Finishing and polishing effects of multiblade burs on the surface texture of 5 resin composites: microhardness and roughness testing
3
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to test the effect of 2 finishing–polishing sequences (QB, combining a 12/15-fluted finishing bur and an EVO-Light polisher; QWB, adding a 30-fluted polishing bur after the 12/15-fluted finishing bur used in the QB sequence) on 5 nanotech-based resin composites (Filtek Z500, Ceram X Mono, Ceram X Duo, Tetric Evoceram, and Tetric Evoceram Bulk Fill) by comparing their final surface roughness and hardness values to those of a Mylar strip control group (MS). Materials and Methods: Twelve specimens of each nanocomposite were prepared in Teflon moulds. The surface of each resin composite was finished with QB (5 samples), QWB (5 samples), or MS (2 samples), and then evaluated (60 samples). Roughness was analysed with an optical profilometer, microhardness was tested with a Vickers indenter, and the surfaces were examined by optical and scanning electron microscopy. Data were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test ( p < 0.05) followed by the Dunn test. Results: For the hardness and roughness of nanocomposite resin, the QWB sequence was significantly more effective than QB ( p < 0.05). The Filtek Z500 showed significantly harder surfaces regardless of the finishing–polishing sequence ( p < 0.05). Conclusions: QWB yielded the best values of surface roughness and hardness. The hardness and roughness of the 5 nanocomposites presented less significant differences when QWB was used.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to test the effect of 2 finishing–polishing sequences (QB, combining a 12/15-fluted finishing bur and an EVO-Light polisher; QWB, adding a 30-fluted polishing bur after the 12/15-fluted finishing bur used in the QB sequence) on 5 nanotech-based resin composites (Filtek Z500, Ceram X Mono, Ceram X Duo, Tetric Evoceram, and Tetric Evoceram Bulk Fill) by comparing their final surface roughness and hardness values to those of a Mylar strip control group (MS). Materials and Methods: Twelve specimens of each nanocomposite were prepared in Teflon moulds. The surface of each resin composite was finished with QB (5 samples), QWB (5 samples), or MS (2 samples), and then evaluated (60 samples). Roughness was analysed with an optical profilometer, microhardness was tested with a Vickers indenter, and the surfaces were examined by optical and scanning electron microscopy. Data were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test ( p < 0.05) followed by the Dunn test. Results: For the hardness and roughness of nanocomposite resin, the QWB sequence was significantly more effective than QB ( p < 0.05). The Filtek Z500 showed significantly harder surfaces regardless of the finishing–polishing sequence ( p < 0.05). Conclusions: QWB yielded the best values of surface roughness and hardness. The hardness and roughness of the 5 nanocomposites presented less significant differences when QWB was used.
참고문헌 (27)
- Erdemir U, "The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites", Eur J Dent, 6, pp.198~205 (2012)
- Bollen CM, "Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention : a review of the literature", Dent Mater, 13, pp.258~269 (1997)
- Endo T, "Surface texture and roughness of polished nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites", Dent Mater J, 29, pp.213~223 (2010)
- "Elsevier SAS", 2002
- Weitman RT, "Plaque accumulation on composite surfaces after various finishing procedures", Oral Health, 65, pp.29~33 (1975)
- Yap AU, "Wear behavior of new composite restoratives", Oper Dent, 29, pp.269~274 (2004)
- O'Brien WJ, "Dental materials and their selection", pp.160~168 (1997), Quintessence Publishing
- Aytac F, "Effects of novel finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and morphology of nanocomposites", J Esthet Restor Dent, 28, pp.247~261 (2016)
- Yap AU, "Effect of hygiene maintenance procedures on surface roughness of composite restoratives", Oper Dent, 30, pp.99~104 (2005)
- Ergücü Z, "Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems", Oper Dent, 32, pp.185~192 (2007)
- Jones CS, "The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations", Br Dent J, 196, pp.42~45 (2004)
- Jefferies SR, "Three composite finishing systems : a multisite in vitro evaluation", J Esthet Dent, 4, pp.181~185 (1992)
- Daud A, "A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy", J Dent, 71, pp.25~30 (2018)
- Aydin B, "Different finishing", polishing systems effects on surface roughness, International Association for Dental Research, pp.2014, ~
- Erdemir U, "The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites", Eur J Dent, 6, pp.198~205 (2012)
- Chinelatti MA, "Evaluation of the surface hardness of composite resins before and after polishing at different times", J Appl Oral Sci, 14, pp.188~192 (2006)
- Joniot SB, "Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins", Oper Dent, 25, pp.311~315 (2000)
- Turssi CP, "Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures", Dent Mater, 21, pp.641~648 (2005)
- van Noort R, "The surface finish of composite resin restorative materials", Br Dent J, 157, pp.360~364 (1984)
- van Dijken JW, "Surface characteristics of posterior composites after polishing and toothbrushing", Acta Odontol Scand, 45, pp.337~346 (1987)
- Senawongse P, "Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing", J Esthet Restor Dent, 19, pp.265~273 (2007)
- Barbosa SH, "Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins", Braz Dent J, 16, pp.39~44 (2005)
- Uçtaşli MB, "The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials", J Contemp Dent Pract, 8, pp.89~96 (2007)
- Curtis AR, "The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites : the impact of dry and wet cyclic pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength", Dent Mater, 25, pp.188~197 (2009)
- Ferracane JL, "Resin composite--state of the art", Dent Mater, 27, pp.29~38 (2011)
- Berthault GN, "Les nouveaux composites : évaluation et intérêts cliniques pour les restaurations en technique directe", Rev Odontostomatol, 37, pp.177~197 (2008)
- Antonson SA, "Comparison of different finishing", polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites, 2011, pp.39(Supplement 1), e9~e17