Decontamination methods to restore the biocompatibility of contaminated titanium surfaces
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The reaction of cells to a titanium implant depends on the surface characteristics of the implant which are affected by decontamination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytocompatibility of titanium disks treated with various decontamination methods, using salivary bacterial contamination with dental pellicle formation as an in vitro model. Methods: Sand-blasted and acid-etched (SA) titanium disks were used. Three control groups (pristine SA disks [SA group]; salivary pellicle-coated SA disks [pellicle group]; and biofilm-coated, untreated SA disks [NT group]) were not subjected to any decontamination treatments. Decontamination of the biofilm-coated disks was performed by 14 methods, including ultrasonic instruments, rotating instruments, an air-powder abrasive system, a laser, and chemical agents. MG63 cells were cultured in the presence of the treated disks. Cell proliferation assays were performed on days 2 and 5 of cell culture, and cell morphology was analyzed by immunofluorescence and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) assay was performed on day 5 of culture. Results: The cell proliferation assay revealed that all decontaminated disks, except for the 2 groups treated using a plastic tip, showed significantly less cell proliferation than the SA group. The immunofluorescence and SEM analyses revealed that most groups showed comparable cell density, with the exception of the NT group, in which the cell density was lower and bacterial residue was observed. Furthermore, the cells grown with tetracycline-treated titanium disks showed significantly lower VEGF production than those in the SA group. Conclusions: None of the decontamination methods resulted in cytocompatibility similar to that of pristine SA titanium. However, many methods caused improvement in the biocompatibility of the titanium disks in comparison with the biofilm-coated, untreated titanium disks. This suggests that decontamination is indispensable for the treatment of peri-implantitis, even if the original biocompatibility cannot be restored.
Abstract
Purpose: The reaction of cells to a titanium implant depends on the surface characteristics of the implant which are affected by decontamination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytocompatibility of titanium disks treated with various decontamination methods, using salivary bacterial contamination with dental pellicle formation as an in vitro model. Methods: Sand-blasted and acid-etched (SA) titanium disks were used. Three control groups (pristine SA disks [SA group]; salivary pellicle-coated SA disks [pellicle group]; and biofilm-coated, untreated SA disks [NT group]) were not subjected to any decontamination treatments. Decontamination of the biofilm-coated disks was performed by 14 methods, including ultrasonic instruments, rotating instruments, an air-powder abrasive system, a laser, and chemical agents. MG63 cells were cultured in the presence of the treated disks. Cell proliferation assays were performed on days 2 and 5 of cell culture, and cell morphology was analyzed by immunofluorescence and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) assay was performed on day 5 of culture. Results: The cell proliferation assay revealed that all decontaminated disks, except for the 2 groups treated using a plastic tip, showed significantly less cell proliferation than the SA group. The immunofluorescence and SEM analyses revealed that most groups showed comparable cell density, with the exception of the NT group, in which the cell density was lower and bacterial residue was observed. Furthermore, the cells grown with tetracycline-treated titanium disks showed significantly lower VEGF production than those in the SA group. Conclusions: None of the decontamination methods resulted in cytocompatibility similar to that of pristine SA titanium. However, many methods caused improvement in the biocompatibility of the titanium disks in comparison with the biofilm-coated, untreated titanium disks. This suggests that decontamination is indispensable for the treatment of peri-implantitis, even if the original biocompatibility cannot be restored.
참고문헌 (28)
- Zitzmann NU, "Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases", J Clin Periodontol, 35, pp.286~291 (2008)
- Louropoulou A, "Influence of mechanical instruments on the biocompatibility of titanium dental implants surfaces: a systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.841~850 (2015)
- Lindhe J, "Peri-implant diseases: consensus report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology", J Clin Periodontol, 35, pp.282~285 (2008)
- Otgonbayar Unursaikhan, "Comparative evaluation of roughness of titanium surfaces treated by different hygiene instruments", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 42(3), pp.88~94 (2012), 대한치주과학회[DOI]
- Schwarz F, "Effects of an Er:YAG laser and the Vector ultrasonic system on the biocompatibility of titanium implants in cultures of human osteoblastlike cells", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.784~792 (2003)
- Augthun M, "In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces", J Periodontol, 69, pp.857~864 (1998)
- Ungvári K, "Effects on titanium implant surfaces of chemical agents used for the treatment of peri-implantitis", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 94, pp.222~229 (2010)
- Parham PL Jr, "Effects of an air-powder abrasive system on plasma-sprayed titanium implant surfaces: an in vitro evaluation", J Oral Implantol, 15, pp.78~86 (1989)
- Kreisler M, "In vitro evaluation of the biocompatibility of contaminated implant surfaces treated with an Er : YAG laser and an air powder system", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.36~43 (2005)
- Yang SM, "Use of confocal microscopy for quantification of plastic remnants on rough titanium after instrumentation and evaluation of efficacy of removal", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 30, pp.519~525 (2015)
- Park JB, "Effects of titanium brush on machined and sand-blasted", acid-etched titanium disc using confocal microscopy and contact profilometry, 2015, pp.26, 130~136
- Wennerberg A, "Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20(Suppl 4), pp.172~184 (2009)
- Mann M, "Effect of plastic-covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.76~82 (2012)
- Renvert S, "Treatment of peri-implantitis using an Er:YAG laser or an air-abrasive device: a randomized clinical trial", J Clin Periodontol, 38, pp.65~73 (2011)
- Louropoulou A, "The effects of mechanical instruments on contaminated titanium dental implant surfaces: a systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.1149~1160 (2014)
- John G, "Rotating titanium brush for plaque removal from rough titanium surfaces--an in vitro study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.838~842 (2014)
- Schwarz F, "Influence of different treatment approaches on the removal of early plaque biofilms and the viability of SAOS2 osteoblasts grown on titanium implants", Clin Oral Investig, 9, pp.111~117 (2005)
- Schwarz F, "Influence of different air-abrasive powders on cell viability at biologically contaminated titanium dental implants surfaces", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 88B, pp.83~91 (2009)
- Park JB, "Instrumentation with ultrasonic scalers facilitates cleaning of the sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants", J Oral Implantol, 41, pp.419~428 (2015)
- Schmidt KE, "Influence of different instrumentation modalities on the surface characteristics and biofilm formation on dental implant neck, in vitro", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28, pp.483~490 (2017)
- Lincks J, "Response of MG63osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition", Biomaterials, 19, pp.2219~2232 (1998)
- Bordji K, "Cytocompatibility of Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-5Al-2.5Fe alloys according to three surface treatments, using human fibroblasts and osteoblasts", Biomaterials, 17, pp.929~940 (1996)
- Park JW, "Enhanced osteoblast response to hydrophilic strontium and", or phosphate ionsincorporated titanium oxide surfaces, 2010, pp.21, 398~408
- Donley TG, "Titanium endosseous implant-soft tissue interface: a literature review", J Periodontol, 62, pp.153~160 (1991)
- Lindhe J, "Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry" (2015), John Wiley & Sons
- Tilakaratne A, "Anti-inflammatory actions of adjunctive tetracyclines and other agents in periodontitis and associated comorbidities", Open Dent J, 8, pp.109~124 (2014)
- Perret LJ, "Non-antibiotic properties of tetracyclines and their clinical application in dermatology", Australas J Dermatol, 55, pp.111~118 (2014)
- Lee S, "Processing of VEGF-A by matrix metalloproteinases regulates bioavailability and vascular patterning in tumors", J Cell Biol, 169, pp.681~691 (2005)