Prognostic Predictability of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Limited Improvement Compared with the 7th Staging System
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic values of the 7th and 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems for patients with resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). Materials and Methods A total of 348 patients who underwent major hepatectomy for PHCC between 2008 and 2015 were identified from a single center. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared across stage groups with the log-rank test. The concordance index was used to evaluate the prognostic predictability of the 8th AJCC staging system compared with that of the 7th. Results In the 8th edition, the stratification of each group of T classification improved compared to that in the 7th, as the survival rate of T4 decreased (T2, 31.2%; T3, 13.9%; T4, 15.1%; T1- T2, p=0.260; T2-T3, p=0.001; T3-T4, p=0.996). Both editions showed significant survival differences between each N category, except between N1 and N2 (p=0.063) in 7th edition. Differences of point estimates between the 8th and 7th T and N classification and overall stages were +0.028, +0.006, and +0.039, respectively (T, p=0.005; N, p=0.115; overall stage, p=0.005). In multivariable analysis, posthepatectomy liver failure, T category, N category, distant metastasis, histologic differentiation, intraoperative transfusion, and resection margin status were associated with OS. Conclusion The prognostic predictability of 8th AJCC staging for PHCC improved slightly, with statistical significance, compared to the 7th edition, but its overall performance is still unsatisfactory.
Abstract
Purpose This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic values of the 7th and 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems for patients with resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). Materials and Methods A total of 348 patients who underwent major hepatectomy for PHCC between 2008 and 2015 were identified from a single center. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared across stage groups with the log-rank test. The concordance index was used to evaluate the prognostic predictability of the 8th AJCC staging system compared with that of the 7th. Results In the 8th edition, the stratification of each group of T classification improved compared to that in the 7th, as the survival rate of T4 decreased (T2, 31.2%; T3, 13.9%; T4, 15.1%; T1- T2, p=0.260; T2-T3, p=0.001; T3-T4, p=0.996). Both editions showed significant survival differences between each N category, except between N1 and N2 (p=0.063) in 7th edition. Differences of point estimates between the 8th and 7th T and N classification and overall stages were +0.028, +0.006, and +0.039, respectively (T, p=0.005; N, p=0.115; overall stage, p=0.005). In multivariable analysis, posthepatectomy liver failure, T category, N category, distant metastasis, histologic differentiation, intraoperative transfusion, and resection margin status were associated with OS. Conclusion The prognostic predictability of 8th AJCC staging for PHCC improved slightly, with statistical significance, compared to the 7th edition, but its overall performance is still unsatisfactory.
참고문헌 (30)
- Ebata T, "The concept of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is valid", Br J Surg, 96, pp.926~934 (2009)
- Ebata T, "Proposal to modify the International Union Against Cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinomas", Br J Surg, 101, pp.79~88 (2014)
- Chun YS, "8th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual : pancreas and hepatobiliary cancers", Ann Surg Oncol, 25, pp.845~847 (2018)
- Steyerberg EW, "Assessing the performance of prediction models : a framework for traditional and novel measures", Epidemiology, 21, pp.128~138 (2010)
- Ebata T, "Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma : audit of 52 consecutive cases", Ann Surg, 238, pp.720~727 (2003)
- Ebata T, "Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for cholangiocarcinoma : a single-center review of 85 consecutive patients", Ann Surg, 256, pp.297~305 (2012)
- Esaki M, "Left hepatic trisectionectomy for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma", Br J Surg, 100, pp.801~807 (2013)
- Miyazaki M, "Combined vascular resection in operative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does it work or not?", Surgery, 141, pp.581~588 (2007)
- Nagino M, ""Anatomic" right hepatic trisectionectomy (extended right hepatectomy) with caudate lobectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma", Ann Surg, 243, pp.28~32 (2006)
- Nagino M, "Hepatectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma : an audit of 50 consecutive cases", Ann Surg, 252, pp.115~123 (2010)
- Seyama Y, "Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate", Ann Surg, 238, pp.73~83 (2003)
- de Jong MC, "The impact of portal vein resection on outcomes for hilar cholangiocarcinoma : a multi-institutional analysis of 305 cases", Cancer, 118, pp.4737~4747 (2012)
- Nuzzo G, "Improvement in perioperative and long-term outcome after surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma : results of an Italian multicenter analysis of 440 patients", Arch Surg, 147, pp.26~34 (2012)
- Regimbeau JM, "Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma : a multi-institutional update on practice and outcome by the AFC-HC study group", J Gastrointest Surg, 15, pp.480~488 (2011)
- Guglielmi A, "Patterns and prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for surgical treatment of perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma", J Gastrointest Surg, 17, pp.1917~1928 (2013)
- Sakata J, "Comparison of number versus ratio of positive lymph nodes in the assessment of lymph node status in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma", Ann Surg Oncol, 23, pp.225~234 (2016)
- Conci S, "What is the most accurate lymph node staging method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Comparison of UICC", AJCC pN stage, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes, 2017, pp.43, 743~750
- Bagante F, "Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma : number of nodes examined and optimal lymph node prognostic scheme", J Am Coll Surg, 222, pp.750~759 (2016)
- Giuliante F, "Association of lymph node status with survival in patients after liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma in an Italian multicenter analysis", JAMA Surg, 151, pp.916~922 (2016)
- Aoba T, "Assessment of nodal status for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma : location, number, or ratio of involved nodes", Ann Surg, 257, pp.718~725 (2013)
- Guglielmi A, "Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio after resection of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma", HPB(Oxford), 13, pp.240~245 (2011)
- Ito K, "Adequate lymph node assessment for extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma", Ann Surg, 251, pp.675~681 (2010)
- Ruys AT, "Metastatic lymph nodes in hilar cholangiocarcinoma : does size matter", HPB(Oxford), 13, pp.881~886 (2011)
- Hong SM, "Smooth muscle distribution in the extrahepatic bile duct : histologic and immunohistochemical studies of 122 cases", Am J Surg Pathol, 24, pp.660~667 (2000)
- 김정호, "Pathologic Factors Associated with Prognosis after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II", III Microsatellite-Unstable Colorectal Cancers, 2015, pp.49(2), 118~128[DOI]
- de Jong MC, "Hilar cholangiocarcinoma : tumor depth as a predictor of outcome", Arch Surg, 146, pp.697~703 (2011)
- Shinohara K, "Proposal for a new classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma based on tumour depth", Br J Surg, 106, pp.427~435 (2019)
- Ruzzenente A, "Comparison of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma", Surgery, 164, pp.244~250 (2018)
- Gaspersz MP, "Evaluation of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual 8th Edition for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma", J Gastrointest Surg (2019)[DOI]
- 유태석, "Proximal Resection Margins: More Prognostic than Distal Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Resection", Cancer Research and Treatment, 50(4), pp.1106~1113 (2018), 대한암학회