본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Anesthetic efficacy in vital asymptomatic teeth using different local anesthetics: a systematic review with network meta-analysis

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various local anesthesia (LA) in vital asymptomatic teeth. Materials and Methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing pulpal anesthesia of various LA on vital asymptomatic teeth were included in this review. Searches were conducted in the Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar and 3 field-specific journals from inception to May 3, 2019. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool were done by 2 independent reviewers in duplicate. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed within the frequentist setting using STATA 15.0. The LA was ranked, and the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) line was plotted. The confidence of the NMA estimates was assessed using the CINeMA web application. Results: The literature search yielded 1,678 potentially eligible reports, but only 42 were included in this review. For maxillary buccal infiltration, articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000 was more efficacious than lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000 (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–3.89). For mandibular buccal infiltration, articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000 was more efficacious than various lidocaine solutions. The SUCRA ranking was highest for articaine 4% with epinephrine when used as maxillary and mandibular buccal infiltrations, and lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:80,000 when used as inferior alveolar nerve block. Inconsistency and imprecision were detected in some of the NMA estimates. Conclusions: Articaine 4% with epinephrine is superior when maxillary or mandibular infiltration is required in vital asymptomatic teeth.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various local anesthesia (LA) in vital asymptomatic teeth. Materials and Methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing pulpal anesthesia of various LA on vital asymptomatic teeth were included in this review. Searches were conducted in the Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar and 3 field-specific journals from inception to May 3, 2019. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool were done by 2 independent reviewers in duplicate. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed within the frequentist setting using STATA 15.0. The LA was ranked, and the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) line was plotted. The confidence of the NMA estimates was assessed using the CINeMA web application. Results: The literature search yielded 1,678 potentially eligible reports, but only 42 were included in this review. For maxillary buccal infiltration, articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000 was more efficacious than lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000 (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–3.89). For mandibular buccal infiltration, articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000 was more efficacious than various lidocaine solutions. The SUCRA ranking was highest for articaine 4% with epinephrine when used as maxillary and mandibular buccal infiltrations, and lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:80,000 when used as inferior alveolar nerve block. Inconsistency and imprecision were detected in some of the NMA estimates. Conclusions: Articaine 4% with epinephrine is superior when maxillary or mandibular infiltration is required in vital asymptomatic teeth.

참고문헌 (67)

  1. Malamed SF, "Handbook of local anesthesia" (2014), Elsevier Health Sciences
  2. Sreekumar K, "Comparison of onset and duration of action of soft tissue and pulpal anesthesia with three volumes of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia", Oral Maxillofac Surg, 15, pp.195~199 (2011)
  3. Franz-Montan M, "Liposomal encapsulation improves the duration of soft tissue anesthesia but does not induce pulpal anesthesia", J Clin Anesth, 22, pp.313~317 (2010)
  4. Katyal V., "The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis", J Dent, 38, pp.307~317 (2010)
  5. Su N, "Efficacy and safety of mepivacaine compared with lidocaine in local anaesthesia in dentistry: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials", Int Dent J, 64, pp.96~107 (2014)
  6. Tu YK, "Use of generalized linear mixed models for network meta-analysis", Med Decis Making, 34, pp.911~918 (2014)
  7. Caldwell DM, "Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence", BMJ, 331, pp.897~900 (2005)
  8. Zanjir M, "Efficacy and safety of pulpal anesthesia strategies during endodontic treatment of permanent mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis", J Endod, 45, pp.1435~1464 (2019)
  9. Su YX, "Statistical approaches to adjusting weights for dependent arms in network meta-analysis", Res Synth Methods, 9, pp.431~440 (2018)
  10. Hutton B, "The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations", Ann Intern Med, 162, pp.777~784 (2015)
  11. American Association of Endodontists, "AAE consensus conference recommended diagnostic terminology", J Endod, 35, pp.1634~ (2009)
  12. Higgins JP, "Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies", Res Synth Methods, 3, pp.98~110 (2012)
  13. Tu YK, "Using generalized linear mixed models to evaluate inconsistency within a network meta-analysis", Value Health, 18, pp.1120~1125 (2015)
  14. Lu G, "Assessing evidence inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons", J Am Stat Assoc, 101, pp.447~459 (2006)
  15. Yu-Kang T, "Node-splitting generalized linear mixed models for evaluation of inconsistency in network meta-analysis", Value Health, 19, pp.957~963 (2016)
  16. Mbuagbaw L, "Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses", Syst Rev, 6, pp.79~ (2017)
  17. Nikolakopoulou A, "CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis", PLoS Med, 17, pp.e1003082~ (2020)
  18. Aberg G, "Studies on the duration of local anesthesia. Effects of volume and concentration of a local anesthetic solution on the duration of dental infiltration anesthesia", Int J Oral Surg, 7, pp.141~147 (1978)
  19. Caldas CS, "Clinical evaluation of different ephinephrine concentration for local dental anesthesia", Rev Dor, 16, pp.1~5 (2015)
  20. Costa CG, "Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration", Quintessence Int, 36, pp.197~201 (2005)
  21. Evans G, "A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations", J Endod, 34, pp.389~393 (2008)
  22. Franz-Montan M, "Efficacy of liposome-encapsulated 0.5% ropivacaine in maxillary dental anaesthesia", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 50, pp.454~458 (2012)
  23. Gross R, "A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations", J Endod, 33, pp.1021~1024 (2007)
  24. Haas DA, "Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches", Anesth Prog, 37, pp.230~237 (1990)
  25. Haas DA, "Lack of differential effect by Ultracaine (articaine) and Citanest (prilocaine) in infiltration anaesthesia", J Can Dent Assoc, 57, pp.217~223 (1991)
  26. Katz S, "A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% prilocaine for maxillary infiltrations", Anesth Prog, 57, pp.45~51 (2010)
  27. Kennedy M, "Anesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine in maxillary anterior infiltration", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 91, pp.406~412 (2001)
  28. Krzemiński TF, "Comparison of ropivacaine and articaine with epinephrine for infiltration anaesthesia in dentistry - a randomized study", Int Endod J, 44, pp.746~751 (2011)
  29. Krzemiński TF, "Comparison of ropivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine for infiltration anesthesia in dentistry. A randomized study", Am J Dent, 24, pp.305~309 (2011)
  30. Kämmerer PW, "Comparative clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations in 4% articaine for dental local infiltration anesthesia", Clin Oral Investig, 18, pp.415~421 (2014)
  31. Lawaty I, "A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% mepivacaine with 1 : 20,000 levonordefrin versus 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltrations", Anesth Prog, 57, pp.139~144 (2010)
  32. Mason R, "A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and 3% mepivacaine for maxillary infiltrations", J Endod, 35, pp.1173~1177 (2009)
  33. Mikesell A, "Anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltrations", J Endod, 34, pp.121~125 (2008)
  34. Teplitsky PE, "A comparison of bupivacaine to lidocaine with respect to duration in the maxilla and mandible", J Can Dent Assoc, 53, pp.475~478 (1987)
  35. Tófoli GR, "Efficacy of liposome-encapsulated mepivacaine for infiltrative anesthesia in volunteers", J Liposome Res, 21, pp.88~94 (2011)
  36. Wiziack Zago PM, "Anesthetic efficacy of liposomal prilocaine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia", J Liposome Res, 21, pp.81~87 (2011)
  37. Jaber A, "The efficacy of infiltration anaesthesia for adult mandibular incisors: a randomised double-blind cross-over trial comparing articaine and lidocaine buccal and buccal plus lingual infiltrations", Br Dent J, 209, pp.E16~ (2010)
  38. Kanaa MD, "Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study", J Endod, 32, pp.296~298 (2006)
  39. Martin M, "Anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL versus 3.6 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as a primary buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar", J Endod, 37, pp.588~592 (2011)
  40. Maruthingal S, "A comparative evaluation of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine in mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a clinical study", J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 5, pp.463~469 (2015)
  41. McEntire M, "Anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine versus 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine as a primary buccal infiltration in the mandibular first molar", J Endod, 37, pp.450~454 (2011)
  42. Nydegger B, "Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study", J Endod, 40, pp.1912~1916 (2014)
  43. Robertson D, "The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth", J Am Dent Assoc, 138, pp.1104~1112 (2007)
  44. Yonchak T, "Anesthetic efficacy of infiltrations in mandibular anterior teeth", Anesth Prog, 48, pp.55~60 (2001)
  45. Branco FP, "A double-blind comparison of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 0.5% levobupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine for the inferior alveolar nerve block", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 101, pp.442~447 (2006)
  46. Dagher FB, "An evaluation of 2% lidocaine with different concentrations of epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block", J Endod, 23, pp.178~180 (1997)
  47. Donaldson D, "A comparison of Ultracaine DS (articaine HCl) and Citanest forte (prilocaine HCl) in maxillary infiltration and mandibular nerve block", J Can Dent Assoc, 53, pp.38~42 (1987)
  48. Ernberg M, "Ropivacaine for dental anesthesia: a dose-finding study", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 60, pp.1004~1010 (2002)
  49. Fernandez C, "A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks", J Endod, 31, pp.499~503 (2005)
  50. Hinkley SA, "An evaluation of 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin compared with 2% lidocaine with:100,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block", Anesth Prog, 38, pp.84~89 (1991)
  51. McLean C, "An evaluation of 4% prilocaine and 3% mepivacaine compared with 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) for inferior alveolar nerve block", J Endod, 19, pp.146~150 (1993)
  52. Mikesell P, "A comparison of articaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks", J Endod, 31, pp.265~270 (2005)
  53. Moore PA, "The anesthetic efficacy of 4 percent articaine 1:200,000 epinephrine: two controlled clinical trials", J Am Dent Assoc, 137, pp.1572~1581 (2006)
  54. Petersen JK, "A comparison of four commonly used local analgesics", Int J Oral Surg, 6, pp.51~59 (1977)
  55. Tortamano IP, "Onset and duration period of pulpal anesthesia of articaine and lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block", Braz Dent J, 24, pp.371~374 (2013)
  56. Tófoli GR, "Comparison of effectiveness of 4% articaine associated with 1: 100,000 or 1: 200,000 epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve block", Anesth Prog, 50, pp.164~168 (2003)
  57. Vreeland DL, "An evaluation of volumes and concentrations of lidocaine in human inferior alveolar nerve block", J Endod, 15, pp.6~12 (1989)
  58. Wali M, "Prospective, randomized single-blind study of the anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 and 3.6 milliliters of 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block", J Endod, 36, pp.1459~1462 (2010)
  59. Yared GM, "Evaluation of lidocaine in human inferior alveolar nerve block", J Endod, 23, pp.575~578 (1997)
  60. Tsuchiya H, "Dental anesthesia in the presence of inflammation: pharmacological mechanisms for the reduced efficacy of local anesthetics", Int J Clin Anesthesiol, 4, pp.1059~ (2016)
  61. Kung J, "Does articaine provide an advantage over lidocaine in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis", J Endod, 41, pp.1784~1794 (2015)
  62. Nagendrababu V, "Efficacy of local anaesthetic solutions on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials", Int Endod J, 52, pp.779~789 (2019)
  63. Naci H, "Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices before approval", Lancet, 395, pp.986~997 (2020)
  64. Reader A, "Taking the pain out of restorative dentistry and endodontics: current thoughts and treatment options to help patients achieve profound anesthesia", pp.1~8 (2009), American Association of Endodontists
  65. Malamed SF, "Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic", J Am Dent Assoc, 132, pp.177~185 (2001)
  66. Latham JL, "Infiltrative anesthesia in office practice", Am Fam Physician, 89, pp.956~962 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

The success rate of bupivacaine and lidocaine as anesthetic agents in inferior alveolar nerve block in teeth with irreversible pulpitis without spontaneous painHamed Manochehrifar, Masoud Parirokh, Mohammad Hosein Yosefi, Nouzar Nakhaee, Paul V. Abbott대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2015 · 제40권 제2호Buccal infiltration injection without a 4% articaine palatal injection for maxillary impacted third molar surgeryChakorn Vorakulpipat, Chavengkiat Saengsirinavin, Kumar K C, Manus Rojvanakarn, Natthamet Wongsirichat, Som Sochenda대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2020 · 제46권 제4호The feasibility of needleless jet injection versus conventional needle local anesthesia during dental procedures: a systematic reviewAlreem Ahmed Alameeri, Amel Murad, Arwa AlHamwi, Hessa AlFandi AlShamsi, Mariam Mahmoud Alhammadi, Marwan Mansoor Mohammed, Meznah Hamad Alketbi, Natheer Hashim Al Rawi, Sausan Al Kawas, Shishir Ram Shetty대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2022 · 제48권 제6호Effectiveness of dexamethasone or adrenaline with lignocaine 2% for prolonging inferior alveolar nerve block: a randomized controlled trialAbanish Singh, Md Shakeel Ahmad, Saroj Prasad Deo대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2022 · 제48권 제1호Effects of different topical anesthetics on pain from needle insertion and injection, and the influence of anxiety in patients awaiting endodontic treatmentAksoy Fatih, Tosun Samet대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2022 · 제47권 제3호Efficacy of buccal piroxicam infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trialBansal Mukta, Nandamuri Sridevi, Paul Saurav, Raina Aakrati대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2021 · 제46권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)