Explosion induced dynamic responses of blast wall on FPSO topside: Blast loading application methods
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Topside areas on an offshore oil and gas platform are highly susceptible to explosion. A blast wall on these areas plays an important role in preventing explosion damage and must withstand the expected explosion loads. The uniformly distributed loading condition, predicted by Explosion Risk Analyses (ERAs), has been applied in most of the previous analysis methods. However, analysis methods related to load conditions are inaccurate because the blast overpressure around the wall tends to be of low-level in the open area and high-level in the enclosed area. The main objectives of this paper are to study the effects of applying different load applications and compare the dynamic responses of the blast wall. To do so, various kinds of blast pressures were measured by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations on the target area. Nonlinear finite element analyses of the blast wall under two types of identified dynamic loadings were also conducted.
Abstract
Topside areas on an offshore oil and gas platform are highly susceptible to explosion. A blast wall on these areas plays an important role in preventing explosion damage and must withstand the expected explosion loads. The uniformly distributed loading condition, predicted by Explosion Risk Analyses (ERAs), has been applied in most of the previous analysis methods. However, analysis methods related to load conditions are inaccurate because the blast overpressure around the wall tends to be of low-level in the open area and high-level in the enclosed area. The main objectives of this paper are to study the effects of applying different load applications and compare the dynamic responses of the blast wall. To do so, various kinds of blast pressures were measured by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations on the target area. Nonlinear finite element analyses of the blast wall under two types of identified dynamic loadings were also conducted.
참고문헌 (26)
- API, "Recommended Practice for the Design of Offshore Facilities against Fire and Blast Loading", American Petroleum Institute, ~ (2006)
- Brill, A., "A method for measuring the impulse on structural foundations due to a blast wave", Int. J. Impact Eng, 49, pp.214~221 (2012)
- Chille, F., "Use of CFD Tools for Prediction of Explosion Loads. Handling Exceptions in Structural Engineering", 13~14 (2008)
- Chung Kim, "Experimental and numerical studies on the response of quadrangular stiffened plates. Part 1: subjected to uniform blast load.", Int. J. Impact Eng, 31(1), pp.55~83 (2005)
- Dan, S. K., "Quantitative risk analysis of fire and explosion on the top-side LNG-liquefaction process of LNG-FPSO", Process Saf. Environ. Prot, 92, pp.430~441 (2014)
- Martin Friebe, "A parametric study on the use of passive fire protection in FPSO topside module", International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 6(4), pp.826~839 (2014), 대한조선학회
- Geng, J., "Blast wave clearing behavior for positive and negative phases", J. Loss Prev. Process Indus, 37, pp.143~151 (2015)
- Gexcon, A. S., "FLACS v10.3 User's Manual", ~ (2014)
- Guo, J., "Effect of ignition position on vented hydrogen-air explosions", Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, pp.1~9 (2015)
- Hansen, O. R., "Validation of FLACS against experimental data sets from the model evaluation database for LNG vapor dispersion", J. Loss Prev. Process Indus, 23, pp.857~877 (2010)
- Hansen, O. R., "Improved far-field blast predictions from fast deflagrations, DDTs and detonations of vapour clouds using FLACS CFD", J. Loss Prev. Process Indus, 35, pp.293~306 (2015)
- Health & Safety Executive, "Structural strengthening of offshore topsides structures as part of explosion risk reduction methods", Res. Rep, 489, pp.9~27 (2006)
- Kang, K. Y., "Dynamic response of structural model according to characteristics of gas explosion topside platform", Ocean Eng, 113, pp.174~190 (2016)
- Kauthammer, T., "Negative phase effects on glass panels", Int. J. Impact Eng, 24, pp.1~17 (2000)
- Langdon, G. S., "Deformation and failure of profiled stainless steel blast wall panels. Part Ⅲ: finite element simulations and overall summary", Int. J. Impact Eng, 32, pp.988~1012 (2006)
- Louca, L. A., "Improving the ductile behaviour of offshore topside structures under extreme loads", Eng. Struct, 30, pp.506~521 (2008)
- Livermore Software Technology Corporation, "LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual", ~ (2007)
- Mazurkiewicz, L., "Blast loading influence on load carrying capacity of I-column", Eng. Struct, 104, pp.107~115 (2015)
- Moghimi, H., "Performance assessment of steel plate shear walls under accidental blast loads", J. Constr. Steel Res, 106, pp.44~56 (2015)
- Nguyen, T. P., "Response of vertical wall structures under blast loading by dynamic analysis", Procedia Eng, 14, pp.3308~3316 (2011)
- Rigby, S. E., "Elasticeplastic response of plates subjected to cleared blast loads", Int. J. Impact Eng, 66, pp.37~47 (2014)
- Schleyer, G. K., "Inelastic deformation and failure of progiled stainless steel blast wall panels. Part II: analytical modelling considerations", Int. J. Impact Eng, 31, pp.371~399 (2005)
- Stolz, A., "Dynamic bearing capacity of ductile concrete plates under blast loading", Int. J. Impact Eng, 69, pp.25~38 (2014)
- UKOOA, "Fire and Explosion Guidance Part 1: Avoidance and Mitigation of Explosions", UK Offshore Operators Association, ~ (2003)
- Yanlin, J., "Probabilistic fire risk analysis and structural safety assessment of FPSO topside module", Ocean Eng, 104, pp.725~737 (2015)
- Zheng, X., "Simulation of the load evolution of an anchoring system under a blasting impulse load using FLAC3D", Shock Vib, 2015 (2015)