995)[DOI]
  7. Feys, P., "Validity of the TEMPA for the measurement of upper limb function in multiple sclerosis", Clinical Rehabilitation, 16(2), pp.166~173 (2002)[DOI]
  8. Gonzalez-Calvo, J., "Cultural diversity issues in the development of valid and reliable measures of health status", Arthritis Care and Research : The Official Journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association, 10(6), pp.448~456 (1997)
  9. Jacobson-Sollerman, C., "Grip function of the healthy hand in a standardized hand function test : A study of the rancho los amigos test", Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 9(3), pp.123~129 (1976)
  10. Jebsen, R. H., "An objective and standardized test of hand function", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 50(6), pp.311~ (1969)
  11. Kim, H., "The effects of hand function program on hand function and instrumental activities of daily living", The Journal of Occupational Therapy for the Aged and Dementia, 2(2), pp.1~12 (2008)
  12. Kopp, B., "The arm motor ability test : Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78(6), pp.615~620 (1997)[DOI]
  13. Lee, C. D., "A study of hand function assessment tools in Korean adults : A review", The Journal of Work Ability Association, 1(1), pp.39~50 (2015)
  14. Lemmens, R. J., "Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia : A systematic review", BioMed Central Neurology, 12(1), pp.21~ (2012)[DOI]
  15. Mathiowetz, V., "Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39(6), pp.386~391 (1985)[DOI]
  16. Mathiowetz, V., "Adult norms for the nine hole peg test of finger dexterity", OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 5(1), pp.24~38 (1985)[DOI]
  17. Ogata, S., "Common genetic factors influence hand strength, processing speed, and working memory", Journal of Epidemiology, 24(1), pp.31~38 (2014)[DOI]
  18. Pendleton, M. H., "Pedretti’s occupational therapy: Practice skills for physical dysfunction", pp.2013, Mosby
  19. Polit, D. F., "The content validity index : Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations", Research in Nursing & Health, 29, pp.489~497 (2006)[DOI]
  20. Radomski, M. V., "Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction" (2013), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  21. Ranganathan, V. K., "Effects of aging on hand function", Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49(11), pp.1478~1484 (2001)[DOI]
  22. 유은영, "한국 작업치료사의 영역별 평가도구 사용 동향", 대한작업치료학회지, 14(3), pp.27~37 (2006), 대한작업치료학회
  23. Vliet, V. T., "Determinants of hand function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis", The Journal of Rheumatology, 23(5), pp.835~840 (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)