A study on collision strength assessment of a jack-up rig with attendant vessel
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The rapid proliferation of oil/gas drilling and wind turbine installations with jack-up rig-formed structures increases structural safety requirements, due to the greater risks of operational collisions during use of these structures. Therefore, current industrial practices and regulations have tended to increase the required accidental collision design loads (impact energies) for jack-up rigs. However, the existing simplified design approach tends to be limited to the design and prediction of local members due to the difficulty in applying the increased uniform impact energy to a brace member without regard for the member’s position. It is therefore necessary to define accidental load estimation in terms of a reasonable collision scenario and its application to the structural response analysis. We found by a collision probabilistic approach that the kinetic energy ranged from a minimum of 9 MJ to a maximum 1049 MJ. Only 6% of these values are less than the 35MJ recommendation of DNV-GL (2013). This study assumed and applied a representative design load of 196.2MN for an impact load of 20,000 tons. Based on this design load, the detailed design of a leg structure was numerically verified via an FE analysis comprising three categories: linear analysis, buckling analysis and progressive collapse analysis. Based on the numerical results from this analysis, it was possible to predict the collapse mode and position of each member in relation to the collision load. This study provided a collision strength assessment between attendant vessels and a jack-up rig based on probabilistic collision scenarios and nonlinear structural analysis. The numerical results of this study also afforded reasonable evaluation criteria and specific evaluation procedures.
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of oil/gas drilling and wind turbine installations with jack-up rig-formed structures increases structural safety requirements, due to the greater risks of operational collisions during use of these structures. Therefore, current industrial practices and regulations have tended to increase the required accidental collision design loads (impact energies) for jack-up rigs. However, the existing simplified design approach tends to be limited to the design and prediction of local members due to the difficulty in applying the increased uniform impact energy to a brace member without regard for the member’s position. It is therefore necessary to define accidental load estimation in terms of a reasonable collision scenario and its application to the structural response analysis. We found by a collision probabilistic approach that the kinetic energy ranged from a minimum of 9 MJ to a maximum 1049 MJ. Only 6% of these values are less than the 35MJ recommendation of DNV-GL (2013). This study assumed and applied a representative design load of 196.2MN for an impact load of 20,000 tons. Based on this design load, the detailed design of a leg structure was numerically verified via an FE analysis comprising three categories: linear analysis, buckling analysis and progressive collapse analysis. Based on the numerical results from this analysis, it was possible to predict the collapse mode and position of each member in relation to the collision load. This study provided a collision strength assessment between attendant vessels and a jack-up rig based on probabilistic collision scenarios and nonlinear structural analysis. The numerical results of this study also afforded reasonable evaluation criteria and specific evaluation procedures.
참고문헌 (29)
- Ahmed, M. P. M., "Probabilistic approach to risk analysis of powered vessel collisions with offshore platforms", Ocean Eng, 151, pp.206~221 (2017)
- Amdahl, J., "ISUM for offshore frame structures", Proc. ASME 2016. 35th Int. Conf. On Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2016-55053 (2016)
- AND, "European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by InlandWaterways", United National Economic Commission for Europe, ~ (2011)
- ANSYS, "LS-DYNA", User’s Manual for ANSYS, ANSYS Inc, pp.2016, ~
- Bela, A., "Ship collision analysis on offshore wind turbine monopile foundations", Mar. Struct, 51, pp.220~241 (2017)
- BV, "Rules for the Classification of Offshore Units. NR 445. D1 DT R04 E", ~ (2013)
- Dai, L., "Risk of collision between service vessels and offshore wind turbines", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf, 109, pp.18~31 (2013)
- DNV, "Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C104, B. Collision", Det Norske Veritas, ~ (2012)
- DNV, "Offshore Service Specification DNV-OSS-201, 2.2 Additional Technical Requirements Stipulated by PSA", Det Norske Veritas, ~ (2013)
- The World Wide Offshore Accident Databank (WOAD), "JDNV", Safety WOAD, ~ (2017)
- Hassel, M., "Allision risk analysis of offshore petroleum installations on the Norwegian Continental Shelfdan empirical study of vessel traffic patterns", WMU J. Marit. Aff, 16, pp.175~195 (2017)[DOI]
- Haugen, S., "Risk and Reliability in Marine Technology" (1998), Rotterdam
- Development of Explanatory Notes for Harmonized SOLAS Chapter II-1:Approval Procedure Concept for Alternative Arrangements, "IMO", International Maritime Organization, ~ (2003)
- Kim, Y. S., "Environmental consequences associated with collisions involving double hull oil tanker", Ships Offshore Struct, 10(5), pp.479~487 (2015)
- 김상진, "A study on fire design accidental loads for aluminum safety helidecks", International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 8(6), pp.519~529 (2016), 대한조선학회
- Moan, T., "Assessment of ship impact risk to offshore structuresdnew NORSOK N-003 guidelines", Mar. Struct, 63, pp.480~494 (2019)
- Moan, T., "Risk assessment of FPSOs with emphasis on collision", ABS Tech. Pap, pp.199~229 (2002)
- "NORSOK STANDARD N-003, Actions and action effects", ~ (2007)
- "NORSOK STANDARD N-004, Design of steel structure", ~ (2004)
- Seo, J. K., "A methodology for determining efficient gas detector locations on offshore installations", Ships Offshore Struct, 8(5), pp.524~535 (2013)
- Spouge, J. R., "A Guide to Quantitative Risk Assessment for Offshore Installations", DNVTechnical, Det Norske Veritas, ~ (1999)
- Storheim, M., "Design of offshore structures against accidental ship collisions", Mar. Struct, 37, pp.135~172 (2014)[DOI]
- Teh, K. L., "Centrifuge model study of spudcan penetration in sand overlying clay", Geotechnique, 60, pp.825~842 (2010)
- Vinnem, J. E., "Offshore Risk Assessment : Principles, Modelling and Applications of QRA Studies" (2007), Springer
- Ye, K. Q., "Orthogonal column Latin hypercube and their application in computer experiments", J. Am. Stat. Assoc, 93(444), pp.121~128 (1998)
- Youssef, S. A. M., "A new method for assessing the safety of ships damaged by collisions", Ships Offshore Struct, 12(6), pp.862~872 (2017)
- Yu, Z., "Analysis and design of offshore tubular members against ship impacts", Mar. Struct, 58, pp.109~135 (2018)
- Zhang, S., "Collisions damage assessment of ships and jack-up rigs", Ships Offshore Struct, 5302, pp.1~9 (2015)[DOI]
- Zhang, W., "An advanced method for detecting possible near miss ship collisions from AIS data", Ocean Eng, 124, pp.141~156 (2016)[DOI]