Exosomes isolation from bovine serum: qualitative and quantitative comparison between ultracentrifugation, combination ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography, and exoEasy methods
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Exosomes have been extensively studied as disease biomarker in humans, given their role in transporting bioactive molecules. However, despite the great potential of exosomes as noninvasive diagnostic markers and therapeutic nanocarriers for bovine diseases, few studies have been conducted on bovine exosome. Thus, this study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively compare three isolation methods to identify a suitable method for bovine serum. Exosomes were isolated using ultracentrifugation alone (UC), a combination of ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography (US), or membrane affinity-based exoEasy kit (EE). Isolated particles were evaluated using a range of complementary techniques. Transmission electron microscopy showed that all three isolation methods resulted in particles with a cupshaped morphology. The particle concentration measured by nanoparticle trafficking analyzer of US was lower compared to those of UC and EE method. As a result of immunoblotting, exosome markers including TSG101, CD81, and HSP70 were detected in US particles, while in UC and EE, only TSG101 expression was confirmed. Particles isolated from UC and EE showed a contamination with the blood protein albumin, whereas particles from US did not show albumin contamination. In addition, to evaluate the possibility of using exosomes as biomarkers, the profiles of the small RNA in the exosomes were compared using the bioanalyzer 2100. As a result, in the EE method, the band of small RNA (25-200 nt) was most prominent, and in the US methods, a distinct band was observed in the small RNA range. Collectively, the purity of exosomes without non-exosomal contamination was highest in the US method. However, for the detection of small RNA, the EE method was found to be the most suitable. Therefore, the results suggest that the optimal isolation method varies depending on the specific purpose of exosome isolation.
Abstract
Exosomes have been extensively studied as disease biomarker in humans, given their role in transporting bioactive molecules. However, despite the great potential of exosomes as noninvasive diagnostic markers and therapeutic nanocarriers for bovine diseases, few studies have been conducted on bovine exosome. Thus, this study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively compare three isolation methods to identify a suitable method for bovine serum. Exosomes were isolated using ultracentrifugation alone (UC), a combination of ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography (US), or membrane affinity-based exoEasy kit (EE). Isolated particles were evaluated using a range of complementary techniques. Transmission electron microscopy showed that all three isolation methods resulted in particles with a cupshaped morphology. The particle concentration measured by nanoparticle trafficking analyzer of US was lower compared to those of UC and EE method. As a result of immunoblotting, exosome markers including TSG101, CD81, and HSP70 were detected in US particles, while in UC and EE, only TSG101 expression was confirmed. Particles isolated from UC and EE showed a contamination with the blood protein albumin, whereas particles from US did not show albumin contamination. In addition, to evaluate the possibility of using exosomes as biomarkers, the profiles of the small RNA in the exosomes were compared using the bioanalyzer 2100. As a result, in the EE method, the band of small RNA (25-200 nt) was most prominent, and in the US methods, a distinct band was observed in the small RNA range. Collectively, the purity of exosomes without non-exosomal contamination was highest in the US method. However, for the detection of small RNA, the EE method was found to be the most suitable. Therefore, the results suggest that the optimal isolation method varies depending on the specific purpose of exosome isolation.
참고문헌 (37)
- Mathivanan S, "Exosomes : extracellular organelles important in intercellular communication", J Proteomics, 73, pp.1907~1920 (2010)[DOI]
- Raposo G, "Extracellular vesicles : exosomes, microvesicles, and friends", J Cell Biol, 200, pp.373~383 (2013)[DOI]
- Li J, "An update on isolation methods for proteomic studies of extracellular vesicles in biofluids", Molecules, 24, pp.3516~ (2019)[DOI]
- Gurung S, "The exosome journey : from biogenesis to uptake and intracellular signalling", Cell Commun Signal, 19, pp.47~ (2021)[DOI]
- Simons M, "Exosomes – vesicular carriers for intercellular communication", Curr Opin Cell Biol, 21, pp.575~581 (2009)[DOI]
- Xu R, "Extracellular vesicle isolation and characterization: toward clinical application", J Clin Invest, 126, pp.1152~1162 (2016)[DOI]
- Zhang Y, "Exosomes : biogenesis, biologic function and clinical potential", Cell Biosci, 9, pp.19~ (2019)[DOI]
- Zhou B, "Application of exosomes as liquid biopsy in clinical diagnosis", Signal Transduct Target Ther, 5, pp.144~ (2020)[DOI]
- Chen J, "Review on strategies and technologies for exosome isolation and purification", Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 9, pp.811971~ (2021)[DOI]
- Yakubovich EI, "Principles and problems of exosome isolation from biological fluids", Biochem(Mosc)Suppl Ser A Membr Cell Biol, 16, pp.115~126 (2022)[DOI]
- Li P, "Progress in exosome isolation techniques", Theranostics, 7, pp.789~804 (2017)[DOI]
- plasma proteomics: methods and protocols, "Serum", pp.2011, Taylor DD
- Van Deun J, "The impact of disparate isolation methods for extracellular vesicles on downstream RNA profiling", J Extracell Vesicles, 3, pp.24858~ (2014)[DOI]
- Perakis S, "Emerging concepts in liquid biopsies", BMC Med, 15, pp.75~ (2017)[DOI]
- Brennan K, "A comparison of methods for the isolation and separation of extracellular vesicles from protein and lipid particles in human serum", Sci Rep, 10, pp.1039~ (2020)[DOI]
- Macías M, "Comparison of six commercial serum exosome isolation methods suitable for clinical laboratories. Effect in cytokine analysis", Clin Chem Lab Med, 57, pp.1539~1545 (2019)[DOI]
- Poór M, "Quantitation of species differences in albumin–ligand interactions for bovine, human and rat serum albumins using fluorescence spectroscopy : a test case with some Sudlow’s site I ligands", J Lumin, 145, pp.767~773 (2014)[DOI]
- Tóthová C, "Evaluation of the differences in the serum protein electrophoretic pattern in precolostral serum of farm animal neonates", Agriculture, 13, pp.1035~ (2023)[DOI]
- Lawrence SH, "A species comparison of serum proteins and enzymes by starch gel electrophoresis", Proc Soc Exp Biol Med, 105, pp.572~575 (1960)[DOI]
- Rahman MM, "Proteomic profiling of milk small extracellular vesicles from bovine leukemia virus-infected cattle", Sci Rep, 11, pp.2951~ (2021)[DOI]
- Almughlliq FB, "Effect of exosomes from plasma of dairy cows with or without an infected uterus on prostaglandin production by endometrial cell lines", J Dairy Sci, 100, pp.9143~9152 (2017)[DOI]
- Wijenayake S, "Comparison of methods for pre-processing, exosome isolation, and RNA extraction in unpasteurized bovine and human milk", PLOS ONE, 16, pp.e0257633~ (2021)[DOI]
- Koh YQ, "Exosome enrichment by ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography", Front Biosci(Landmark Ed), 23, pp.865~874 (2018)[DOI]
- Helwa I, "A comparative study of serum exosome isolation using differential ultracentrifugation and three commercial reagents", PLOS ONE, 12, pp.e0170628~ (2017)[DOI]
- Stranska R, "Comparison of membrane affinity-based method with size-exclusion chromatography for isolation of exosome-like vesicles from human plasma", J Transl Med, 16, pp.1~ (2018)[DOI]
- Enderle D, "Characterization of RNA from exosomes and other extracellular vesicles isolated by a novel spin column-based method", PLOS ONE, 10, pp.e0136133~ (2015)[DOI]
- Alameldin S, "Coupling size exclusion chromatography to ultracentrifugation improves detection of exosomal proteins from human plasma by LC-MS", Pract Lab Med, 26, pp.e00241~ (2021)[DOI]
- Tang YT, "Comparison of isolation methods of exosomes and exosomal RNA from cell culture medium and serum", Int J Mol Med, 40, pp.834~844 (2017)[DOI]
- Aswad H, "Depleting extracellular vesicles from fetal bovine serum alters proliferation and differentiation of skeletal muscle cells in vitro", BMC Biotechnol, 16, pp.32~ (2016)[DOI]
- Tang YT, "Comparison of isolation methods of exosomes and exosomal RNA from cell culture medium and serum", Int J Mol Med, 40, pp.834~844 (2017)[DOI]
- Sidhom K, "A review of exosomal isolation methods : is size exclusion chromatography the best option?", Int J Mol Sci, 21, pp.6466~ (2020)[DOI]
- Sung JJ, "Transmission electron microscopy as an orthogonal method to characterize protein aggregates", J Pharm Sci, 104, pp.750~759 (2015)[DOI]
- Paget D, "Comparative and integrated analysis of plasma extracellular vesicle isolation methods in healthy volunteers and patients following myocardial infarction", J Extracell Biol, 1, pp.e66~ (2022)[DOI]
- Baranyai T, "Isolation of exosomes from blood plasma : qualitative and quantitative comparison of ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography methods", PLOS ONE, 10, pp.e0145686~ (2015)[DOI]
- Deng F, "A review on protein markers of exosome from different bio-resources and the antibodies used for characterization", J Histotechnol, 42, pp.226~239 (2019)[DOI]
- Kowal J, "Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes", Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 113, pp.E968~E977 (2016)[DOI]
- Wei R, "Combination of size-exclusion chromatography and ultracentrifugation improves the proteomic profiling of plasma-derived small extracellular vesicles", Biol Proced Online, 22, pp.12~ (2020)[DOI]
