A parametric study on the use of passive fire protection in FPSO topside module
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Fire is a continuous threat to FPSO topside modules as large amounts of oil and gas are passing throughthe modules. As a conventional measure to mitigate structural failure under fire, passive fire protection (PFP) coatingsare widely used on main structural members. However, an excessive use of PFP coatings can cause considerable costfor material purchase, installation, inspection and maintenance. Long installation time can be a risk since the workshould be done nearly at the last fabrication stage. Thus, the minimal use of PFP can be beneficial to the reduction ofconstruction cost and the avoidance of schedule delay. This paper presents a few case studies on how different applicationsof PFP have influence on collapse time of a FPSO module structure. A series of heat analysis and thermalelasto-plastic FE analysis are performed for different PFP coatings and the resultant collapse time and the amount ofPFP coatings are compared with each other.
Abstract
Fire is a continuous threat to FPSO topside modules as large amounts of oil and gas are passing throughthe modules. As a conventional measure to mitigate structural failure under fire, passive fire protection (PFP) coatingsare widely used on main structural members. However, an excessive use of PFP coatings can cause considerable costfor material purchase, installation, inspection and maintenance. Long installation time can be a risk since the workshould be done nearly at the last fabrication stage. Thus, the minimal use of PFP can be beneficial to the reduction ofconstruction cost and the avoidance of schedule delay. This paper presents a few case studies on how different applicationsof PFP have influence on collapse time of a FPSO module structure. A series of heat analysis and thermalelasto-plastic FE analysis are performed for different PFP coatings and the resultant collapse time and the amount ofPFP coatings are compared with each other.
참고문헌 (14)
- Amdahl, J., "Ultimate strength members of members with attachments during accidenttal fires", International Conference Response of Structures to Extreme Loading (2003)
- Andersen, C., "Risk reduction by use of passive fire protection - A study regarding implementation of new installations offshore", 석사, pp.2008
- BSI, "Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures, Part 1-2: General rules - Structural fire design" (2005), British Standards
- FABIG, "Technical note 11 : fire loading and structural response" (2010), The Steel Construction Institute
- Jin, Y., "A study on probabilistic scenario based fire risk analysis for FPSO structure", Proceedings of the 27th Asian-Pacific Technincal Exchange and Advisory Meeting on Marine Structures, TEAM 2013 (2013)
- CFD calculation of impinging gas jet flame, "Johnson, A. D.", HSE, ~, pp.OTO 1999 (1999), 011
- Kinsella, E., "Tools for thermal analysis of intumescent materials", 석사, pp.2011
- Krohn, A. B. A., "Measurement of conductivity of intumescing material", 석사, pp.2009
- NORSOK, "Technical Safety S-001", Norwegian Technology Standards Institution, ~ (2000)
- Thermal properties of passive fire protection material, proposal of test method, "Opstad, K.", Petrell AS, ~, pp.Report No.10-51575-RP-001-V01 (2010)
- Shettya, N. K., "Fire safety assessment and optimal design of passive fire protection for offshore structures", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 61(1-2), pp.439~149 (1998)
- Shirvill, L. C., "Performance of passive fire protection in jet fires, major hazards onshore and offshore", Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series (1992)
- USFOS, "FAHTS user’s manual", USFOS A, 2011
- USFOS, "USFOS user’s manual", USFOS A, 2011