본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

환경평가제도개선에 관한 연구 -국내외 환경평가제도의 비교 고찰-

Study on the Improvement of the Environmental Assessment system -Comparison of Environmental Impact Assessment System among Different Countries-

유현석|정종관|송철우|한상욱|김임순|정성언|신강수
한국환경영향평가학회 (Korean Society Of Environmental Impact Assessment)|2011.06|환경영향평가 (Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment)|제20권 제3호|pp. 411-424

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Sustainable DevelopmentSEAEIA
주제분류환경공학

초록

Over the past three decades, Korea has undertaken a series of reforms to improve development policy, plans and programs, including measures to mainstream the environment across all major sectors. Despite of these efforts, there has been still the lack of capacity to fully assess the environmental impacts as well as sustainable implications of development projects and strategies. At the level of regional and sectoral development plans, the development of strategic environmental assessment SEA systems continues to remain at a relatively early stage in the region with fewer examples of fully operational processes or effective practice. This study shows a further information to our understanding of the EIA and SEA systems and their implementation in Korea. It affords a number of insights into strengths and weaknesses of the current action in different countries, and identifies an agenda of needs and options for capacity building for implementing the EIA enactment.

Abstract

Over the past three decades, Korea has undertaken a series of reforms to improve development policy, plans and programs, including measures to mainstream the environment across all major sectors. Despite of these efforts, there has been still the lack of capacity to fully assess the environmental impacts as well as sustainable implications of development projects and strategies. At the level of regional and sectoral development plans, the development of strategic environmental assessment SEA systems continues to remain at a relatively early stage in the region with fewer examples of fully operational processes or effective practice. This study shows a further information to our understanding of the EIA and SEA systems and their implementation in Korea. It affords a number of insights into strengths and weaknesses of the current action in different countries, and identifies an agenda of needs and options for capacity building for implementing the EIA enactment.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 김임순, "최신환경영향평가 -이론과 실 제" (2003), 동화기술
  2. 환경영향평가법 전부개정 법 률안, "대한민국국회", ~ (2009)
  3. 한상욱, "환경평가의 새로운 패러다임과 대응 과제", 전략환경평가포럼-KEI 정책자료 집, pp.31~114 (2007)
  4. 해외환경관국제동향보고 2011년,in UN ESCAP Green Economy, Green Growth의 개념 및 관련 쟁점, "환경부", 42~44 (2011)
  5. 諸外の環境影響評制度調査報 告書: 米, "環境􆨅", オランダ, ~, pp.韓, 1-1-3-41 (2004)
  6. 諸外の環境影響評制度調査報 告書: 英, カナダ, ドイツ, フランス,イタ リア, 中, EU, i-xi, "環境􆨅", ~ (2005)
  7. 環境影響評評法の一部を改正する法 律案, "環境􆨅", ~ (2011)
  8. 平成20年度環境影響評技 術手法等にする海外知見及び事例調査業務 報告書, "ERM日本株式?社", 27~79 (2009)
  9. Barry Sadler, "International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment", 1~36 (1996)
  11. DG ENV, Study concerning the report on the application and effectiveness of the EIA Directive, Final report, JUNE, "European Commission", JUNE, 1~222 (2009)
  12. DG ENV, Study concerning the report on the application and effectiveness of the SEA Directive (2001, "42", EC)Final report,April, pp.2009, 1~153
  13. Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice, "IAIA", 1~4 (1999)
  14. IAIA, "The Linkages Between Impact Assessment and the Sustainable Development Agenda and Recommendations for Actions", Statements and Policy Briefing for the World Summit on Sustainable Development Submitted by International Association for Impact Assessment August 2002, pp.1~16 (2002)
  15. IAIA, "IMPACT ASSESSMENT in the CORPORATE CONTEXT, In Business & Industry Series 1" (2002)
  16. IAIA, "SEA Performance Criteria, in Special Publication Series No.1", pp.1~ (2002)
  17. IAIA, "Social Impact Assessment,International Principles, In Special Publications Series No.2,1-15", pp.1~15 (2003)
  18. IAIA, "BIODIVERSITY IN IMPACT ASSESSMENT, In Special Publication Series No.3,1-4", pp.1~4 (2005)
  19. IAIA, "Guidelines for IA Lead Professionals", 1~2 (2006)
  20. IAIA, "Public Participation Best Practice Principles, In Special Publications Series No.4, pp.1-3", pp.1~3 (2006)
  21. IAIA, "Health Impact Assessment, International Best Practice Principles, In Special Publication Series No.5", pp.1~4 (2006)
  22. IAIA, "EIA Follow-up, In Special Publications Series No.6", pp.1~4 (2007)
  23. What is IA, "IAIA", 1~4 (2009)
  24. IAIA, "Guideline Standards for IA Professionals", indd, 10(10), pp.1~4 (2010)
  25. EA and Intergration of the Environment into Strategic Decision making Final Report, May 2001, "ICON", 1~9, pp.CEC Contract No. 134-3040 (2001), 99[DOI]
  26. The Relationship EIA and SEA Directives, "Imperial College London Consultants", 15~17 (2005)
  27. Mayor of Faro, "Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on improving The EIA and SEA Directives", 84th plenary session 14 and 15 April 2010, pp.1~8 (2010)
  28. National Environmental Conflict Resolution Advisory Committee, Final Report, "NECRAC", ubmitted to the U.S. Institutefor Environmental Conflict Resolution ofthe Morris K. Udall Foundation, 1~ (2005)
  29. NCEA, "Views and Experiences from the Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment", pp.8~25 (2009)
  30. OECD, "The DAC Guidelines Strategies for Sustainable Development", 1~73 (2001)
  31. OECD Insight Sustainable Development; Linking Economy,Society,Environment, "OECD", 1~6 (2008)
  32. OECD Economic Surveys: KOREA, June 2010, "OECD", 1~21 (2010)
  33. Green Growth Strategy, "OECD", 1~7 (2011)
  34. “Opening Statement”, Second Green Growth Policy Dialogue: the Role of Public Policy in Providing Sustainable Consumption Choices: the Resource-saving Society and Green Growth, Beijing, 23 to 25 May 2006, "Rae Kwon Chung", 1~116 (2006)
  35. A New ERA in Sustainable Development; An 11ED Briefing, "Steve Bass", 1~4 (2007)
  36. Thomas B Fischer, "On the role(s) of (strategic) environmental assessment in ‘greening’ decision making Department of Civic Design", pp.1~22 (2009), University of Liverpool
  37. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development United Nations General Assembly A, "42", 427, pp.1987, ~
  38. Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, "United Nations", Johannesburg, 1~167 (2002)
  39. The History of Sustainable Development in the United Nations, "UNCSD", 1~ (2009)
  40. UNEP, "EIA Training Resource Manual 2nd Edition", pp.539~545 (2002), Revised
  41. UNEP, "Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards an Integrated Approach", pp.113~133 (2004)
  42. Integrated Assessment and planning for Sustainable Development, "UNEP", 1~25 (2004)
  43. Global Green New Deal _ A Policy Brief, "UNEP", 19~28 (2009)
  44. Towards a Green Economy, pathway to Sustainable Development and poverty Eradication, A Synthesis for policy makes, "UNEP", 3~6 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

국내외 전략환경평가 대상계획 비교 연구권영한, 오진관한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2015 · 제24권 제3호환경영향평가 문제의 원인 및 연계성 분석을 통한 제도개선 연구서성철, 주용준, 최준규한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2008 · 제17권 제1호환경영향평가 사후관리의 발전방향 설정과 실천전략 모색박지현, 최준규한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2016 · 제25권 제3호환경영향평가 변경협의 및 재협의 제도 고찰 - 국내외 제도 운용현황을 중심으로 -김진오, 주용준한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2021 · 제30권 제5호환경영향평가의 평가항목 이용현황 분석을 통한 평가항목 조정 및 운영체계 개선안 도출박지현, 최준규한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2018 · 제27권 제1호전략환경평가 사후관리 해외 사례 분석박주양, 조한나한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2015 · 제24권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)

Google Earth를 활용한 포항 송도해수욕장의 해안선 변화 감시(2003-2010)엄정섭, 최진호pp. 257-267지속가능성과 환경평가의 연계에 관한 연구홍상표pp. 269-279강원도 남대천, 연곡천과 사천천의 식물플랑크톤 군집김용진, 이옥민pp. 281-297도시기후 형성 요소를 고려한 공간유형 분류 -창원시를 대상으로 -송봉근, 박경훈pp. 299-311RUSLE 기법을 이용한 경주지역의 토양침식 위험도 평가유주한, 오정학, 김경태, 이우성pp. 313-324
원문 보기