EU Arctic Strategy effects on Arctic Policy of Sweden and Finland - Focusing on the Monitoring System and Education
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Arctic coastal countries that currently belong to the EU are Denmark, Sweden, and Finland, which share interests with several countries. Among them, Sweden and Finland have similar contexts in terms of cultural homogeneity and quality of life, so it is advantageous to draw a very meaningful conclusion as a comparison group. The EU has shown a movement to seek sustainable aspects of development and peaceful solutions while establishing environmental governance. EU policy has influenced Sweden and Finland, especially in terms of their own monitoring systems and education. In this paper, the meaning of the Arctic region in the EU and its strategies will be reviewed in Sweden and Finland. This paper assumes that Sweden and Finland share the same perception on environmental issues. Based on this, it will be emphasized more about the differences in the policies between the two countries by the intervention of other external variables. After that, this thesis will be concluded by inferring subtle differences in the surveillance system and educational direction among the Arctic policies of Sweden and Finland. Both countries have the same priorities to take the lead in the discussion of environmental issues. In the difference in method between two countries, Sweden tries to negotiate when a dispute over the Arctic arises in the international community by proving this effect through official proposal to try to get a solid position. However, Finland focuses on external relationship with other stakeholders to extend their influence to other nations. So, in the question of which country is more aggressive in the struggle for dominance, it can be seen that Finland is more active.
Abstract
The Arctic coastal countries that currently belong to the EU are Denmark, Sweden, and Finland, which share interests with several countries. Among them, Sweden and Finland have similar contexts in terms of cultural homogeneity and quality of life, so it is advantageous to draw a very meaningful conclusion as a comparison group. The EU has shown a movement to seek sustainable aspects of development and peaceful solutions while establishing environmental governance. EU policy has influenced Sweden and Finland, especially in terms of their own monitoring systems and education. In this paper, the meaning of the Arctic region in the EU and its strategies will be reviewed in Sweden and Finland. This paper assumes that Sweden and Finland share the same perception on environmental issues. Based on this, it will be emphasized more about the differences in the policies between the two countries by the intervention of other external variables. After that, this thesis will be concluded by inferring subtle differences in the surveillance system and educational direction among the Arctic policies of Sweden and Finland. Both countries have the same priorities to take the lead in the discussion of environmental issues. In the difference in method between two countries, Sweden tries to negotiate when a dispute over the Arctic arises in the international community by proving this effect through official proposal to try to get a solid position. However, Finland focuses on external relationship with other stakeholders to extend their influence to other nations. So, in the question of which country is more aggressive in the struggle for dominance, it can be seen that Finland is more active.
참고문헌 (19)
- "Memorandum to European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker (2015), For An Ambitious EU Arctic and Northern policy", ~ (2015)
- Jack Kohler, "A long-term Arctic snow depth record from Abisko, northern Sweden, 1913–2004", Polar Research, 25(2), pp.91~113 (2006), Norwegian Polar Institute[DOI]
- Swedish polar research secretariat, "Abisko Scientific Research Station - Swedish polar research secretariat Finnish Environment Institute (syke.fi)", ~
- "Finland’s Strategy for the Arctic Region 2013, Government resolution on 23 August 2013", Prime Minister’s Office Finland, ~ (2013)
- B. Adlard, "Future directions for monitoring and human health research for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme", Global Health Action, 11(1), pp.1480084~ (2018), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Ulf Jonsell, "Recent air and ground temperature increases at Tarfala Research Station, Sweden", Polar research, 32(2013), pp.1~ (2013)
- Kristine Offerdal, "The EU in the Arctic : In Pursuit of Legitimacy and Influenc", 66(4), pp.861~877 (2011)
- Seo Hyun-kyo, "Awareness of the Korean Peninsula - Europe, Europe's Arctic Strategy Discussion and Policy Direction", 2017~2040 (2017)
- Christian Bigler, "Quantitative multiproxy assessment of long-term patterns of Holocene environmental change from a small lake near Abisko, northern Sweden", The Holocene, 12(4), pp.481~496 (2002), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Mats Sonesson, "Abisko Scientific Research Station: Environment and Research", Ecography, 2(4), pp.279~283 (2010), Wiley[DOI]
- Government Offices of Sweden, "Sweden’s Strategy for the arctic region", UD11.041, 8~ (2011)
- Ulf Molau, "Onset of flowering and climate variability in an alpine landscape : a 10-year study from Swedish Lapland", American journal of Botany, 92(3) (2005)[DOI]
- 장선화, "북유럽 정당체제와 탈근대적 변화: 스웨덴, 노르웨이, 핀란드를 중심으로", 비교민주주의연구, 14(1), pp.115~141 (2018), 민주주의와 자치 연구소[DOI]
- 한정훈, "2019년유럽의회선거에서녹색당의성패와선거의범유럽화: 스웨덴과 핀란드 사례 비교", 유럽연구, 38(2), pp.29~58 (2020), 한국유럽학회[DOI]
- 정혁, "유럽연합의 북극 지역 단명기후오염원(short-lived climate pollutants)배출량 감축 정책의 변화와 과제: 유럽연합지침을 중심으로", 세계지역연구논총, 39(1), pp.107~136 (2021), 한국세계지역학회[DOI]
- 김봉철, "유럽의 북극지역 관련 갈등 해결을 위한 법과 정책", EU연구, (57), pp.35~62 (2021), EU연구소[DOI]
- KIEP Korea Institute for Foreign Policy, "Measures to expand cooperation and characteristics of the Nordic economy: Sweden, Finland and Norway", ~ (2019)
- S. Berg, "Comparison of greenhouse gas emissions from forest operations in Finland and Sweden", Forestry, 76(3), pp.271~284 (2003), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- "Government Offices of Swede", ~ (2011)