Evaluation of internal adaptation of dental adhesive restorations using micro-CT
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The internal adaptation of composite restorations with or without resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) was analyzed non-destructively using Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Materials and Methods: Thirty intact human teeth were used. The specimens were divided into 3 groups. In the control group, the cavities were etched with 10% phosphoric acid for 15 sec. Composite resin was filled into the cavity without adhesive. In group 1, light cured glass ionomer cement (GIC, Fuji II LC, GC) was applied as a base. The cavities were then etched, bonded, light cured and filled with composites. In group 2, the cavities were then etched, bonded, light cured and filled with composites without base application. They were immersed in a 25% silver nitrate solution. Micro-CT was performed before and after mechanical loading. One-way ANOVA with Duncan analysis was used to compare the internal adaptation between the groups before or after loading. A paired t-test was used to compare internal adaptation before and after mechanical loading. All statistical inferences were made within the 95% confidence interval. Results: The silver nitrate solution successfully penetrated into the dentinal tubules from the pulp spaces, and infiltrated into the gap between restoration and pulpal floor. Group 2 showed a lower adaptation than the control group and group 1 (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the control group and group 1. For all groups, there was a significant difference between before and after mechanical loading (p <0.05). Conclusions: The internal adaptation before and after loading was better when composites were bonded to tooth using adhesive than composites based with RMGIC.
Abstract
Objectives: The internal adaptation of composite restorations with or without resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) was analyzed non-destructively using Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Materials and Methods: Thirty intact human teeth were used. The specimens were divided into 3 groups. In the control group, the cavities were etched with 10% phosphoric acid for 15 sec. Composite resin was filled into the cavity without adhesive. In group 1, light cured glass ionomer cement (GIC, Fuji II LC, GC) was applied as a base. The cavities were then etched, bonded, light cured and filled with composites. In group 2, the cavities were then etched, bonded, light cured and filled with composites without base application. They were immersed in a 25% silver nitrate solution. Micro-CT was performed before and after mechanical loading. One-way ANOVA with Duncan analysis was used to compare the internal adaptation between the groups before or after loading. A paired t-test was used to compare internal adaptation before and after mechanical loading. All statistical inferences were made within the 95% confidence interval. Results: The silver nitrate solution successfully penetrated into the dentinal tubules from the pulp spaces, and infiltrated into the gap between restoration and pulpal floor. Group 2 showed a lower adaptation than the control group and group 1 (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the control group and group 1. For all groups, there was a significant difference between before and after mechanical loading (p <0.05). Conclusions: The internal adaptation before and after loading was better when composites were bonded to tooth using adhesive than composites based with RMGIC.
참고문헌 (44)
- Retief DH, "Do adhesives prevent microleakage?", Int Dent J, 44, pp.19~26 (1994)
- Friedl KH, "Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer", composite sandwich restorations, 1997, pp.22, 21~29
- Tolidis K, "Effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner on volumetric polymerization shrinkage of various composites", Dent Mater, 14, pp.417~423 (1998)
- Krejci I, "The influence of different base materials on marginal adaptation and wear of conventional Class II composite resin restorations", Quintessence Int, 19, pp.191~198 (1988)
- Unemori M, "Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program", J Dent, 29, pp.7~13 (2001)
- van Dijken JW, "A 6-year clinical evaluation of Class I poly-acid modified resin composite", resin composite laminate restorations cured with a two-step curing technique, 2003, pp.19, 423~428
- Opdam NJ, "Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total etch posterior composite resin restorations", J Adhes Dent, 9, pp.469~475 (2007)
- "The Influence of Elastic Modulus of Base Material on the Marginal Adaptation of Direct Composite Restoration", Operative Dentistry, 35(4), pp.441~447 (2010)
- Hayashi M, "Marginal deterioration as a predictor of failure of a posterior composite", Eur J Oral Sci, 111, pp.155~162 (2003)
- Souza-Junior EJ, "Effect of the curing method and composite volume on marginal and internal adaptation of composite restoratives", Oper Dent, 36, pp.231~238 (2011)
- Carvalho RM, "A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief", Oper Dent, 21, pp.17~24 (1996)
- Tay FR, "Water treeing-a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives", Am J Dent, 16, pp.6~12 (2003)
- Ratih DN, "Messer HH. Minimizing dentinal fluid flow associated with gap formation", J Dent Res, 85, pp.1027~1031 (2006)
- Banomyong D, "Sealing ability of occlusal resin composite restoration using four restorative procedures", Eur J Oral Sci, 116, pp.571~578 (2008)
- Ciucchi B, "Volume of the internal gap formed under composite restorations in vitro", J Dent, 25, pp.305~312 (1997)
- Peliz MI, "Scanning electron microscope analysis of internal adaptation of materials used for pulp protection under composite resin restorations", J Esthet Restor Dent, 17, pp.118~128 (2005)
- Ishibashi K, "Swept-source optical coherence tomography as a new tool to evaluate defects of resin-based composite restorations", J Dent, 39, pp.543~548 (2011)
- Sun J, "Eidelman N, Lin-Gibson S. 3D mapping of polymerization shrinkage using X-ray micro-computed tomography to predict microleakage", Dent Mater, 25, pp.314~320 (2009)
- Zeiger DN, "Evaluation of dental composite shrinkage and leakage in extracted teeth using X-ray microcomputed tomography", Dent Mater, 25, pp.1213~1220 (2009)
- Kakaboura A, "3D-marginal adaptation versus setting shrinkage inlight-cured microhybrid resin composites", Dent Mater, 23, pp.272~278 (2007)
- Eden E, "Micro- CT for measuring marginal leakage of Class II resin composite restorations in primary molars prepared in vivo", Am J Dent, 21, pp.393~397 (2008)
- Peters OA, "Threedimensional analysis of root canal geometry by highresolution computed tomography", J Dent Res, 79, pp.1405~1409 (2000)
- Hotta M, "Adaptation to the cavity floor of the light-cured glass ionomer cement base under a composite restoration", J Oral Rehabil, 21, pp.679~685 (1994)
- Oliveira LC, "Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations", Dent Mater, 26, pp.e159~e169 (2010)
- Nomoto R, "Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement", Dent Mater, 20, pp.972~978 (2004)
- Retief DH, "Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage of the dentin", restoration interface, 1994, pp.7, 44~46
- Erickson RL, "Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems", J Esthet Dent, 6, pp.227~244 (1994)
- Nery S, "A comparative study of three dental adhesives", J Dent, 23, pp.55~61 (1995)
- Tjan AH, "Bond strength of multistep and simplified-step systems", Am J Dent, 9, pp.269~272 (1996)
- Triolo PT Jr, "Shear bond strengths of composite to dentin using six dental adhesive systems", Oper Dent, 20, pp.46~50 (1995)
- van der Vyver PJ, "Shear bond strength of four dentine bonding systems to dry and moist dentine", J Dent Assoc S Afr, 52, pp.555~558 (1997)
- Eliades G, "In vitro characterization of visible light-cured glass ionomer liners", Dent Mater, 9, pp.198~203 (1993)
- Cattani-Lorente MA, "Comparative study of the physical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement", Dent Mater, 15, pp.21~32 (1999)
- Tam LE, "Physical properties of proprietary light-cured lining materials", Oper Dent, 16, pp.210~217 (1991)
- Tam LE, "Physical properties of calcium hydroxide and glass-ionomer base and lining materials", Dent Mater, 5, pp.145~149 (1989)
- Young AM, "FTIR investigation of polymerisation and polyacid neutralisation kinetics in resin-modified glassionomer dental cements", Biomaterials, 23, pp.3289~3295 (2002)
- Feilzer AJ, "The influence of water sorption on the development of setting shrinkage stress in traditional and resinmodified glass ionomer cements", Dent Mater, 11, pp.186~190 (1995)
- Mason PN, "In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin", Quintessence Int, 25, pp.499~504 (1994)
- Akpata ES, "Post-operative sensitivity in glass-ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composites", Am J Dent, 14, pp.34~38 (2001)
- Burrow MF, "Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite-a randomized clinical trial", Oper Dent, 34, pp.648~655 (2009)
- Unemori M, "Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program", J Dent, 29, pp.7~13 (2001)
- Heintze SD, "Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome", J Adhes Dent, 9, pp.77~106 (2007)
- Heintze S, "Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers-comparison with SEM quantitative analysis", J Adhes Dent, 10, pp.259~267 (2008)
- Chen X, "Optimal use of silver nitrate and marginal leakage at the sealantenamel interface using micro-CT", Am J Dent, 22, pp.269~272 (2009)