Buccal infiltration injection without a 4% articaine palatal injection for maxillary impacted third molar surgery
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: Palatal infiltration is the most painful and uncomfortable anesthesia technique for maxillary impacted third molar surgery (MITMS). This approach could cause patients distress and aversion to dental treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of a buccal infiltra-tion injection without a palatal injection in MITMS. Materials and Methods: This prospective research study was a crossover split mouth-randomized controlled trial. Twenty-eight healthy symmetrical bilateral MITMS patients (mean age, 23 years) were randomly assigned to two groups. Buccal infiltration injections without palatal injections were designated as the study group and the buccal with palatal infiltration cases were the control group, using 4% articaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine. The operation started after 10 minutes of infiltration. Pain assessment was done using a visual analogue scale and a numeric rating scale after each injection and extraction procedure. Similarly, the success rate, hemodynamic parameters, and additional requested local anesthetic were assessed. Results: The results showed that the pain associated with local anesthetic injections between both groups were significantly different. However, the success rates between the groups were not significantly different. Postoperative pain was not significant between both groups and a few patients re-quested an additional local anesthetic, but the results were not statistically significant. For hemodynamic parameters, there was a significant difference in systolic pressure during incision, bone removal, and tooth elevation. In comparison, during the incision stage there was a significant difference in diastolic pressure; however, other steps in the intervention were not significantly different between groups.Conclusion: We concluded that buccal infiltration injection without palatal injection can be an alternative technique instead of the conventional injec-tion for MITMS.
Abstract
Objectives: Palatal infiltration is the most painful and uncomfortable anesthesia technique for maxillary impacted third molar surgery (MITMS). This approach could cause patients distress and aversion to dental treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of a buccal infiltra-tion injection without a palatal injection in MITMS. Materials and Methods: This prospective research study was a crossover split mouth-randomized controlled trial. Twenty-eight healthy symmetrical bilateral MITMS patients (mean age, 23 years) were randomly assigned to two groups. Buccal infiltration injections without palatal injections were designated as the study group and the buccal with palatal infiltration cases were the control group, using 4% articaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine. The operation started after 10 minutes of infiltration. Pain assessment was done using a visual analogue scale and a numeric rating scale after each injection and extraction procedure. Similarly, the success rate, hemodynamic parameters, and additional requested local anesthetic were assessed. Results: The results showed that the pain associated with local anesthetic injections between both groups were significantly different. However, the success rates between the groups were not significantly different. Postoperative pain was not significant between both groups and a few patients re-quested an additional local anesthetic, but the results were not statistically significant. For hemodynamic parameters, there was a significant difference in systolic pressure during incision, bone removal, and tooth elevation. In comparison, during the incision stage there was a significant difference in diastolic pressure; however, other steps in the intervention were not significantly different between groups.Conclusion: We concluded that buccal infiltration injection without palatal injection can be an alternative technique instead of the conventional injec-tion for MITMS.
참고문헌 (23)
- McCoy JM, "Complications of retention: pathology associated with retained third molars", Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 20, pp.177~195 (2012)[DOI]
- Rakprasitkul S, "Pathologic changes in the pericoronal tissues of unerupted third molars", Quintessence Int, 32, pp.633~638 (2001)
- Colombini BL, "Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal : a double-blind, randomized, crossover study", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 102, pp.169~174 (2006)[DOI]
- McArdle BF, "Painless palatal anesthesia", J Am Dent Assoc, 128, pp.647~ (1997)[DOI]
- Gregorio LV, "A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine)for lower third molar removal", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 106, pp.19~28 (2008)[DOI]
- Malamed SF, "Handbook of local anesthesia", pp.79~ (2012), Mosby
- Isik K, "Comparison of depth of anesthesia in different parts of maxilla when only buccal anesthesia was done for maxillary teeth extraction", Int J Dent, 2011, pp.575874~ (2011)[DOI]
- Lima-Júnior JL, "Evaluation of the buccal vestibule-palatal diffusion of 4% articaine hydrochloride in impacted maxillary third molar extractions", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 14, pp.E129~E132 (2009)
- Bataineh AB, "Extraction of maxillary teeth using articaine without a palatal injection : a comparison between the anterior and posterior regions of the maxilla", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 75, pp.87~91 (2017)[DOI]
- Uckan S, "Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 102, pp.733~735 (2006)[DOI]
- Badcock ME, "A blinded randomized controlled trial comparing lignocaine and placebo administration to the palate for removal of maxillary third molars", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 36, pp.1177~1182 (2007)[DOI]
- Fan S, "Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 107, pp.359~363 (2009)[DOI]
- Lima JL Jr, "Comparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1 : 100, 000 and 1 : 200, 000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis : a pilot study", Anesth Prog, 60, pp.42~45 (2013)[DOI]
- Woo-Hyun Park, "Study on the position of the posterior superior alveolar artery in relation to the performance of the maxillary sinus bone graft procedure in a Korean population", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 38(2), pp.71~77 (2012), 대한구강악안면외과학회[DOI]
- Lima TC, "Pre-emptive effect of dexamethasone and diclofenac sodium associated with codeine on pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery: a split-mouth, randomized, triple-blind, controlled clinical trial", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 76, pp.60~66 (2018)[DOI]
- Sharma K, "Maxillary posterior teeth removal without palatal injection -truth or myth: a dilemma for oral surgeons", J Clin Diagn Res, 8, pp.ZC01~ZC04 (2014)[DOI]
- Somuri AV, "Extraction of permanent maxillary teeth by only buccal infiltration of articaine", J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 12, pp.130~132 (2013)[DOI]
- Martin M, "Anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL versus 3.6 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000epinephrine as a primary buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar", J Endod, 37, pp.588~592 (2011)[DOI]
- Brand HS, "Cardiovascular responses induced by dental treatment", Eur J Oral Sci, 104, pp.245~252 (1996)[DOI]
- Sapira JD, "Human epinephrine secretion. Direct measurement of the secretion of epinephrine from the human adrenal medulla", J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 33, pp.436~447 (1971)[DOI]
- Lipp M, "Exogenous and endogenous plasma levels of epinephrine during dental treatment under local anesthesia", Reg Anesth, 18, pp.6~12 (1993)
- Troullos ES, "Plasma epinephrine levels and cardiovascular response to high administered doses of epinephrine contained in local anesthesia", Anesth Prog, 34, pp.10~13 (1987)
- de Morais HH, "Hemodynamic changes comparing lidocaine HCl with epinephrine and articaine HCl with epinephrine", J Craniofac Surg, 23, pp.1703~1708 (2012)[DOI]