A comparison of magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling devices: an in vitro study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The effects of magnetostrictive and piezoelectric devices on tooth surfaces seem to differ with regard to the root surface roughness they produce. This study aimed to compare the results of scaling using magnetostrictive and piezoelectric devices on extracted teeth. Methods: Forty-four human extracted teeth were assigned to four study groups (n=11). In two groups (C100 and C200), the teeth were scaled using a magnetostrictive device and two different lateral forces: 100 g and 200 g, respectively. In the other two groups (P100 and P200), the teeth were scaled with a piezoelectric device with 100 g and 200 g of lateral force, respectively. The teeth were scaled and the data on the duration of scaling and the amount of surface were collected and analyzed using the t-test. Results: The mean time needed for instrumentation for the piezoelectric and magnetostrictive devices was 50:54 and 41:10,respectively, but their difference was not statistically significant (P=0.171). For root surface roughness, we only found a statistically significantly poorer result for the C200 group in comparison to the P200 group (P=0.033). Conclusions: This study revealed that applying a piezoelectric scaler with 200 g of lateral force leaves smoother surfaces than a magnetostrictive device with the same lateral force.
Abstract
Purpose: The effects of magnetostrictive and piezoelectric devices on tooth surfaces seem to differ with regard to the root surface roughness they produce. This study aimed to compare the results of scaling using magnetostrictive and piezoelectric devices on extracted teeth. Methods: Forty-four human extracted teeth were assigned to four study groups (n=11). In two groups (C100 and C200), the teeth were scaled using a magnetostrictive device and two different lateral forces: 100 g and 200 g, respectively. In the other two groups (P100 and P200), the teeth were scaled with a piezoelectric device with 100 g and 200 g of lateral force, respectively. The teeth were scaled and the data on the duration of scaling and the amount of surface were collected and analyzed using the t-test. Results: The mean time needed for instrumentation for the piezoelectric and magnetostrictive devices was 50:54 and 41:10,respectively, but their difference was not statistically significant (P=0.171). For root surface roughness, we only found a statistically significantly poorer result for the C200 group in comparison to the P200 group (P=0.033). Conclusions: This study revealed that applying a piezoelectric scaler with 200 g of lateral force leaves smoother surfaces than a magnetostrictive device with the same lateral force.
참고문헌 (13)
- Rosling B, "The use of PVP-iodine as an adjunct to non-surgical treatment of chronic periodontitis", J Clin Periodontol, 28, pp.1023~1031 (2001)
- Obeid PR, "Comparative clinical responses related to the use of various periodontal instrumentation", J Clin Periodontol, 31, pp.193~199 (2004)
- Petersilka GJ, "Safety and efficiency of novel sonic scaler tips in vitro", J Clin Periodontol, 30, pp.551~555 (2003)
- Jotikasthira NE, "Comparative in vitro studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments", J Clin Periodontol, 19, pp.560~569 (1992)
- Copulos TA, "Comparative analysis between a modified ultrasonic tip and hand instruments on clinical parameters of periodontal disease", J Periodontol, 64, pp.694~700 (1993)
- Schenk G, "Lack of antimicrobial effect on periodontopathic bacteria by ultrasonic and sonic scalers in vitro", J Clin Periodontol, 27, pp.116~119 (2000)
- Arabaci T, "Sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontal treatment: a review", Int J Dent Hyg, 5, pp.2~12 (2007)
- Flemmig TF, "Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro", J Periodontol, 69, pp.547~553 (1998)
- Busslinger A, "A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument", J Clin Periodontol, 28, pp.642~649 (2001)
- Kocher T, "Methodology of three-dimensional determination of root surface roughness", J Periodontal Res, 37, pp.125~131 (2002)
- Leknes KN, "Influence of tooth instrumentation roughness on subgingival microbial colonization", J Periodontol, 65, pp.303~308 (1994)
- Flemmig TF, "The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro", J Clin Periodontol, 25, pp.158~163 (1998)
- Santos FA, "Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo", Clin Oral Investig, 12, pp.143~150 (2008)