Validation of the Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Distal Bile Duct Carcinoma
3
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose T category of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for distal bile duct carcinoma (DBDC) was changed to include tumor invasion depth measurement, while the N category adopted a 3-tier classification system based on the number of metastatic nodes. Materials and Methods To validate cancer staging, a total of 200 surgically resected DBDCs were staged and compared according to the seventh and eighth editions. Results T categories included T1 (n=37, 18.5%), T2 (n=114, 57.0%), and T3 (n=49, 24.5%). N categories included N0 (n=133, 66.5%), N1 (n=50, 25.0%), and N2 (n=17, 8.5%). Stage groupings included I (n=33, 16.5%), II (n=150, 75.0%), and III (n=17, 8.5%). The overall 5-year survival rates (5-YSRs) of T1, T2, and T3 were 59.3%, 42.4%, and 12.2%, respectively. T category could discriminate patient survival by both pairwise (T1 and T2, p=0.011; T2 and T3, p < 0.001) and overall (p < 0.001) comparisons. The overall 5-YSRs of N0, N1, and N2 were 47.3%, 17.0%, and 14.7%, respectively. N category could partly discriminate patient survival by both pairwise (N0 and N1, p < 0.001; N1 and N2, p=0.579) and overall (p < 0.001) comparisons. The overall 5-YSRs of stages I, II, and III were 59.0%, 35.4%, and 14.7%, respectively. Stages could distinguish patient survival by both pairwise (I and II, p=0.002; II and III, p=0.015) and overall (p < 0.001) comparisons. On multivariate analyses, T and N categories (p=0.014 and p=0.029) and pancreatic invasion (p=0.006) remained significant prognostic factors. Conclusion The T and N categories of the eighth edition AJCC staging system for DBDC accurately predict patient prognosis.
Abstract
Purpose T category of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for distal bile duct carcinoma (DBDC) was changed to include tumor invasion depth measurement, while the N category adopted a 3-tier classification system based on the number of metastatic nodes. Materials and Methods To validate cancer staging, a total of 200 surgically resected DBDCs were staged and compared according to the seventh and eighth editions. Results T categories included T1 (n=37, 18.5%), T2 (n=114, 57.0%), and T3 (n=49, 24.5%). N categories included N0 (n=133, 66.5%), N1 (n=50, 25.0%), and N2 (n=17, 8.5%). Stage groupings included I (n=33, 16.5%), II (n=150, 75.0%), and III (n=17, 8.5%). The overall 5-year survival rates (5-YSRs) of T1, T2, and T3 were 59.3%, 42.4%, and 12.2%, respectively. T category could discriminate patient survival by both pairwise (T1 and T2, p=0.011; T2 and T3, p < 0.001) and overall (p < 0.001) comparisons. The overall 5-YSRs of N0, N1, and N2 were 47.3%, 17.0%, and 14.7%, respectively. N category could partly discriminate patient survival by both pairwise (N0 and N1, p < 0.001; N1 and N2, p=0.579) and overall (p < 0.001) comparisons. The overall 5-YSRs of stages I, II, and III were 59.0%, 35.4%, and 14.7%, respectively. Stages could distinguish patient survival by both pairwise (I and II, p=0.002; II and III, p=0.015) and overall (p < 0.001) comparisons. On multivariate analyses, T and N categories (p=0.014 and p=0.029) and pancreatic invasion (p=0.006) remained significant prognostic factors. Conclusion The T and N categories of the eighth edition AJCC staging system for DBDC accurately predict patient prognosis.
참고문헌 (25)
- Gonzalez RS, "Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma : analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas", Mod Pathol, 29, pp.1358~1369 (2016)
- Shin HR, "Comparison of incidence of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma : focus on East and South-Eastern Asia", Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 11, pp.1159~1166 (2010)
- Albores-Saavedra J, "WHO classification of tumours of digestive system", pp.266~273 (2010), IARC Press
- Siegel RL, "Cancer statistics, 2015", CA Cancer J Clin, 65, pp.5~29 (2015)
- Beahrs OH, "American Joint Committee in Cancer. Manual for staging of cancer" (1992), J.B. Lippincott Company
- Fleming ID, "AJCC cancer staging manual" (1997), Lippincott-Raven
- Hong SM, "Analysis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinomas according to the New American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system focused on tumor classification problems in 222 patients", Cancer, 104, pp.802~810 (2005)
- Hong SM, "Reconsideration of the histologic definitions used in the pathologic staging of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma", Am J Surg Pathol, 30, pp.744~749 (2006)
- Hong SM, "Depth of tumor invasion better predicts prognosis than the current American Joint Committee on Cancer T classification for distal bile duct carcinoma", Surgery, 146, pp.250~257 (2009)
- Edge SB, "AJCC cancer staging manual" (2010), Springer-Verlag
- Greene FL, "AJCC cancer staging manual" (2002), Springer-Verlag
- Hong SM, "Measurement of the invasion depth of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma: an alternative method overcoming the current T classification problems of the AJCC staging system", Am J Surg Pathol, 31, pp.199~206 (2007)
- Moon A, "Validation of T stage according to depth of invasion and N stage subclassification based on number of metastatic lymph nodes for distal extrahepatic bile duct (EBD) carcinoma", Medicine (Baltimore), 94, pp.e2064~ (2015)
- Edge SB, "AJCC cancer staging manual" (2017), Springer Nature
- Yoshida T, "Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the distal bile duct", Hepatogastroenterology, 45, pp.2388~2391 (1998)
- Yoshida T, "The pattern of lymphatic spread in carcinoma of the distal bile duct", Int Surg, 83, pp.124~127 (1998)
- Yoshida T, "Patterns of lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the distal bile duct", Hepatogastroenterology, 46, pp.1595~1598 (1999)
- Yoshida T, "Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for distal bile duct cancer", Arch Surg, 137, pp.69~73 (2002)
- Yoshida T, "Lymphatic spread differs according to tumor location in extrahepatic bile duct cancer", Hepatogastroenterology, 50, pp.17~20 (2003)
- Yoshida T, "Outcome of paraaortic node-positive pancreatic head and bile duct adenocarcinoma", Am J Surg, 187, pp.736~740 (2004)
- Schwarz RE, "Lymph node dissection impact on staging and survival of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, based on U.S. population data", J Gastrointest Surg, 11, pp.158~165 (2007)
- Hong SM, "The number of metastatic lymph nodes in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma as a prognostic factor", Am J Surg Pathol, 29, pp.1177~1183 (2005)
- Kiriyama M, "Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma", Br J Surg, 102, pp.399~406 (2015)
- Hamilton SR, "WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system", pp.134~146 (2010), IARC Press
- Kang JS, "Prognostic predictability of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system for distal bile duct cancer : limited usefulness compared with the 7th staging system", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 25, pp.124~130 (2018)