Bone regeneration effects of human allogenous bone substitutes: a preliminary study
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the bone regeneration effects of cortical, cancellous, and cortico-cancellous human bone substitutes on calvarial defects of rabbits. Methods: Four 8-mm diameter calvarial defects were created in each of nine New Zealand white rabbits. Freeze-dried cortical bone, freeze-dried cortico-cancellous bone, and demineralized bone matrix with freeze-dried cancellous bone were inserted into the defects, while the non-grafted defect was regarded as the control. After 4, 8, and 12 weeks of healing, the experimental animals were euthanized for specimen preparation. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) was performed to calculate the percent bone volume. After histological evaluation, histomorphometric analysis was performed to quantify new bone formation. Results: In micro-CT evaluation, freeze-dried cortico-cancellous human bone showed the highest percent bone volume value among the experimental groups at week 4. At week 8 and week 12, freeze-dried cortical human bone showed the highest percent bone volume value among the experimental groups. In histologic evaluation, at week 4, freeze-dried cortico-cancellous human bone showed more prominent osteoid tissue than any other group. New bone formation was increased in all of the experimental groups at week 8 and 12. Histomorphometric data showed that freeze-dried cortico-cancellous human bone showed a significantly higher new bone formation percentile value than any other experimental group at week 4. At week 8,freeze-dried cortical human bone showed the highest value, of which a significant difference existed between freeze-dried cortical human bone and demineralized bone matrix with freeze-dried cancellous human bone. At week 12, there were no significant differences among the experimental groups. Conclusions: Freeze-dried cortico-cancellous human bone showed swift new bone formation at the 4-week healing phase,whereas there was less difference in new bone formation among the experimental groups in the following healing phases.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the bone regeneration effects of cortical, cancellous, and cortico-cancellous human bone substitutes on calvarial defects of rabbits. Methods: Four 8-mm diameter calvarial defects were created in each of nine New Zealand white rabbits. Freeze-dried cortical bone, freeze-dried cortico-cancellous bone, and demineralized bone matrix with freeze-dried cancellous bone were inserted into the defects, while the non-grafted defect was regarded as the control. After 4, 8, and 12 weeks of healing, the experimental animals were euthanized for specimen preparation. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) was performed to calculate the percent bone volume. After histological evaluation, histomorphometric analysis was performed to quantify new bone formation. Results: In micro-CT evaluation, freeze-dried cortico-cancellous human bone showed the highest percent bone volume value among the experimental groups at week 4. At week 8 and week 12, freeze-dried cortical human bone showed the highest percent bone volume value among the experimental groups. In histologic evaluation, at week 4, freeze-dried cortico-cancellous human bone showed more prominent osteoid tissue than any other group. New bone formation was increased in all of the experimental groups at week 8 and 12. Histomorphometric data showed that freeze-dried cortico-cancellous human bone showed a significantly higher new bone formation percentile value than any other experimental group at week 4. At week 8,freeze-dried cortical human bone showed the highest value, of which a significant difference existed between freeze-dried cortical human bone and demineralized bone matrix with freeze-dried cancellous human bone. At week 12, there were no significant differences among the experimental groups. Conclusions: Freeze-dried cortico-cancellous human bone showed swift new bone formation at the 4-week healing phase,whereas there was less difference in new bone formation among the experimental groups in the following healing phases.
참고문헌 (16)
- Helm GA, "Bone graft substitutes for the promotion of spinal arthrodesis", Neurosurg Focus, 10, pp.E4~ (2001)
- Giannoudis PV, "Bone substitutes: an update", Injury, 36(Suppl 3), pp.S20~27 (2005)
- Urist MR, "Bone: formation by autoinduction", Science, 150, pp.893~899 (1965)
- Misch CE, "Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry", Implant Dent, 2, pp.158~167 (1993)
- Pietrzak WS, "Assay of bone morphogenetic protein-2, -4, and -7 in human demineralized bone matrix", J Craniofac Surg, 17, pp.84~90 (2006)
- Mellonig JT, "Comparison of bone graft materials. Part I. New bone formation with autografts and allografts determined by Strontium-85", J Periodontol, 52, pp.291~296 (1981)
- Mellonig JT, "Comparison of bone graft materials. Part II. New bone formation with autografts and allografts: a histological evaluation", J Periodontol, 52, pp.297~302 (1981)
- Piattelli A, "Comparison of bone regeneration with the use of mineralized and demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts: a histological and histochemical study in man", Biomaterials, 17, pp.1127~1131 (1996)
- Rummelhart JM, "A comparison of freeze-dried bone allograft and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in human periodontal osseous defects", J Periodontol, 60, pp.655~663 (1989)
- Mellonig JT, "Clinical evaluation of freeze-dried bone allografts in periodontal osseous defects", J Periodontol, 47, pp.125~131 (1976)
- Cammack GV 2nd, "Histologic evaluation of mineralized and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft for ridge and sinus augmentations", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 25, pp.231~237 (2005)
- Cornell CN, "Osteobiologics", Bull Hosp Jt Dis, 62, pp.13~17 (2004)
- Behairy Y, "Bone grafts and bone substitutes in hip and knee surgery", Orthop Clin North Am, 30, pp.661~671 (1999)
- Goldberg VM, "Natural history of autografts and allografts", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 7, pp.16~ (1987)
- Ludwig SC, "Osteoinductive bone graft substitutes for spinal fusion: a basic science summary", Orthop Clin North Am, 30, pp.635~645 (1999)
- Schreurs BW, "Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morsellised cancellous bone graft and cement. A 10- to 15-year follow-up of 60 revision arthroplasties", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, pp.391~395 (1998)