본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

Improvement Plan Through NONAGREEMENT CONSULTATION Analysis of Small Scale Environmental Impact Assessment

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Purpose: Small-scale environmental impact assessment means an assessment conducted by surveying, forecasting, and assessing the appropriateness of a site location and the environmental impact to provide ecological conservation measures when it is intended to implement a development project in an area requiring planned development. However, there are many cases of raising problems because of environmental information's lack and uncertainty about ecological issues. Therefore, this study aimed to improve the small-scale environmental impact assessment consultation for the development project by analyzing the reasons for the nonagreement of consultation work, focusing on regulations related to the environment and law. Method: This study analyzed 357 cases notified the result of ‘nonagreement’ consultation of small-scale environmental impact assessments for 9 years from 2012 to 2020. We conducted a one-way ANOVA analysis to determine the differences in the reasons for nonagreement consultation by year, by consulting agency, by project zone, and by project type. Post-hoc analysis was performed by the Scheff test. To conduct statistical analysis, we used Spss Statistics 21 statistical program. Results: The sharp increase in the number of yearly nonagreements in 2018 can be attributed to en-vironmental policy variations following government change in 2017. This increase is because the basis for determining the contents of small-scale environmental impact assessment consultations has become more stringent. We believe that the high rate of nonagreement consultation regarding guidelines and regulations in 2018 and 2019 is also an amendment in environmental policy following the change of government in 2017. The ratio of energy projects was high as the reason for nonagreement consultation by project type. It is believed that this result was inevitable to lead to ‘nonagreement’ because the Ministry of Environment established the ‘Environmental effects evaluation consultation guideline for inland solar power generation’ in 2018 to limit the location of solar power plants. Conclusion: To efficiently operate the small-scale environmental impact assessment and achieve the environmental assessment objectives, the Ministry of Environment should apply the relaxed criteria as a detailed guideline for each area in small-scale environmental impact assessments with small areas. Also, the differences in the analysis results by year and by consulting agency seem to be because most of the consultation workers are public administrative officers, and their working departments were changed according to the interchange of personnel every year. Public officials in charge of consultation are bound to rely on consultation review institutions such as the Korea Environment Institute, the Korea Environment Corporation, the National Institute of Ecology, and the National Institute of Environmental Research. They have no choice but to rely on them. Therefore, we suggest that the officials in charge of consultation should be technical officials rather than administrative officials to improve their professionalism. For efficient operation, frequent personnel transfers of public officials in charge of consultation should also be improved.

Abstract

Purpose: Small-scale environmental impact assessment means an assessment conducted by surveying, forecasting, and assessing the appropriateness of a site location and the environmental impact to provide ecological conservation measures when it is intended to implement a development project in an area requiring planned development. However, there are many cases of raising problems because of environmental information's lack and uncertainty about ecological issues. Therefore, this study aimed to improve the small-scale environmental impact assessment consultation for the development project by analyzing the reasons for the nonagreement of consultation work, focusing on regulations related to the environment and law. Method: This study analyzed 357 cases notified the result of ‘nonagreement’ consultation of small-scale environmental impact assessments for 9 years from 2012 to 2020. We conducted a one-way ANOVA analysis to determine the differences in the reasons for nonagreement consultation by year, by consulting agency, by project zone, and by project type. Post-hoc analysis was performed by the Scheff test. To conduct statistical analysis, we used Spss Statistics 21 statistical program. Results: The sharp increase in the number of yearly nonagreements in 2018 can be attributed to en-vironmental policy variations following government change in 2017. This increase is because the basis for determining the contents of small-scale environmental impact assessment consultations has become more stringent. We believe that the high rate of nonagreement consultation regarding guidelines and regulations in 2018 and 2019 is also an amendment in environmental policy following the change of government in 2017. The ratio of energy projects was high as the reason for nonagreement consultation by project type. It is believed that this result was inevitable to lead to ‘nonagreement’ because the Ministry of Environment established the ‘Environmental effects evaluation consultation guideline for inland solar power generation’ in 2018 to limit the location of solar power plants. Conclusion: To efficiently operate the small-scale environmental impact assessment and achieve the environmental assessment objectives, the Ministry of Environment should apply the relaxed criteria as a detailed guideline for each area in small-scale environmental impact assessments with small areas. Also, the differences in the analysis results by year and by consulting agency seem to be because most of the consultation workers are public administrative officers, and their working departments were changed according to the interchange of personnel every year. Public officials in charge of consultation are bound to rely on consultation review institutions such as the Korea Environment Institute, the Korea Environment Corporation, the National Institute of Ecology, and the National Institute of Environmental Research. They have no choice but to rely on them. Therefore, we suggest that the officials in charge of consultation should be technical officials rather than administrative officials to improve their professionalism. For efficient operation, frequent personnel transfers of public officials in charge of consultation should also be improved.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Han EJ, "Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Assessment", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 5(1), pp.87~94 (1996)
  2. 박지현, "환경영향평가 사후관리의 발전방향 설정과 실천전략 모색", 환경영향평가, 25(3), pp.165~174 (2016), 한국환경영향평가학회[DOI]
  3. Jangwoo Lee, "A Study on the Revitalization of Forest Management by Improving the Implementation Rate of FOREST Projects", International Journal of Human & Disaster, 5(2), pp.1~9 (2020), J-INSTITUTE[DOI]
  4. Korea’s Environmental Assessment Strategies for Sustainable Society, "Lee YJ", Korea Environment Institute, ~ (2017)
  5. Lee HC, "A Study on Developmental Strategies of Policy for Biodiversity Canservation", Regional Development Institute, 10(10), pp.317~334 (2002)
  6. Lee Hyang-ju, "HUMAN & DISASTER: A Study of Prediction on the Species Number and Naturalization Index of Land Naturalized Plants", International Journal of Human & Disaster, 5(1), pp.10~23 (2020), J-INSTITUTE[DOI]
  7. A Study on the Evaluation Method of Assessment Item by Evaluation Items of Environmental Impact Assessment and Evaluation System, "Choi SG", Ministry of Environment, ~ (2004)
  8. 김진오, "지방자치단체의 환경영향평가 제도 운영현황 및 개선방안 - 서울, 제주, 부산, 대전 등 8개 지자체를 중심으로-", 환경영향평가, 29(2), pp.132~143 (2020), 한국환경영향평가학회
  9. 최준규, "환경영향평가 문제의 원인 및 연계성 분석을 통한 제도개선 연구", 환경영향평가, 17(1), pp.11~24 (2008), 한국환경영향평가학회
  10. 홍상표, "지속가능성과 환경평가의 연계에 관한 연구", 환경영향평가, 20(3), pp.269~279 (2011), 한국환경영향평가학회
  11. Choi SH, "Development of Forest Ecosystem Assessment Technique of Environmental Impact Assessment ( II ) : Nature Evaluation of Vegetation", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 5(2), pp.33~47 (1996)
  12. Jeong YM, "A Study on the Systematization of the Legal Framework for Environmental Impact Assessment Systems", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment,, 13(3), pp.195~209 (2001)
  13. Kang SY, "Environmental Impact Assessment Policy in Korea", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 6(2), pp.29~33 (1997)
  14. Changjun Kim, "A Study on the CHANGE in Plants of the Wind Power Complex in Mt. Hyeonjong", Protection Convergence, 5(2), pp.1~13 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
  15. Chang CK, "Regulatory Development of Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 2(2), pp.95~103 (1993)
  16. Jeon Mi-ja, "An Investigation on Developing the Shelter and Safety Facilities of FOREST KINDERGARTENS", Protection Convergence, 5(1), pp.42~53 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
  17. 이종호, "토지환경 및 자연생태환경을 고려한 환경영향평가 협의결정 개선방안", 환경영향평가, 29(1), pp.45~60 (2020), 한국환경영향평가학회
  18. Kwon Gi-seok, "A Study on the Actual Condition and Improvement Plan of Hierachical SAFETY Management in Natural Parks", International Journal of Crisis & Safety, 5(1), pp.21~34 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
  19. The Study of the Improvement of Minor Environmental Impact Assessment, "Lee SB", Korea Environment Institute, ~ (2018)
  20. 박지현, "환경영향평가의 평가항목 이용현황 분석을 통한 평가항목 조정 및 운영체계 개선안 도출", 환경영향평가, 27(1), pp.1~16 (2018), 한국환경영향평가학회[DOI]
  21. Jeongdeok Hong, "An Investigation on the Differences of Management in LANDSCAPE Construction Projects", Public Value, 5(2), pp.32~38 (2020), J-INSTITUTE

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)