Coronal microleakage of four temporary restorative materials in Class II-type endodontic access preparations
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of 4 temporary materials in teeth with Class II–type endodontic access preparations by using a glucose penetration model. Materials and Methods: Glucose reaction test was performed to rule out the presence of any reaction between glucose and temporary material. Class II-type endodontic access preparations were made in extracted human premolars with a single root (n = 10). Each experimental group was restored with Caviton (GC), Spacer (Vericom), IRM (Dentsply-Caulk), or Fuji II(GC). Microleakage of four materials used as temporary restorative materials was evaluated by using a glucose penetration model. Data were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance followed by a multiplecomparison Tukey test. The interface between materials and tooth were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: There was no significant reaction between glucose and temporary materials used in this study. Microleakage was significantly lower for Caviton and Spacer than for Fuji II and IRM. SEM observation showed more intimate adaptation of tooth-restoration interfaces in Caviton and Spacer than in IRM and Fuji II. Conclusions: Compared to IRM and Fuji II, Caviton and Spacer can be considered better temporary sealing materials in Class II-type endodontic access cavities.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of 4 temporary materials in teeth with Class II–type endodontic access preparations by using a glucose penetration model. Materials and Methods: Glucose reaction test was performed to rule out the presence of any reaction between glucose and temporary material. Class II-type endodontic access preparations were made in extracted human premolars with a single root (n = 10). Each experimental group was restored with Caviton (GC), Spacer (Vericom), IRM (Dentsply-Caulk), or Fuji II(GC). Microleakage of four materials used as temporary restorative materials was evaluated by using a glucose penetration model. Data were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance followed by a multiplecomparison Tukey test. The interface between materials and tooth were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: There was no significant reaction between glucose and temporary materials used in this study. Microleakage was significantly lower for Caviton and Spacer than for Fuji II and IRM. SEM observation showed more intimate adaptation of tooth-restoration interfaces in Caviton and Spacer than in IRM and Fuji II. Conclusions: Compared to IRM and Fuji II, Caviton and Spacer can be considered better temporary sealing materials in Class II-type endodontic access cavities.
참고문헌 (21)
- Noguera AP, "Comparative in vitro coronal microleakage study of new endodontic restorative materials", J Endod, 16, pp.523~527 (1990)
- Ciftçi A, "Coronal microleakage of four endodontic temporary restorative materials: an in vitro study", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 108, pp.67~70 (2009)
- Deveaux E, "Bacterial microleakage of Cavit, IRM, TERM, and Fermit: a 21-day in vitro study", J Endod, 25, pp.653~659 (1999)
- 정동호, "동적하중 하에서 근관치료용 임시충전재의 미세누출의 평가", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 33(3), pp.198~203 (2008), 대한치과보존학회
- Lee YC, "Chung KH. Microleakage of endodontic temporary restoration materials", J Endod, 19, pp.516~520 (1993)
- Madarati A, "Timedependence of coronal seal of temporary materials used in endodontics", Aust Endod J, 34, pp.89~93 (2008)
- Anderson RW, "Microleakage of temporary restorations in complex endodontic access preparations", J Endod, 15, pp.526~529 (1989)
- Shemesh H, "Glucose reactivity with filling materials as a limitation for using the glucose leakage model", Int Endod J, 41, pp.869~872 (2008)
- Xu Q, "A new quantitative method using glucose for analysis of endodontic leakage", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 99, pp.107~111 (2005)
- Lai YY, "Marginal leakage of different temporary restorations in standardized complex endodontic access preparations", J Endod, 33, pp.875~878 (2007)
- Cruz EV, "A laboratory study of coronal microleakage using four temporary restorative materials", Int Endod J, 35, pp.315~320 (2002)
- Uçtaşli MB, "Microleakage of different types of temporary restorative materials used in endodontics", J Oral Sci, 42, pp.63~67 (2000)
- Teplitsky PE, "Sealing ability of Cavit and TERM as intermediate restorative materials", J Endod, 14, pp.278~282 (1988)
- 조낙연, "레진계 임시수복재의 중합수축,수화팽창과 미세누출", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 33(2), pp.115~124 (2008), 대한치과보존학회
- Deveaux E, "Bacterial microleakage of Cavit, IRM, and Term", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 74, pp.634~643 (1992)
- Uranga A, "A comparative study of four coronal obturation materials in endodontic treatment", J Endod, 25, pp.178~180 (1999)
- Zaia AA, "An in vitro evaluation of four materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth", Int Endod J, 35, pp.729~734 (2002)
- Burrow MF, "A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentine bonding systems to primary and permanent dentine", Dent Mater, 18, pp.239~245 (2002)
- Xie H, "Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement", Aust Dent J, 53, pp.325~331 (2008)
- Naoum HJ, "Temporization for endodontics", Int Endod J, 35, pp.964~978 (2002)
- Friedman S, "Retrograde approaches in endodontic therapy", Endod Dent Traumatol, 7, pp.97~107 (1991)