본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of periodontitis-associated oral biofilm formation under dynamic and static conditions

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of single- and dual-species in vitro oral biofilms made by static and dynamic methods. Methods: Hydroxyapatite (HA) disks, 12.7 mm in diameter and 3 mm thick, were coated with processed saliva for 4 hours. The disks were divided into a static method group and a dynamic method group. The disks treated with a static method were cultured in 12-well plates, and the disks in the dynamic method group were cultured in a Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) biofilm reactor for 72 hours. In the single- and dual-species biofilms, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis were used, and the amount of adhering bacteria, proportions of species, and bacterial reduction of chlorhexidine were examined. Bacterial adhesion was examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Results: Compared with the biofilms made using the static method, the biofilms made using the dynamic method had significantly lower amounts of adhering and looser bacterial accumulation in SEM and CLSM images. The proportion of P. gingivalis was higher in the dynamic method group than in the static method group; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, the biofilm thickness and bacterial reduction by chlorhexidine showed no significant differences between the 2 methods. Conclusions: When used to reproduce periodontal biofilms composed of F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis, the dynamic method (CDC biofilm reactor) formed looser biofilms containing fewer bacteria than the well plate. However, this difference did not influence the thickness of the biofilms or the activity of chlorhexidine. Therefore, both methods are useful for mimicking periodontitis-associated oral biofilms.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of single- and dual-species in vitro oral biofilms made by static and dynamic methods. Methods: Hydroxyapatite (HA) disks, 12.7 mm in diameter and 3 mm thick, were coated with processed saliva for 4 hours. The disks were divided into a static method group and a dynamic method group. The disks treated with a static method were cultured in 12-well plates, and the disks in the dynamic method group were cultured in a Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) biofilm reactor for 72 hours. In the single- and dual-species biofilms, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis were used, and the amount of adhering bacteria, proportions of species, and bacterial reduction of chlorhexidine were examined. Bacterial adhesion was examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Results: Compared with the biofilms made using the static method, the biofilms made using the dynamic method had significantly lower amounts of adhering and looser bacterial accumulation in SEM and CLSM images. The proportion of P. gingivalis was higher in the dynamic method group than in the static method group; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, the biofilm thickness and bacterial reduction by chlorhexidine showed no significant differences between the 2 methods. Conclusions: When used to reproduce periodontal biofilms composed of F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis, the dynamic method (CDC biofilm reactor) formed looser biofilms containing fewer bacteria than the well plate. However, this difference did not influence the thickness of the biofilms or the activity of chlorhexidine. Therefore, both methods are useful for mimicking periodontitis-associated oral biofilms.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Costerton JW, "Bacterial biofilms : a common cause of persistent infections", Science, 284, pp.1318~1322 (1999)
  2. Hall-Stoodley L, "Bacterial biofilms : from the natural environment to infectious diseases", Nat Rev Microbiol, 2, pp.95~108 (2004)
  3. Filoche S, "Oral biofilms : emerging concepts in microbial ecology", J Dent Res, 89, pp.8~18 (2010)
  4. Kolenbrander PE, "Communication among oral bacteria", Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 66, pp.486~505 (2002)
  5. Ximénez-Fyvie LA, "Comparison of the microbiota of supra-and subgingival plaque in health and periodontitis", J Clin Periodontol, 27, pp.648~657 (2000)
  6. Paster BJ, "Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque", J Bacteriol, 183, pp.3770~3783 (2001)
  7. Blanc V, "Characterization and application of a flow system for in vitro multispecies oral biofilm formation", J Periodontal Res, 49, pp.323~332 (2014)
  8. 박종화, "A periodontitis-associated multispecies model of an oral biofilm", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 44(2), pp.79~84 (2014), 대한치주과학회
  9. Walker C, "An in vitro biofilm model of subgingival plaque", Oral Microbiol Immunol, 22, pp.152~161 (2007)
  10. Guggenheim B, "Validation of an in vitro biofilm model of supragingival plaque", J Dent Res, 80, pp.363~370 (2001)
  11. Thomas WE, "Bacterial adhesion to target cells enhanced by shear force", Cell, 109, pp.913~923 (2002)
  12. Ding AM, "Shear-enhanced oral microbial adhesion", Appl Environ Microbiol, 76, pp.1294~1297 (2010)
  13. Goeres DM, "Statistical assessment of a laboratory method for growing biofilms", Microbiology, 151, pp.757~762 (2005)
  14. Rudney JD, "A reproducible oral microcosm biofilm model for testing dental materials", J Appl Microbiol, 113, pp.1540~1553 (2012)
  15. Saunders KA, "The formation of mixed culture biofilms of oral species along a gradient of shear stress", J Appl Microbiol, 89, pp.564~572 (2000)
  16. Haffajee AD, "Microbial etiological agents of destructive periodontal diseases", Periodontol 2000, 5, pp.78~111 (1994)
  17. Okuda T, "Synergy in biofilm formation between Fusobacterium nucleatum and Prevotella species", Anaerobe, 18, pp.110~116 (2012)
  18. Fonseca AP, "Effect of shear stress on growth, adhesion and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with antibiotic-induced morphological changes", Int J Antimicrob Agents, 30, pp.236~241 (2007)
  19. Cotter JJ, "Characterization of a modified rotating disk reactor for the cultivation of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm", J Appl Microbiol, 109, pp.2105~2117 (2010)
  20. Saito Y, "Stimulation of Fusobacterium nucleatum biofilm formation by Porphyromonas gingivalis", Oral Microbiol Immunol, 23, pp.1~6 (2008)
  21. Abiko Y, "Profiling of subgingival plaque biofilm microflora from periodontally healthy subjects and from subjects with periodontitis using quantitative real-time PCR", J Periodontal Res, 45, pp.389~395 (2010)
  22. Loozen G, "Inter-bacterial correlations in subgingival biofilms : a large-scale survey", J Clin Periodontol, 41, pp.1~10 (2014)
  23. Shaddox LM, "Perpetuation of subgingival biofilms in an in vitro model", Mol Oral Microbiol, 25, pp.81~87 (2010)
  24. Fraud S, "Activity of amine oxide against biofilms of Streptococcus mutans : a potential biocide for oral care formulations", J Antimicrob Chemother, 56, pp.672~677 (2005)
  25. Hope CK, "In vitro assessment of the plaque-removing ability of hydrodynamic shear forces produced beyond the bristles by 2 electric toothbrushes", J Periodontol, 74, pp.1017~1022 (2003)
  26. Thurnheer T, "Multiplex FISH analysis of a six-species bacterial biofilm", J Microbiol Methods, 56, pp.37~47 (2004)
  27. Pratten J, "In vitro studies of the effect of antiseptic-containing mouthwashes on the formation and viability of Streptococcus sanguis biofilms", J Appl Microbiol, 84, pp.1149~1155 (1998)
  28. Dû LD, "Identification of saliva-regulated genes of Streptococcus gordonii DL1 by differential display using random arbitrarily primed PCR", Infect Immun, 68, pp.4834~4837 (2000)
  29. Ahn SJ, "Roles of salivary proteins in the adherence of oral streptococci to various orthodontic brackets", J Dent Res, 81, pp.411~415 (2002)
  30. Morris EJ, "Adherence of Streptococcus sanguis to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite : evidence for two binding sites", Infect Immun, 43, pp.656~663 (1984)
  31. Lamont RJ, "Role of the Streptococcus gordonii SspB protein in the development of Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilms on streptococcal substrates", Microbiology, 148, pp.1627~1636 (2002)
  32. Maeda K, "Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Streptococcus oralis functions as a coadhesin for Porphyromonas gingivalis major fimbriae", Infect Immun, 72, pp.1341~1348 (2004)
  33. Kaplan CW, "The Fusobacterium nucleatum outer membrane protein RadD is an arginine-inhibitable adhesin required for inter-species adherence and the structured architecture of multispecies biofilm", Mol Microbiol, 71, pp.35~47 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

A periodontitis-associated multispecies model of an oral biofilm박종화, 엄흥식, 이시영, 이재관, 장범석대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2014 · 제44권 제2호An in vitro model of Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis in single- and dual-species biofilmsAna Cláudia Pavarina, Beatriz Helena Dias Panariello, Erica Dorigatti de Avila, Lívia Jacovassi Tavares, Marlise Inêz Klein대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2018 · 제48권 제1호Effects of antibacterial mouth rinses on multiple oral biofilms modelSoo-Kyung Jun, Young-Suk Choi한국치위생학회 · 한국치위생학회지2023 · 제23권 제4호Antimicrobial effect of toothbrush with light emitting diode on dental biofilm attached to zirconia surface: an in vitro study김용건, 박종휴, 엄흥식, 이시영, 이재관, 장범석대한턱관절교합학회 · 구강회복응용과학지2019 · 제35권 제3호The bactericidal effect of an atmospheric-pressure plasma jet on Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilms on sandblasted and acid-etched titanium discs김경화, 김곤호, 류인철, 박신영, 설양조, 윤성영, 이용무, 이지윤대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2019 · 제49권 제5호Phototoxic effect of blue light on the planktonic and biofilm state of anaerobic periodontal pathogens송현화, 엄흥식, 이민구, 이시영, 이재관, 장범석대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2013 · 제43권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)