본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Olanzapine for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy: Results of the Korean South West Oncology Group (KSWOG) Study

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose Data on the efficacy of olanzapine in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of olanzapine versus placebo in controlling nausea and vomiting in patients receiving MEC. Materials and Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine whether olanzapine can reduce the frequency of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and improve the quality of life (QOL) in patients receiving palonosetron and dexamethasone as prophylaxis for MEC-induced nausea and vomiting. The primary end point was complete response for the acute phase (0-24 hours after chemotherapy). The secondary end points were complete response for the delayed (24-120 hours) and overall phase (0-120 hours), proportion of significant nausea (visual analogue scale  25 mm), use of rescue medications, and effect on QOL. Results Fifty-six patients were randomized to the olanzapine (n=29) and placebo (n=27) groups. Complete response rates were not significantly different between the olanzapine and placebo groups in the acute (96.5% vs. 88.0%, p=0.326), delayed (69.0% vs. 48.0%, p=0.118), and overall phases (69.0% vs. 48.0%, p=0.118). However, the percentage of patients with significant nausea (17.2% vs. 44.0%, p=0.032) and the use of rescue medications (0.03±0.19 vs. 1.88±2.88, p=0.002) were lower in the olanzapine group than in the placebo. Furthermore, the olanzapine group demonstrated better QOL (p=0.015). Conclusion Olanzapine combined with palonosetron and dexamethasone significantly improved QOL and vomiting control among previously untreated patients receiving MEC, although the efficacy was limited to the reduction of the frequency of CINV.

Abstract

Purpose Data on the efficacy of olanzapine in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of olanzapine versus placebo in controlling nausea and vomiting in patients receiving MEC. Materials and Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine whether olanzapine can reduce the frequency of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and improve the quality of life (QOL) in patients receiving palonosetron and dexamethasone as prophylaxis for MEC-induced nausea and vomiting. The primary end point was complete response for the acute phase (0-24 hours after chemotherapy). The secondary end points were complete response for the delayed (24-120 hours) and overall phase (0-120 hours), proportion of significant nausea (visual analogue scale  25 mm), use of rescue medications, and effect on QOL. Results Fifty-six patients were randomized to the olanzapine (n=29) and placebo (n=27) groups. Complete response rates were not significantly different between the olanzapine and placebo groups in the acute (96.5% vs. 88.0%, p=0.326), delayed (69.0% vs. 48.0%, p=0.118), and overall phases (69.0% vs. 48.0%, p=0.118). However, the percentage of patients with significant nausea (17.2% vs. 44.0%, p=0.032) and the use of rescue medications (0.03±0.19 vs. 1.88±2.88, p=0.002) were lower in the olanzapine group than in the placebo. Furthermore, the olanzapine group demonstrated better QOL (p=0.015). Conclusion Olanzapine combined with palonosetron and dexamethasone significantly improved QOL and vomiting control among previously untreated patients receiving MEC, although the efficacy was limited to the reduction of the frequency of CINV.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Ingle RJ, "Conditionability of cancer chemotherapy patients", Oncol Nurs Forum, 11, pp.97~102 (1984)
  2. Richardson JL, "The influence of symptoms of disease and side effects of treatment on compliance with cancer therapy", J Clin Oncol, 6, pp.1746~1752 (1988)
  3. Herrstedt J, "Antiemetics : an update and the MASCC guidelines applied in clinical practice", Nat Clin Pract Oncol, 5, pp.32~43 (2008)
  4. Hesketh PJ, "Combined data from two phase III trials of the NK1 antagonist aprepitant plus a 5HT 3 antagonist and a corticosteroid for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting : effect of gender on treatment response", Support Care Cancer, 14, pp.354~360 (2006)
  5. Hesketh PJ, "Antiemetics : American Society of Clinical Oncology focused guideline update", J Clin Oncol, 34, pp.381~386 (2016)
  6. Herrstedt J, "2016 Updated MASCC", ESMO consensus recommendations : prevention of nausea and vomiting following high emetic risk chemotherapy, 2017, pp.25, 277~288
  7. Jordan K, "International antiemetic guidelines on chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting(CINV) : content and implementation in daily routine practice", Eur J Pharmacol, 722, pp.197~202 (2014)
  8. Geling O, "Should 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists be administered beyond 24 hours after chemotherapy to prevent delayed emesis? Systematic re-evaluation of clinical evidence and drug cost implications", J Clin Oncol, 23, pp.1289~1294 (2005)
  9. Bymaster FP, "Potent antagonism of 5-HT(3)and 5-HT(6)receptors by olanzapine", Eur J Pharmacol, 430, pp.341~349 (2001)
  10. Navari RM, "Olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting", N Engl J Med, 375, pp.134~142 (2016)
  11. Navari RM, "Olanzapine versus aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting : a randomized phase III trial", J Support Oncol, 9, pp.188~195 (2011)
  12. Mizukami N, "Olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy : a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study", J Pain Symptom Manage, 47, pp.542~550 (2014)
  13. Borjeson S, "Similarities and differences in assessing nausea on a verbal category scale and a visual analogue scale", Cancer Nurs, 20, pp.260~266 (1997)
  14. Martin AR, "Assessing the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients' daily lives : a modified version of the Functional Living Index-Emesis(FLIE)with 5-day recall", Support Care Cancer, 11, pp.522~527 (2003)
  15. Hesketh PJ, "Antiemetics : American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update", J Clin Oncol, 35, pp.3240~3261 (2017)
  16. Berger MJ, "NCCN guidelines insights: antiemesis, version 2.2017", J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 15, pp.883~893 (2017)
  17. Chiu L, "Efficacy of olanzapine for the prophylaxis and rescue of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting(CINV) : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Support Care Cancer, 24, pp.2381~2392 (2016)
  18. Navari RM, "A phase II trial of olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting : a Hoosier Oncology Group study", Support Care Cancer, 13, pp.529~534 (2005)
  19. Tan L, "Clinical research of olanzapine for prevention of chemotherapyinduced nausea and vomiting", J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 28, pp.131~ (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

A Randomized Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter Trial of Azasetron versus Ondansetron to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety in the Prevention of Delayed Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Chemotherapy김동완, 김봉석, 김상위, 김시영, 김열홍, 김종광, 김준희, 김훈교, 박희숙, 송홍석, 양성현, 이경희, 이희연대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2014 · 제46권 제1호Clinical Practices and Outcomes on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Management in South Korea: Comparison with Asia-Pacific Data of the Pan Australasian Chemotherapy Induced Emesis Burden of Illness Study정훈, 김종광, 안중배, 오성용, 이명아, 이지윤, 조은경, Thomas Burke대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2016 · 제48권 제4호A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Ramosetron, Aprepitant, and Dexamethasone in Preventing Cisplatin-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Chemotherapy-Naïve Cancer Patients권정혜, 김정한, 김형수, 김호영, 김효정, 박건욱, 송헌호, 장근두, 장대영, 정주영, 최대로, 한보람대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2013 · 제45권 제3호Ramosetron versus Palonosetron in Combination with Aprepitant and Dexamethasone for the Control of Highly-Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting강진형, 구동회, 권정혜, 김건민, 김진영, 김화정, 박건욱, 설영미, 손주혁, 송헌호, 안진석, 안호정, 양지현, 윤환중, 이윤규, 이현우대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2020 · 제52권 제3호Carboplatin을 포함한 항암제 투여환자에서 유발된 오심, 구토에 대한 palonosetron과 ramosetron의 항구토효과 비교고영주, 나현오, 이연지, 황은정한국병원약사회 · 병원약사회지2010 · 제27권 제4호Open-label, Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Intravenous Dolasetron Mesylate and Ondansetron in the Prevention of Acute and Delayed Cisplatin-induced Emesis in Cancer Patients김노경, 김동완, 김진수, 김태유, 박숙련, 방영주, 임석아, 최인실, 허대석, Ji Yeon Baek, Sang-Il Kim대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2004 · 제36권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (39건)

S-1 Based Doublet as an Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Curatively Resected Stage III Gastric Cancer: Results from the Randomized Phase III POST Trial김봉석, 장대영, 라선영, 김기향, 강석윤, 이문희, 정현철, 정민규, 형우진, 이충근, 김효송, 정재호, 신동복, 정인경, 이경희, 노성훈pp. 1-11The Effect of Hospital Case Volume on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Analysis (KROG-1106)김진호, 노재명, 이종훈, 김성환, 최진화, 김연실, 김원택, 오영택, 강민규, 김진희, 조관호, 이창걸, 김지윤, 문성호, 조문준, 안용찬, 금기창, 우홍균, 오동률, 하보람, 계철승pp. 12-23Incremental Role of Pancreatic Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Staging Computed Tomography to Evaluate Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma김명진, 최진영, 박미숙, 이진용, 한경화, 강창무, 정용은, 김혜진pp. 24-33The Characteristics and Survival Outcomes in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy EraSi-Yang Wang, Dong-Mei Mai, Yu-Yun Du, Dong-Hua Luo, Hao-Yuan Mo, Wang-Jian Zhang, Wayne R. Lawrence, Ya-Nan Jin, Xiu-Yu Cai, Mei-Su Lipp. 34-42Randomized Open Label Phase III Trial of Irinotecan Plus Capecitabine versus Capecitabine Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Anthracycline and Taxane: PROCEED Trial (KCSG BR 11-01)손주혁, 정경해, 박연희, 이경훈, 김태용, 박인혜, 이수이, 임석아, 노정실, 박경화, 김지현, 심성훈, 이근석, 안진희, 김성배, 남병호, 김희준pp. 43-52