본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Rodent peri-implantitis models: a systematic review and meta-analysis of morphological changes

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Purpose: Rodent models have emerged as an alternative to established larger animal models for peri-implantitis research. However, the construct validity of rodent models is controversial due to a lack of consensus regarding their histological, morphological, and biochemical characteristics. This systematic review sought to validate rodent models by characterizing their morphological changes, particularly marginal bone loss (MBL), a hallmark of peri-implantitis. Methods: This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was performed electronically using MEDLINE (PubMed), and Embase, identifying pre-clinical studies reporting MBL after experimental peri-implantitis induction in rodents. Each study’s risk of bias was assessed using the Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed for the difference in MBL, comparing healthy implants to those with experimental peri-implantitis. Results: Of the 1,014 unique records retrieved, 23 studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Peri-implantitis was induced using 4 methods: ligatures, lipopolysaccharide, microbial infection, and titanium particles. Studies presented high to unclear risks of bias. During the osseointegration phase, 11.6% and 6.4%-11.3% of implants inserted in mice and rats, respectively, had failed to osseointegrate. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis of the linear MBL measured using micro-computed tomography. Following experimental peri-implantitis, the MBL was estimated to be 0.25 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14–0.36 mm) in mice and 0.26 mm (95% CI, 0.19–0.34 mm) in rats. The resulting peri-implant MBL was circumferential, consisting of supra- and infrabony components. Conclusions: Experimental peri-implantitis in rodent models results in circumferential MBL, with morphology consistent with the clinical presentation of peri-implantitis. While rodent models are promising, there is still a need to further characterize their healing potentials, standardize experiment protocols, and improve the reporting of results and methodology.

Abstract

Purpose: Rodent models have emerged as an alternative to established larger animal models for peri-implantitis research. However, the construct validity of rodent models is controversial due to a lack of consensus regarding their histological, morphological, and biochemical characteristics. This systematic review sought to validate rodent models by characterizing their morphological changes, particularly marginal bone loss (MBL), a hallmark of peri-implantitis. Methods: This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was performed electronically using MEDLINE (PubMed), and Embase, identifying pre-clinical studies reporting MBL after experimental peri-implantitis induction in rodents. Each study’s risk of bias was assessed using the Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed for the difference in MBL, comparing healthy implants to those with experimental peri-implantitis. Results: Of the 1,014 unique records retrieved, 23 studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Peri-implantitis was induced using 4 methods: ligatures, lipopolysaccharide, microbial infection, and titanium particles. Studies presented high to unclear risks of bias. During the osseointegration phase, 11.6% and 6.4%-11.3% of implants inserted in mice and rats, respectively, had failed to osseointegrate. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis of the linear MBL measured using micro-computed tomography. Following experimental peri-implantitis, the MBL was estimated to be 0.25 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14–0.36 mm) in mice and 0.26 mm (95% CI, 0.19–0.34 mm) in rats. The resulting peri-implant MBL was circumferential, consisting of supra- and infrabony components. Conclusions: Experimental peri-implantitis in rodent models results in circumferential MBL, with morphology consistent with the clinical presentation of peri-implantitis. While rodent models are promising, there is still a need to further characterize their healing potentials, standardize experiment protocols, and improve the reporting of results and methodology.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Derks J, "Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology", J Clin Periodontol, 42(Suppl 16), pp.S158~S171 (2015)
  2. Schwarz F, "Peri-implantitis", J Clin Periodontol, 45(Suppl 20), pp.S246~S266 (2018)
  3. Meffert RM, "Periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis : the same disease? The same treatment?", Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 7, pp.278~291 (1996)
  4. Roccuzzo M, "Clinical outcomes of peri-implantitis treatment and supportive care : a systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29(Suppl 16), pp.331~350 (2018)
  5. Kotsakis GA, "Peri-implantitis is not periodontitis : scientific discoveries shed light on microbiome-biomaterial interactions that may determine disease phenotype", Periodontol 2000, 86, pp.231~240 (2021)
  6. Lafaurie GI, "Microbiome and microbial biofilm profiles of peri-implantitis : a systematic review", J Periodontol, 88, pp.1066~1089 (2017)
  7. Graves DT, "The use of rodent models to investigate host-bacteria interactions related to periodontal diseases", J Clin Periodontol, 35, pp.89~105 (2008)
  8. Kantarci A, "Animal models for periodontal regeneration and peri-implant responses", Periodontol 2000, 68, pp.66~82 (2015)
  9. Hooijmans CR, "SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies", BMC Med Res Methodol, 14, pp.43~ (2014)
  10. Drevon D, "Intercoder reliability and validity of WebPlotDigitizer in extracting graphed data", Behav Modif, 41, pp.323~339 (2017)
  11. Sun J, "Development of a peri-implantitis model in the rat", Clin Oral Implants Res, 31, pp.203~214 (2020)
  12. Wu X, "Melatonin prevents peri-implantitis via suppression of TLR4", NF-κB, 2021, pp.134, 325~336
  13. Varon-Shahar E, "Peri-implant alveolar bone resorption in an innovative peri-implantitis murine model : effect of implant surface and onset of infection", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 21, pp.723~733 (2019)
  14. Tzach-Nahman R, "Oral infection with Porphyromonas gingivalis induces peri-implantitis in a murine model: Evaluation of bone loss and the local inflammatory response", J Clin Periodontol, 44, pp.739~748 (2017)
  15. Ding L, "A doxycycline-treated hydroxyapatite implant surface attenuates the progression of peri-implantitis : a radiographic and histological study in mice", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 21, pp.154~159 (2019)
  16. Ozawa R, "Redox injectable gel protects osteoblastic function against oxidative stress and suppresses alveolar bone loss in a rat peri-implantitis model", Acta Biomater, 110, pp.82~94 (2020)
  17. He Q, "Development of a rat model for type 2 diabetes mellitus peri-implantitis : a preliminary study", Oral Dis (2021)[DOI]
  18. Hori Y, "Xerostomia aggravates ligation-induced peri-implantitis : a preclinical in vivo study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 32, pp.581~589 (2021)
  19. Takamori Y, "Histopathological comparison of the onset of peri-implantitis and periodontitis in rats", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28, pp.163~170 (2017)
  20. Wong RL, "Comparing the healing potential of late-stage periodontitis and peri-implantitis", J Oral Implantol, 43, pp.437~445 (2017)
  21. Yamazaki S, "The effects of hyperglycaemia on peri-implant tissues after osseointegration", J Prosthodont Res, 64, pp.217~223 (2020)
  22. Nguyen Vo TN, "Ligature induced peri-implantitis : tissue destruction and inflammatory progression in a murine model", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28, pp.129~136 (2017)
  23. Hiyari S, "Susceptibility of different mouse strains to peri-implantitis", J Periodontal Res, 53, pp.107~116 (2018)
  24. Wang X, "Macrophage polarization in aseptic bone resorption around dental implants induced by Ti particles in a murine model", J Periodontal Res, 54, pp.329~338 (2019)
  25. Koutouzis T, "A novel rat model of polymicrobial peri-implantitis : a preliminary study", J Periodontol, 88, pp.e32~e41 (2017)
  26. Wong RL, "Early intervention of peri-implantitis and periodontitis using a mouse model", J Periodontol, 89, pp.669~679 (2018)
  27. Li H, "Glycemic fluctuation exacerbates inflammation and bone loss and alters microbiota profile around implants in diabetic mice with experimental peri-implantitis", Int J Implant Dent, 7, pp.79~ (2021)
  28. Pirih FQ, "Ligature-induced peri-implantitis in mice", J Periodontal Res, 50, pp.519~524 (2015)
  29. Pirih FQ, "A murine model of lipopolysaccharide-induced peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis", J Oral Implantol, 41, pp.e158~e164 (2015)
  30. Hiyari S, "Ligature-induced peri-implantitis and periodontitis in mice", J Clin Periodontol, 45, pp.89~99 (2018)
  31. Renvert S, "Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: case definitions and diagnostic considerations", J Periodontol, 89(Suppl 1), pp.S304~S312 (2018)
  32. Deng S, "TLR4 mediates alveolar bone resorption in experimental peri-implantitis through regulation of CD45+ cell infiltration, RANKL", OPG ratio, and inflammatory cytokine production, 2020, pp.91, 671~682
  33. Li H, "Mangiferin alleviates experimental peri-implantitis via suppressing interleukin-6 production and Toll-like receptor 2 signaling pathway", J Orthop Surg, 14, pp.325~ (2019)
  34. Pan K, "RANKL blockade alleviates peri-implant bone loss and is enhanced by anti-inflammatory microRNA-146a through TLR2", 4 signaling, 2020, pp.6, 15~
  35. Schwarz F, "Comparison of naturally occurring and ligature-induced peri-implantitis bone defects in humans and dogs", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.161~170 (2007)
  36. Freire MO, "A bacterial-biofilm-induced oral osteolytic infection can be successfully treated by immuno-targeting an extracellular nucleoid-associated protein", Mol Oral Microbiol, 32, pp.74~88 (2017)
  37. Gao SS, "Micromotions and combined damages at the dental implant", bone interface, 2012, pp.4, 182~188
  38. Watanabe T, "Differences in healing patterns of the bone-implant interface between immediately and delayed-placed titanium implants in mouse maxillae", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 18, pp.146~160 (2016)
  39. Fujii N, "A histological study on tissue responses to titanium implantation in rat maxilla : the process of epithelial regeneration and bone reaction", J Periodontol, 69, pp.485~495 (1998)
  40. Albrektsson T, "Foreign body reactions, marginal bone loss and allergies in relation to titanium implants", Eur J Oral Implantology, 11(Suppl 1), pp.S37~S46 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)