연명치료중단에 대한 사회복지사의 태도
Attitude of Social workers toward Withdrawal 0f Life Sustaining Treatment
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose : This study is conducted to research the attitude of social workers toward withdrawing life sustaining treatment and compare and analyze the different types of their attitudes. Methods : Research design of this study is Q methodology approach. The study population is 23 social workers. Q sample to investigate the attitude of social workers toward withdrawing life sustaining treatment included 30 statements. After listening to the purpose and method of the study, the 23 social workers agreed to fill out a survey asking sociodemographic information and have been forced to be distributed in 9 scale Q-sample. Results : The collected data was processed through QUANL PC program, sorted into 3 types as followings. The first type was ’the pursuit of quality of life’ that the quality of life is more important than the length of life , the second ‘choosing to withdraw life sustaining treatment’ that they want to write or encourage family to write advanced directive, the third ‘withholding life sustaining treatment’ regardless of the cost, Conclusion : In conclusion, the social workers attitudes toward withdrawing life sustaining treatment were grouped as three different types, the first type was ’the pursuit of quality of life’, the second ‘choosing to withdraw life sustaining treatment’, the third ‘withholding life sustaining treatment’
Abstract
Purpose : This study is conducted to research the attitude of social workers toward withdrawing life sustaining treatment and compare and analyze the different types of their attitudes. Methods : Research design of this study is Q methodology approach. The study population is 23 social workers. Q sample to investigate the attitude of social workers toward withdrawing life sustaining treatment included 30 statements. After listening to the purpose and method of the study, the 23 social workers agreed to fill out a survey asking sociodemographic information and have been forced to be distributed in 9 scale Q-sample. Results : The collected data was processed through QUANL PC program, sorted into 3 types as followings. The first type was ’the pursuit of quality of life’ that the quality of life is more important than the length of life , the second ‘choosing to withdraw life sustaining treatment’ that they want to write or encourage family to write advanced directive, the third ‘withholding life sustaining treatment’ regardless of the cost, Conclusion : In conclusion, the social workers attitudes toward withdrawing life sustaining treatment were grouped as three different types, the first type was ’the pursuit of quality of life’, the second ‘choosing to withdraw life sustaining treatment’, the third ‘withholding life sustaining treatment’
참고문헌 (12)
- 김학태, "죽음의 의미와 결정에 관한 법윤리적 고찰 - 『호스피스⦁완화의료 및 임종과정에 있는 환자의 연명의료결정에 관한 법률』의 쟁점과 비판 -", 외법논집, 41(1), pp.411~440 (2017), 법학연구소[DOI]
- "Supreme Court 2004. 6. 24. sentence 2002do995", ~ (2004)
- "Supreme Court 2009. 5. 21. sentence 2009da 17417", ~ (2009)
- The Hospice, "Palliative Care, and Life-sustaining Treatment Decision-making Act", ~ (2018)
- 선종수, "「연명의료결정법」의 문제점과 향후 과제", 형사법의 신동향, (55), pp.163~190 (2017), 대검찰청[DOI]
- 김민우, "연명치료중단의 허용요건에 관한 법적 쟁점과 과제", 유럽헌법연구, (24), pp.357~390 (2017), 유럽헌법학회
- H. K. Kim, "Q methodology", pp.1~129 (2008), Communication books
- 이경남, "한국 변호사들의 연명치료중단에 대한 태도", Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care, 13(2), pp.81~88 (2010), 한국호스피스완화의료학회
- 박승호, "연명의료중단등결정에 관한 몇 가지 쟁점", 아주법학, 11(4), pp.176~208 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 권성애, "사회복지사의 사전의료계획(Advance Care Planning)태도에 미치는 영향연구", 보건사회연구, 36(4), pp.284~313 (2016), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
- 윤은자, "의료인과 일반인의 연명치료에 대한 태도 : 상호지향성 모형을 중심으로", 한국웰니스학회지, 11(2), pp.1~14 (2016), 한국웰니스학회
- 김상현, "무의미한 연명치료 중단에 대한 중환자 전담의사의 인식: 포커스그룹 인터뷰를 중심으로", 한국의료윤리학회지, 15(3), pp.370~384 (2012), 한국의료윤리학회[DOI]
