Gracey curet과 Ultrasonic scaler 사용 시의 치면 특성의 주사현미경적 연구
Scanning electron microscopic study on characteristics of tooth surface when using gracey curet and ultrasonic scaler
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the characteristics of tooth surface after using Gracy curet and Ultrasonic scaler Methods: In this study, 12 teeth extracted were used. 12 specimens were divided into three groups with the same numbers, which were classified into Control group, Gracy curet use group, and Ultrasonic scaler use group, and after performing instrument operation, we measured the roughness and the loss degree of tooth surface by using SEM. Results: In groups using Gracy curet and Ultrasonic scaler, the roughness and the loss of tooth surface increased significantly(p<0.05). In the roughness of groups using Gracy curet and Ultrasonic scaler, Ultrasonic scaler group was higher in crown, but Gracy curet group was higher in root. As a result of observation through SEM, the roughness and the loss degree increased in order of Control group, Ultrasonic scaler use group, and Gracy curet use group. Conclusions: Taken together above results, both hand instrument and ultrasound equipment create roughness and loss in crown and in root, and hand instruments makes rougher than ultrasonic instruments in root, so it is thought to require thorough and accurate technical application not to damage tooth surface when removing plaque.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the characteristics of tooth surface after using Gracy curet and Ultrasonic scaler Methods: In this study, 12 teeth extracted were used. 12 specimens were divided into three groups with the same numbers, which were classified into Control group, Gracy curet use group, and Ultrasonic scaler use group, and after performing instrument operation, we measured the roughness and the loss degree of tooth surface by using SEM. Results: In groups using Gracy curet and Ultrasonic scaler, the roughness and the loss of tooth surface increased significantly(p<0.05). In the roughness of groups using Gracy curet and Ultrasonic scaler, Ultrasonic scaler group was higher in crown, but Gracy curet group was higher in root. As a result of observation through SEM, the roughness and the loss degree increased in order of Control group, Ultrasonic scaler use group, and Gracy curet use group. Conclusions: Taken together above results, both hand instrument and ultrasound equipment create roughness and loss in crown and in root, and hand instruments makes rougher than ultrasonic instruments in root, so it is thought to require thorough and accurate technical application not to damage tooth surface when removing plaque.
참고문헌 (21)
- Chung SH, "A comparison of effectiveness of gracey curet and ultrasonic curet on subgingival scaling and root planning", 석사, pp.2000
- Kim YH, "Oral prophylaxis", pp.24~25 (2006), Chung-gu
- Parveen Dahiya P, "Comparative evaluation of hand and power-driven instruments on root surface characteristics: A scanning electron microscopy study", Contemp Clin Dent, 2(2), pp.79~83 (2011)[DOI]
- Kerry GJ, "Roughness of root surfaces after use of ultrasonic instruments and hand curettes", J Periodontal, 38(4), pp.340~346 (1967)
- Caffesse RG, "Scaling and root planing with or without periodontal flap surgery", J Clin Periodontol, 13(3), pp.205~210 (1986)
- Greenstein G, "Periodontal response to mechanical nonsurgical therapy, A review", J Periodontol, 63(2), pp.118~130 (1992)
- Wylam JM, "The clinical effectiveness of open versus closed scaling and root planning on multi-rooted teeth", J Periodontol, 64(11), pp.1023~1028 (1993)
- Kang BW, "Medical laws for dental hygienist", pp.256~ (2016), Komoonsa
- Nield-Gehrig JS, "Fundamentals of periodontal instrumentation" (2013), DaehanNarae publishing
- Nam YO, "Dental Hygieology", pp.19~20 (2011), Chung-gu
- Mombelli A, "Antibiotecs in periodontal therapy in clinical periodontology and implant dentistry", pp.1~50 (1998), Munksgaard
- Corbet EF, "The periodontallyinvolved root surface", J Clin Periodontol, 20(6), pp.402~410 (1993)
- Jeong MK, "Root surface roughness change according to the scaling techniques and fluoride application", 박사, pp.2012
- Cercek JF, "Relative effects of plaque control and instrumentation on the clinical parameters of human periodontal desease", J Clin Periodontol, 10(1), pp.46~56 (1993)
- Garrett JS, "Root planing :a perspective", J Periodontol, 48(9), pp.553~557 (1977)
- Won BY, "Oral prophylaxis", pp.263~264 (2013), Chung-gu
- Zappa U, "Root substance removal by scaling and root planing", J Periodontol, 62(12), pp.750~754 (1991)
- Garnick JJ, "A scanning electron micrographical study of root surfaces and subgingival bacteria after hand and ultrasonic instrumentation", J Periodontol, 60(8), pp.441~447 (1989)[DOI]
- Schlageter L, "Root surface smoothness or roughness following open debridment. An in vivo study", J Clin Periodontol, 23(5), pp.460~464 (1996)
- Kodher T, "Subgingival polishing with a teflon-cated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth(Ⅱ). Subgingival roughness", J Clin Periodontol, 28(8), pp.723~729 (2001)
- Lee HS, "Surface roughness of porcelain by the different method of scaling treatment", 석사, pp.1996