본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Open-label, Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Intravenous Dolasetron Mesylate and Ondansetron in the Prevention of Acute and Delayed Cisplatin-induced Emesis in Cancer Patients

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of intravenous dolasetron mesylate and ondansetron in the prevention of acute and delayed emesis. Material and Methods: From April 2002 through October 2002, a total of 112 patients receiving cisplatin- based combination chemotherapy were randomized to receive a single i.v. dose of dolasetron 100 mg or ondansetron 8 mg, 30 minutes before the initiation of chemotherapy. In the ondansetron group, two additional doses of ondansetron 8 mg were given at intervals of 2 to 4 hours. To prevent delayed emesis, dolasetron 200 mg p.o. daily or ondansetron 8 mg p.o. bid was administered from the 2nd days to a maximum of 5 days. The primary end point was the proportion of patients that experienced no emetic episodes and required no rescue medication (complete response, CR) during the 24 hours (acute period) and during Day 2 to Day 5 2 days (delayed period), after chemotherapy. The secondary end points included the incidence and severity of emesis. Results: 105 patients were evaluable for efficacy. CR rates during the acute period were 36.0% for a single dose of dolasetron 100 mg, and 43.6% for three doses of ondansetron 8 mg. CR rates during the delayed period were 8.0% and 10.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the efficacy between the two groups. Adverse effects were mostly mild to moderate and not related to study medication. Conclusions: A single i.v. dose of dolasetron 100 mg is as effective as three i.v. doses of ondansetron 8 mg in preventing acute and delayed emesis after cisplatin- based chemotherapy, with a comparable safety profile.(Cancer Res Treat. 2004;36:372-376)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of intravenous dolasetron mesylate and ondansetron in the prevention of acute and delayed emesis. Material and Methods: From April 2002 through October 2002, a total of 112 patients receiving cisplatin- based combination chemotherapy were randomized to receive a single i.v. dose of dolasetron 100 mg or ondansetron 8 mg, 30 minutes before the initiation of chemotherapy. In the ondansetron group, two additional doses of ondansetron 8 mg were given at intervals of 2 to 4 hours. To prevent delayed emesis, dolasetron 200 mg p.o. daily or ondansetron 8 mg p.o. bid was administered from the 2nd days to a maximum of 5 days. The primary end point was the proportion of patients that experienced no emetic episodes and required no rescue medication (complete response, CR) during the 24 hours (acute period) and during Day 2 to Day 5 2 days (delayed period), after chemotherapy. The secondary end points included the incidence and severity of emesis. Results: 105 patients were evaluable for efficacy. CR rates during the acute period were 36.0% for a single dose of dolasetron 100 mg, and 43.6% for three doses of ondansetron 8 mg. CR rates during the delayed period were 8.0% and 10.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the efficacy between the two groups. Adverse effects were mostly mild to moderate and not related to study medication. Conclusions: A single i.v. dose of dolasetron 100 mg is as effective as three i.v. doses of ondansetron 8 mg in preventing acute and delayed emesis after cisplatin- based chemotherapy, with a comparable safety profile.(Cancer Res Treat. 2004;36:372-376)

참고문헌 (21)

  1. "Comparative review of 5-HT3 receptor antagonistsin the treatment of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea andvomiting", 18, pp.163~173 (2000)
  2. "On the receiving end--patient perception of theside-effects of cancer chemotherapy", 19, pp.203~8 (1983)
  3. "The impact of cytotoxic chemotherapy--perspectives from patients", pp.1~8 (1992)
  4. "Closing the gap in prophylactic antiemetictherapy patient factors in calculating the emetogenic potentialof chemotherapy", 3, pp.113~119 (1999)
  5. "A double-blind randomized study comparing intramuscular(i.m.) granisetron with i.m. granisetron plus dexamethasone inthe prevention of delayed emesis induced by cisplatin", 10, pp.465~470 (1999), TheItalian Multicenter Study Group
  6. "Efficacy of intravenous granisetron to control nauseaand vomiting during multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy", 16, pp.87~93 (1998)
  7. "Potent 5-HT3 antagonists incorporating anovel bridged pseudopelletierine ring system", 16, pp.187~9 (1989)
  8. "Disposition following single- doseintravenous administration to normal male subjects", pp.693~701 (1992)
  9. "Characterization of the novel 5-HT3 antagonists MDL73147EF and MDL 74156 in NG108-15neuroblastoma x glioma cells", pp.9~13 (1992)
  10. "a potent and selective antagonist at 5-HT3 receptors", pp.87~93 (1993)
  11. "Pharmacokineticsof dolasetron following single- and multiple- doseintravenous administration to normal male subjects", 16, pp.177~189 (1995)
  12. "Dolasetron mesylate", 18, pp.506~9 (1993)
  13. "in cancer patientstreated with cisplatin", pp.97~102 (1994)
  14. "Dose-ranging evaluation of the serotonin antagonistdolasetron mesylate in patients receiving high-dosecisplatin", 12, pp.1045~9 (1994)
  15. "parallel study of two doses of intravenous MDL73", modia(m) (1992)
  16. "Dose-ranging evaluation of the antiemeticefficacy of intravenous dolasetron in patients receiving chemotherapywith doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide", 4, pp.141~146 (1996)
  17. "Double-blind, randomized comparison of the antiemeticefficacy of intravenous dolasetron mesylate and intravenousondansetron in the prevention of acute cisplatin-inducedemesis in patients with cancer", 14, pp.2242~2249 (1996), Dolasetron Comparative Chemotherapy-induced Emesis Prevention Group
  18. "A randomized comparison of antiemetic effect of ondansetronversus MDL", pp.378~389 (1992)
  19. "and metoclopramideplus dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin", pp.108~14 (1989), Cirrincione C
  20. "Urinary serotonin metabolite excretion during cisplatin chemotherapy", 72, pp.2239~41 (1993)
  21. "5-HT3 receptor antagonists for theprevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting", 55, pp.173~189 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

A Randomized Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter Trial of Azasetron versus Ondansetron to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety in the Prevention of Delayed Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Chemotherapy김동완, 김봉석, 김상위, 김시영, 김열홍, 김종광, 김준희, 김훈교, 박희숙, 송홍석, 양성현, 이경희, 이희연대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2014 · 제46권 제1호A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Ramosetron, Aprepitant, and Dexamethasone in Preventing Cisplatin-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Chemotherapy-Naïve Cancer Patients권정혜, 김정한, 김형수, 김호영, 김효정, 박건욱, 송헌호, 장근두, 장대영, 정주영, 최대로, 한보람대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2013 · 제45권 제3호Ramosetron versus Palonosetron in Combination with Aprepitant and Dexamethasone for the Control of Highly-Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting강진형, 구동회, 권정혜, 김건민, 김진영, 김화정, 박건욱, 설영미, 손주혁, 송헌호, 안진석, 안호정, 양지현, 윤환중, 이윤규, 이현우대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2020 · 제52권 제3호Efficacy of the granisetron transdermal system for the control of nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial강진형, 우인숙, Der Sheng Sun, Hoon Kyo Kim, Jong Youl Jin, Suk Young Park, Yoon Ho Ko, Yun Ae Eom대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2023 · 제38권 제3호A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Olanzapine for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy: Results of the Korean South West Oncology Group (KSWOG) Study심혁, 고세일, 박무림, 배우균, 송은기, 윤환중, 이상철, 임용진, 전소연, 한혜숙대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2019 · 제51권 제1호Carboplatin을 포함한 항암제 투여환자에서 유발된 오심, 구토에 대한 palonosetron과 ramosetron의 항구토효과 비교고영주, 나현오, 이연지, 황은정한국병원약사회 · 병원약사회지2010 · 제27권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)