본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Verification of the Reliability and Validity of a Virtual Reality Cognitive Evaluation System Based on Motion Recognition Analysis Evaluation

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류물리치료학

초록

Background: As social problems due to the acceleration of the aging era and the increase in the elderly population are becoming serious, virtual reality (VR)-based healthcare is emerging as an approach for preventing and managing health issues. Objects: This study used validity and reliability analyses to examine the clinical efficacy that is, the clinical value and usability of a novel VR cognitive evaluation system index that we developed. Methods: We developed a VR cognitive evaluation system based on motion recognition analysis evaluation for individuals aged 65 to 85. After conducting the Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Exam (K-MMSE) cognitive evaluation, the evaluation score was verified through correlation analysis in the VR cognitive evaluation system. To verify the construct validity of the two groups, the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) grades were categorized into a normal cognitive group (GDS grade 1) and a cognitive impairment group (GDS grades 2 and 3). The data were measured twice to determine the reliability between the two measurements and assess the stability and clinical value of the evaluation system. Results: Our evaluation system had a high correlation of 0.85 with the widely used K-MMSE cognitive evaluation. The system had strong criterion-related validity at the 95% confidence interval. Compared to the average score of GDS grade 1 in the VR cognitive evaluation system, the average score of GDS grades 2 and 3 in the VR cognitive evaluation system was statistically significantly lower while also having strong construct validity at the 95% confidence interval. To measure the reliability of the VR cognitive evaluation system, tests–retests were conducted using the intraclass correlation coefficient (3,1), which equaled 0.923 and was statistically significant. Conclusion: The VR cognitive evaluation system we developed is a valid and reliable clinical tool to distinguish between normal cognitive status and mild cognitive impairment.

Abstract

Background: As social problems due to the acceleration of the aging era and the increase in the elderly population are becoming serious, virtual reality (VR)-based healthcare is emerging as an approach for preventing and managing health issues. Objects: This study used validity and reliability analyses to examine the clinical efficacy that is, the clinical value and usability of a novel VR cognitive evaluation system index that we developed. Methods: We developed a VR cognitive evaluation system based on motion recognition analysis evaluation for individuals aged 65 to 85. After conducting the Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Exam (K-MMSE) cognitive evaluation, the evaluation score was verified through correlation analysis in the VR cognitive evaluation system. To verify the construct validity of the two groups, the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) grades were categorized into a normal cognitive group (GDS grade 1) and a cognitive impairment group (GDS grades 2 and 3). The data were measured twice to determine the reliability between the two measurements and assess the stability and clinical value of the evaluation system. Results: Our evaluation system had a high correlation of 0.85 with the widely used K-MMSE cognitive evaluation. The system had strong criterion-related validity at the 95% confidence interval. Compared to the average score of GDS grade 1 in the VR cognitive evaluation system, the average score of GDS grades 2 and 3 in the VR cognitive evaluation system was statistically significantly lower while also having strong construct validity at the 95% confidence interval. To measure the reliability of the VR cognitive evaluation system, tests–retests were conducted using the intraclass correlation coefficient (3,1), which equaled 0.923 and was statistically significant. Conclusion: The VR cognitive evaluation system we developed is a valid and reliable clinical tool to distinguish between normal cognitive status and mild cognitive impairment.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. clinical psychiatry, "Kaplan and Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: behavioral sciences", pp.1998, Kaplan HI
  2. 김재민, "치매 선별을 위한 MMSE-K와 K-MMSE의 진단 타당도 비교", 신경정신의학, 42(1), pp.124~130 (2003), 대한신경정신의학회
  3. Howett D, "Differentiation of mild cognitive impairment using an entorhinal cortex-based test of virtual reality navigation", Brain, 142(6), pp.1751~1766 (2019)
  4. 김민영, "가상현실을 이용한 노인의 인지기능 훈련 효과", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 29(4), pp.424~433 (2005), 대한재활의학회
  5. Ge S, "Technology-based cognitive training and rehabilitation interventions for individuals with mild cognitive impairment : a systematic review", BMC Geriatr, 18(1), pp.213~ (2018)
  6. Ju Y, "Systematic review of virtual reality based rehabilitation for dementia", J Korean Soc Cogn Rehabil, 9(1), pp.61~80 (2020)
  7. Cogné M, "Are visual cues helpful for virtual spatial navigation and spatial memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease?", Neuropsychology, 32(4), pp.385~400 (2018)
  8. 김두리, "치매안심센터를 이용하는 지역사회 노인들의 가상현실기반 뇌채움 인지훈련이 인지기능에 미치는 효과", 고령자・치매작업치료학회지, 14(2), pp.1~10 (2020), 고령자・치매작업치료학회
  9. Zając-Lamparska L, "Effects of virtual reality-based cognitive training in older adults living without and with mild dementia : a pretest-posttest design pilot study", BMC Res Notes, 12(1), pp.776~ (2019)
  10. Marquardt G, "Impact of the design of the built environment on people with dementia : an evidencebased review", HERD, 8(1), pp.127~157 (2014)
  11. 최성혜, "한국판 Global Deterioration Scale의 타당도", 대한신경과학회지, 20(6), pp.612~617 (2002), 대한신경과학회
  12. 황도연, "뇌졸중 환자를 대상으로 한 인지선별검사(CIST), 한국판 간이정신상태검사 2판(K-MMSE~2) 및 임상치매척도(CDR)의 상관성", 재활치료과학, 11(2), pp.53~62 (2022), 대한신경계작업치료학회[DOI]
  13. Kim SY, "Clinical features and treatment of mild cognitive impairment", Korean J Clin Geriatr Korea Soc Geriatr Dis Spring Acad Conf, 7(1), pp.22~33 (2006)
  14. Jeong JY, "Memory failure patients old man, how will you do it?", Korean Acad Clin Genet Fall Symp, 3(8), pp.352~362 (2007)
  15. 김덕용, "3차원 가상현실 프로그램을 이용한 뇌졸중 환자의 인지기능 장애 평가", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 33(1), pp.12~20 (2009), 대한재활의학회

관련 논문AI추천

경도인지장애 선별 평가를 위한 가상현실 인지기능평가의 개발: 예비 연구이은, 강민재, 김우정, 노현웅, 석정호, 손상준, 장수아, 채헌주, 최선우대한신경정신의학회 · 신경정신의학2022 · 제61권 제3호Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Cognitive Training in the Elderly with and without Mild Cognitive ImpairmentBae Jae Nam, Cho Seo-Eun, Cho Seong-Jin, Hong Jin Pyo, Kang Jae Myeong, Kim Hyeyoung, Kim Won-Hyoung, Maeng Seri, Na Kyoung-Sae, Oh Seok-Hee, Park Jung Woon대한신경정신의학회 · PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION2021 · 제18권 제7호3차원 가상현실 프로그램을 이용한 뇌졸중 환자의 인지기능 장애 평가김덕용, 박기덕, 박창일, 박태훈, 이장한, 정강재, 주소영대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2009 · 제33권 제1호가상현실(VR)과 증강현실(AR)을 활용한 치매 관리 방법의 탐색: 문헌고찰을 중심으로강지은, 김귀현, 김정원, 옥혜영, 장대원, 최은영경영연구원 · 의료경영학연구2025 · 제19권 제3호기능성 게임을 활용한 경도인지장애 선별 도구에 대한 체계적 고찰노수림, 심예린, 윤대현, 이경주, 전봄이, 조성근한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2024 · 제29권 제6호가상현실(Virtual Reality) 콘텐츠를 활용한 인지재활프로그램이 노인의 인지기능, 우울감, 상지기능 및 일상생활능력에 미치는 영향김금숙, 김영준, 박진홍, 조영석중소기업융합학회 · 융합정보논문지2020 · 제10권 제8호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)