Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on periimplant marginal bone loss in the posterior region: a five-year retrospective study
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio on the change in marginal bone level around the implant and to determine the site-related factors influencing the relationship between the C/I ratio and periimplant marginal bone loss. Methods: A total of 259 implants from 175 patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of five years. Implants were divided into two groups according to their C/I ratios: ≤ 1, and >1. Site-related factors having an influence on the relationship between C/I ratio and periimplant marginal bone loss were analyzed according to the implant location, implant diameter, implant manufacturer, prosthesis type, and guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure. Results: It was found that 1) implants with a C/I ratio below 1 exhibited greater periimplant marginal bone loss than implants with a C/I ratio more than 1, 2) site-related factors had an effect on periimplant marginal bone loss, except for the implant system used, 3) the C/I ratio was the factor having more dominant influence on periimplant marginal bone loss, compared with implant diameter, prosthesis type, implant location, and GBR procedure, 4) implants with a C/I ratio below 1 showed greater periimplant marginal bone loss than implants with a C/I ratio greater than 1 in the maxilla, but not in the mandible, 5) and periimplant marginal bone loss was more affected by the implant system than the C/I ratio. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, implants with a higher C/I ratio exhibited less marginal bone loss than implants with a lower C/I ratio in the posterior regions. The C/I ratio was a more dominant factor affecting periimplant marginal bone loss in the maxilla than the mandible. Meanwhile, the implant system was a more dominant factor influencing periimplant marginal bone loss than the C/I ratio.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio on the change in marginal bone level around the implant and to determine the site-related factors influencing the relationship between the C/I ratio and periimplant marginal bone loss. Methods: A total of 259 implants from 175 patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of five years. Implants were divided into two groups according to their C/I ratios: ≤ 1, and >1. Site-related factors having an influence on the relationship between C/I ratio and periimplant marginal bone loss were analyzed according to the implant location, implant diameter, implant manufacturer, prosthesis type, and guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure. Results: It was found that 1) implants with a C/I ratio below 1 exhibited greater periimplant marginal bone loss than implants with a C/I ratio more than 1, 2) site-related factors had an effect on periimplant marginal bone loss, except for the implant system used, 3) the C/I ratio was the factor having more dominant influence on periimplant marginal bone loss, compared with implant diameter, prosthesis type, implant location, and GBR procedure, 4) implants with a C/I ratio below 1 showed greater periimplant marginal bone loss than implants with a C/I ratio greater than 1 in the maxilla, but not in the mandible, 5) and periimplant marginal bone loss was more affected by the implant system than the C/I ratio. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, implants with a higher C/I ratio exhibited less marginal bone loss than implants with a lower C/I ratio in the posterior regions. The C/I ratio was a more dominant factor affecting periimplant marginal bone loss in the maxilla than the mandible. Meanwhile, the implant system was a more dominant factor influencing periimplant marginal bone loss than the C/I ratio.
참고문헌 (25)
- Grossmann Y, "The prosthodontic concept of crown-to-root ratio: a review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 93, pp.559~562 (2005)
- Dykema RW, "Diagnosis and Treatment Planning, In Johnston’s modern practice in fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed", pp.8~21 (1986), WB Saunders
- Shillingburg HT Jr, "Treatment Planning for the Replacement of Missing Teeth, In Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed", pp.89~90 (1997), Quintessence Publishing
- Nyman S, "The capacity of reduced periodontal tissues to support fixed bridgework", J Clin Periodontol, 9, pp.409~414 (1982)
- Laurell L, "Long-term prognosis of extensive polyunit cantilevered fixed partial dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 66, pp.545~552 (1991)
- Yi SW, "Long-term follow-up of cross-arch fixed partial dentures in patients with advanced periodontal destruction. Evaluation of the supporting tissues", Acta Odontol Scand, 53, pp.242~248 (1995)
- Bidez MW, "Clinical Biomechanics in Implant Dentistry, In Contemporary implant dentistry", pp.543~555 (2008), Mosby Elsevier
- Brose MO, "Submerged alumina dental root implants in humans: five-year evaluation", J Prosthet Dent, 61, pp.594~601 (1989)
- Nasr HF, "A proposed radiographic index for assessment of the current status of osseointegration", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.323~328 (1993)
- Haas R, "Brånemark single tooth implants: a preliminary report of 76 implants", J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp.274~279 (1995)
- Glantz PO, "Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic implant-borne reconstructions", Periodontol 2000, 17, pp.119~124 (1998)
- Schulte J, "Crown-to-implant ratios of single tooth implant-supported restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.1~5 (2007)
- Verhoeven JW, "Reliability of some clinical parameters of evaluation in implant dentistry", J Oral Rehabil, 27, pp.211~216 (2000)
- Updegrave WJ, "Right-angle dental radiography", Dent Clin North Am, 12, pp.571~579 (1968)
- Urdaneta RA, "The effect of increased crown-to-implant ratio on single-tooth locking-taper implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.729~743 (2010)
- Rangert BR, "Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, pp.360~370 (1997)
- Pilliar RM, "Bone ingrowth and stress shielding with a porous surface coated fracture fixation plate", J Biomed Mater Res, 13, pp.799~810 (1979)
- Rokni S, "An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.69~76 (2005)
- Blanes RJ, "A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.707~714 (2007)
- Sekine H, "Mobility Characteristics and Tactile Sensitivity of Osseointegrated Implant-Supporting Systems, In Tissue integration in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction", pp.326~339 (1986), Excerpta Medica
- Misch CE, "Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 57, pp.700~706 (1999)
- Akca K, "Biomechanical consequences of progressive marginal bone loss around oral implants: a finite element stress analysis", Med Biol Eng Comput, 44, pp.527~535 (2006)
- Aalam AA, "Clinical evaluation of dental implants with surfaces roughened by anodic oxidation, dual acid-etched implants, and machined implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.793~798 (2005)
- Abrahamsson I, "Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20(4), pp.207~215 (2009)
- Tawil G, "Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.275~282 (2006)