본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effect of Hospital Case Volume on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Analysis (KROG-1106)

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of hospital case volume on clinical outcomes in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and Methods Data on 1,073 patients with cT1-4N0-3M0 NPC were collected from a multi-institutional retrospective database (KROG 11-06). All patients received definitive radiotherapy (RT) either with three-dimensional-conformal RT (3D-CRT) (n=576) or intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) (n=497). The patients were divided into two groups treated at high volume institution (HVI) (n=750) and low volume institution (LVI) (n=323), defined as patient volume  10 (median, 13; range, 10 to 18) and < 10 patients per year (median, 3; range, 2 to 6), respectively. Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and loco-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS). Results At a median follow-up of 56.7 months, the outcomes were significantly better in those treated at HVI than at LVI. For the 614 patients of propensity score-matched cohort, 5-year OS and LRPFS were consistently higher in the HVI group than in the LVI group (OS: 78.4% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001; LRPFS: 86.2% vs. 65.8%, p < 0.001, respectively). According to RT modality, significant difference in 5-year OS was observed in patients receiving 3D-CRT (78.7% for HVI vs. 58.9% for LVI, p < 0.001) and not in those receiving IMRT (77.3% for HVI vs. 75.5% for LVI, p=0.170). Conclusion A significant relationship was observed between HVI and LVI for the clinical outcomes of patients with NPC. However, the difference in outcome becomes insignificant in the IMRT era, probably due to the standardization of practice by education.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of hospital case volume on clinical outcomes in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and Methods Data on 1,073 patients with cT1-4N0-3M0 NPC were collected from a multi-institutional retrospective database (KROG 11-06). All patients received definitive radiotherapy (RT) either with three-dimensional-conformal RT (3D-CRT) (n=576) or intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) (n=497). The patients were divided into two groups treated at high volume institution (HVI) (n=750) and low volume institution (LVI) (n=323), defined as patient volume  10 (median, 13; range, 10 to 18) and < 10 patients per year (median, 3; range, 2 to 6), respectively. Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and loco-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS). Results At a median follow-up of 56.7 months, the outcomes were significantly better in those treated at HVI than at LVI. For the 614 patients of propensity score-matched cohort, 5-year OS and LRPFS were consistently higher in the HVI group than in the LVI group (OS: 78.4% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001; LRPFS: 86.2% vs. 65.8%, p < 0.001, respectively). According to RT modality, significant difference in 5-year OS was observed in patients receiving 3D-CRT (78.7% for HVI vs. 58.9% for LVI, p < 0.001) and not in those receiving IMRT (77.3% for HVI vs. 75.5% for LVI, p=0.170). Conclusion A significant relationship was observed between HVI and LVI for the clinical outcomes of patients with NPC. However, the difference in outcome becomes insignificant in the IMRT era, probably due to the standardization of practice by education.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Birkmeyer JD, "Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States", N Engl J Med, 346, pp.1128~1137 (2002)
  2. Gruen RL, "The effect of provider case volume on cancer mortality : systematic review and meta-analysis", CA Cancer J Clin, 59, pp.192~211 (2009)
  3. Schrag D, "Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection", Ann Surg, 236, pp.583~592 (2002)
  4. Das IJ, "Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery : patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems", J Natl Cancer Inst, 100, pp.300~307 (2008)
  5. Hong TS, "Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice", Radiother Oncol, 103, pp.92~98 (2012)
  6. Nelms BE, "Variation in external beam treatment plan quality : an inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems", Pract Radiat Oncol, 2, pp.296~305 (2012)
  7. Moon SH, "IMRT vs. 2D-radiotherapy or 3D-conformal radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma : Survival outcome in a Korean multi-institutional retrospective study (KROG 11-06)", Strahlenther Onkol, 192, pp.377~385 (2016)
  8. 성수윤, "Patterns of care for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (KROG 11-06) in South Korea", Radiation oncology journal, 33(3), pp.188~197 (2015), 대한방사선종양학회
  9. Chen YW, "Association between treatment at a high-volume facility and improved survival for radiation-treated men with high-risk prostate cancer", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 94, pp.683~690 (2016)
  10. Koshy M, "Stereotactic body radiotherapy and treatment at a high volume facility is associated with improved survival in patients with inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer", Radiother Oncol, 114, pp.148~154 (2015)
  11. Wang EH, "Patients selected for definitive concurrent chemoradiation at high-volume facilities achieve improved survival in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer", J Thorac Oncol, 10, pp.937~943 (2015)
  12. Lee CC, "Survival rate in nasopharyngeal carcinoma improved by high caseload volume : a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan", Radiat Oncol, 6, pp.92~ (2011)
  13. Wuthrick EJ, "Institutional clinical trial accrual volume and survival of patients with head and neck cancer", J Clin Oncol, 33, pp.156~164 (2015)
  14. Boero IJ, "Importance of radiation oncologist experience among patients with head-and-neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy", J Clin Oncol, 34, pp.684~690 (2016)
  15. Lee N, "Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma : an update of the UCSF experience", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 53, pp.12~22 (2002)
  16. Al-Sarraf M, "Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer : phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099", J Clin Oncol, 16, pp.1310~1317 (1998)
  17. Langendijk JA, "The additional value of chemotherapy to radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of the published literature", J Clin Oncol, 22, pp.4604~4612 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

The Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study (KROG 11-06) Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis계철승, 금기창, 김범석, 김연실, 김원택, 김지윤, 노재명, 문성호, 박효정, 송진호, 안용찬, 오동률, 오영택, 우홍균, 이창걸, 정웅기, 조관호, 조문준, 차지혜, 하정훈대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2016 · 제48권 제3호Radiation Therapy Combined with (or without) Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy for Patients with Nasopharyngeal Cancer: 15-years Experience of a Single Institution in Korea강진형, 김민식, 김범수, 김연실, 김훈교, 문성권, 선동일, 유은정, 윤세철, 이연수, 정소령, 정수미, 조승호대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2008 · 제40권 제4호Tumor Volume Reduction Rate during Adaptive Radiation Therapy as a Prognosticator for Nasopharyngeal Cancer남희림, 노재명, 박수연, 안용찬, 오동률, 이혜빈대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2016 · 제48권 제2호Feasibility of Selective Neck Irradiation with Lower Elective Radiation Dose in Treating Nasopharynx Cancer Patients김태규, 남희림, 노재명, 안용찬, 오동렬, 이언주, 이혜빈, 조원경대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2019 · 제51권 제2호Patterns of Failure and Survival Trends in 3,808 Patients with Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosed from 1990 to 2012: A Large-Scale Retrospective Cohort StudyDi-Han Liu, Hai-Qiang Mai, Hao-Jun Xie, Jin-Jie Yan, Jun Ma, Lin-Quan Tang, Li-Ting Liu, Ming-Huang Hong, Qing-Nan Tang, Qiu-Yan Chen, Sai-Lan Liu, Shan-Shan Guo, Xiao-Yun Li, Xue-Song Sun, Yue-Feng Wen, Yu-Jing Liang대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2019 · 제51권 제4호Role of Chemotherapy in Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Curative Radiotherapy강민규, 강진형, 금기창, 김성환, 김연실, 김준원, 김지윤, 김진희, 문성호, 박근칠, 박준수, 박효정, 안용찬, 오동렬, 오영택, 우홍균, 이창걸, 조관호, 차지혜, 허대석대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2015 · 제47권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (39건)

S-1 Based Doublet as an Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Curatively Resected Stage III Gastric Cancer: Results from the Randomized Phase III POST Trial김봉석, 장대영, 라선영, 김기향, 강석윤, 이문희, 정현철, 정민규, 형우진, 이충근, 김효송, 정재호, 신동복, 정인경, 이경희, 노성훈pp. 1-11Incremental Role of Pancreatic Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Staging Computed Tomography to Evaluate Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma김명진, 최진영, 박미숙, 이진용, 한경화, 강창무, 정용은, 김혜진pp. 24-33The Characteristics and Survival Outcomes in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy EraSi-Yang Wang, Dong-Mei Mai, Yu-Yun Du, Dong-Hua Luo, Hao-Yuan Mo, Wang-Jian Zhang, Wayne R. Lawrence, Ya-Nan Jin, Xiu-Yu Cai, Mei-Su Lipp. 34-42Randomized Open Label Phase III Trial of Irinotecan Plus Capecitabine versus Capecitabine Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Anthracycline and Taxane: PROCEED Trial (KCSG BR 11-01)손주혁, 정경해, 박연희, 이경훈, 김태용, 박인혜, 이수이, 임석아, 노정실, 박경화, 김지현, 심성훈, 이근석, 안진희, 김성배, 남병호, 김희준pp. 43-52Medical Travel among Non-Seoul Residents to Seek Prostate Cancer Treatment in Medical Facilities of Seoul고준성, 김원재, 박종혁, 윤석중, 조인창, 김형준, 최훈, 정재일, 정현철, 이지열, 유호송, 김재헌, 김소영, 하윤석pp. 53-64