Determination of optimal energy system and level for growing pigs
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study mainly evaluated the responses in growth performance of growing pigs to different energy systems and energy levels in diets. Subsequently, we compared the nutrient digestibility and digestible nutrient concentrations of each energy level diet. In experiment 1, a total of 144 growing pigs with an average initial body weight (BW) of 26.69 ± 7.39 kg were randomly allotted to six dietary treatments (four pigs/pen; six replicates/treatment) according to a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement resulting from two energy systems (metabolizable energy [ME] and net energy [NE]) and three energy levels (low [LE], recommended [C], and high energy [HE]). Pigs were fed the experimental diets for 6 weeks and were allowed free access to feed and water during the experimental period. In experiment 2, 12 growing pigs with an average initial BW of 27.0 ± 1.8 kg were randomly allotted to individual metabolism crates and fed the six diets in a replicated 6 × 6 Latin square design. The six dietary treatments were identical to those used in the growth trial. Pigs were fed their respective diets at 2.5 times the estimated energy requirement for maintenance per day, and this was divided into two equal meals provided twice per day during the experimental period. Differences in energy systems and energy levels had no significant effect on the growth performance or nutrient digestibility (except acid-hydrolyzed ether extract [AEE]) of growing pigs in the current study. However, the digestible concentrations of ether extract, AEE, and acid detergent fiber (g/kg dry matter [DM]) in diets significantly increased (p < 0.05) with increasing energy levels. Additionally, there was a tendency (p = 0.09) for an increase in the digestible crude protein content (g/kg DM) as the energy content of the diet increased. Consequently, differences in energy systems and levels did not affect the BW, average daily gain, and average daily feed intake of growing pigs. This implies that a higher variation in dietary energy levels may be required to significantly affect growth performance and nutrient digestibility when considering digestible nutrient concentrations.
Abstract
This study mainly evaluated the responses in growth performance of growing pigs to different energy systems and energy levels in diets. Subsequently, we compared the nutrient digestibility and digestible nutrient concentrations of each energy level diet. In experiment 1, a total of 144 growing pigs with an average initial body weight (BW) of 26.69 ± 7.39 kg were randomly allotted to six dietary treatments (four pigs/pen; six replicates/treatment) according to a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement resulting from two energy systems (metabolizable energy [ME] and net energy [NE]) and three energy levels (low [LE], recommended [C], and high energy [HE]). Pigs were fed the experimental diets for 6 weeks and were allowed free access to feed and water during the experimental period. In experiment 2, 12 growing pigs with an average initial BW of 27.0 ± 1.8 kg were randomly allotted to individual metabolism crates and fed the six diets in a replicated 6 × 6 Latin square design. The six dietary treatments were identical to those used in the growth trial. Pigs were fed their respective diets at 2.5 times the estimated energy requirement for maintenance per day, and this was divided into two equal meals provided twice per day during the experimental period. Differences in energy systems and energy levels had no significant effect on the growth performance or nutrient digestibility (except acid-hydrolyzed ether extract [AEE]) of growing pigs in the current study. However, the digestible concentrations of ether extract, AEE, and acid detergent fiber (g/kg dry matter [DM]) in diets significantly increased (p < 0.05) with increasing energy levels. Additionally, there was a tendency (p = 0.09) for an increase in the digestible crude protein content (g/kg DM) as the energy content of the diet increased. Consequently, differences in energy systems and levels did not affect the BW, average daily gain, and average daily feed intake of growing pigs. This implies that a higher variation in dietary energy levels may be required to significantly affect growth performance and nutrient digestibility when considering digestible nutrient concentrations.
참고문헌 (39)
- Noblet J, "Prediction of net energy value of feeds for growing pigs", J Anim Sci, 72, pp.344~354 (1994)[DOI]
- de Lange CFM, "Characterization of useful energy content in swine and poultry feed ingredients", Can J Anim Sci, 85, pp.269~280 (2005)[DOI]
- Moehn S, "Using net energy for diet formulation : potential for the Canadian pig industry", Adv Pork Prod, 16, pp.119~129 (2005)
- Lee JJ, "Dietary protease improves growth rate and protein digestibility of growing-finishing pigs", J Anim Sci Technol, 62, pp.313~320 (2020)[DOI]
- Song M, "Effects of dietary protease supplementation on growth rate, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal morphology of weaned pigs", J Anim Sci Technol, 64, pp.462~470 (2022)[DOI]
- Fang LH, "Effects of dietary energy and crude protein levels on growth performance, blood profiles, and carcass traits in growingfinishing pigs", J Anim Sci Technol, 61, pp.204~215 (2019)[DOI]
- Liu Y, "Supplementation of different fat sources affects growth performance and carcass composition of finishing pigs", J Anim Sci Biotechnol, 9, pp.56~ (2018)[DOI]
- Beaulieu AD, "Response to dietary digestible energy concentration in growing pigs fed cereal grain-based diets", J Anim Sci, 87, pp.965~976 (2009)[DOI]
- Kong C, "Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets", Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 27, pp.917~925 (2014)[DOI]
- Song M, "Value of spray-dried egg in pig nursery diets", Korean J Agric Sci, 42, pp.207~213 (2015)[DOI]
- Emmans GC, "A quantitative biology of the pig", pp.363~377 (1999), CABI
- Velayudhan DE, "Characterization of dietary energy in Swine feed and feed ingredients : a review of recent research results", Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 28, pp.1~13 (2015)[DOI]
- Birkett S, "A computational framework for a nutrient flow representation of energy utilization by growing monogastric animals", Br J Nutr, 86, pp.661~674 (2001)[DOI]
- NRC, "Nutrient requirements of swine" (2012), National Academies Press
- Kil DY, "Feed energy evaluation for growing pigs", Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 26, pp.1205~1217 (2013)[DOI]
- Rijnen MMJA, "Effects of two different dietary fermentable carbohydrates on activity and heat production in group-housed growing pigs", J Anim Sci, 81, pp.1210~1219 (2003)[DOI]
- Rijnen MMJA, "The application of the net energy system for swine", Western Nutrition Conference (2004)
- Heo JM, "Determination of the net energy content of canola meal from Brassica napus yellow and Brassica juncea yellow fed to growing pigs using indirect calorimetry", Anim Sci J, 85, pp.751~756 (2014)[DOI]
- Li Z, "Methodologies on estimating the energy requirements for maintenance and determining the net energy contents of feed ingredients in swine : a review of recent work", J Anim Sci Biotechnol, 9, pp.39~ (2018)[DOI]
- Kil DY, "Net energy of soybean oil and choice white grease in diets fed to growing and finishing pigs", J Anim Sci, 89, pp.448~459 (2011)[DOI]
- NRC, "Nutrient requirement of swine" (1998), National Academies Press
- Lee GI, "Growth performance of early finishing gilts as affected by different net energy concentrations in diets", Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 28, pp.1614~1623 (2015)[DOI]
- Ragland D, "Nutritional evaluation of two agroindustrial by-products for ducks and pigs", J Anim Sci, 76, pp.2845~2852 (1998)[DOI]
- AOAC International, "International", 2007
- Adeola O, "Swine nutrition", pp.903~916 (2001), CRC Press
- Park S, "Growth performance and nutrient digestibility of growing-finishing pigs under different energy concentrations", Korean J Agric Sci, 47, pp.275~282 (2020)[DOI]
- Nyachoti CM, "Voluntary feed intake in growingfinishing pigs : a review of the main determining factors and potential approaches for accurate predictions", Can J Anim Sci, 84, pp.549~566 (2004)[DOI]
- Li Q, Patience JF, "Factors involved in the regulation of feed and energy intake of pigs", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 233, pp.22~33 (2017)[DOI]
- Henry Y, "Dietary factors involved in feed intake regulation in growing pigs : a review", Livest Prod Sci, 12, pp.339~354 (1985)[DOI]
- Quiniou N, "Effect of the dietary net energy concentration on feed intake and performance of growing-finishing pigs housed individually", J Anim Sci, 90, pp.4362~4372 (2012)[DOI]
- Pettigrew JE, "Swine nutrition", pp.133~145 (1991), Butterworth-Heinemann
- Kil DY, "Effect of the form of dietary fat and the concentration of dietary neutral detergent fiber on ileal and total tract endogenous losses and apparent and true digestibility of fat by growing pigs", J Anim Sci, 88, pp.2959~2967 (2010)[DOI]
- De la Llata M, "Effects of dietary fat on growth performance and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs reared in a commercial environment", J Anim Sci, 79, pp.2643~2650 (2001)[DOI]
- Bertin C, "Structure and properties of sugar beet fibres", J Sci Food Agric, 44, pp.15~29 (1988)[DOI]
- Kyriazakis I, "The voluntary feed intake of pigs given feeds based on wheat bran, dried citrus pulp and grass meal, in relation to measurements of feed bulk", Br J Nutr, 73, pp.191~207 (1995)[DOI]
- Anguita M, "Effect of coarse ground corn, sugar beet pulp and wheat bran on the voluntary intake and physicochemical characteristics of digesta of growing pigs", Livest Sci, 107, pp.182~191 (2007)[DOI]
- Yin YL, "Apparent digestibility (ileal and overall) of nutrients and endogenous nitrogen losses in growing pigs fed wheat (var. Soissons) or its by-products without or with xylanase supplementation", Livest Prod Sci, 62, pp.119~132 (2000)[DOI]
- Le Goff G, "Comparative total tract digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows", J Anim Sci, 79, pp.2418~2427 (2001)[DOI]
- Azain MJ, "Swine nutrition", pp.95~106 (2001), CRC Press