본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Impact of lattice versus solid structure of 3D-printed multiroot dental implants using Ti-6Al-4V: a preclinical pilot study

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Purpose: Various studies have investigated 3-dimensional (3D)-printed implants using Ti6Al-4V powder; however, multi-root 3D-printed implants have not been fully investigated. The purpose of this study was to explore the stability of multirooted 3D-printed implants with lattice and solid structures. The secondary outcomes were comparisons between the 2 types of 3D-printed implants in micro-computed tomographic and histological analyses. Methods: Lattice- and solid-type 3D-printed implants for the left and right mandibular third premolars in beagle dogs were fabricated. Four implants in each group were placed immediately following tooth extraction. Implant stability measurement and periapical X-rays were performed every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. Peri-implant bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) and bone mineral density (BMD) were measured by micro-computed tomography. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were measured in histomorphometric analyses. Results: All 4 lattice-type 3D-printed implants survived. Three solid-type 3D-printed implants were removed before the planned sacrifice date due to implant mobility. A slight, gradual increase in implant stability values from implant surgery to 4 weeks after surgery was observed in the lattice-type 3D-printed implants. The marginal bone change of the surviving solid-type 3D-printed implant was approximately 5 mm, whereas the value was approximately 2 mm in the lattice-type 3D-printed implants. BV/TV and BMD in the lattice type 3D-printed implants were similar to those in the surviving solid-type implant. However, BIC and BAFO were lower in the surviving solid-type 3D-printed implant than in the lattice-type 3D-printed implants. Conclusions: Within the limits of this preclinical study, 3D-printed implants of doublerooted teeth showed high primary stability. However, 3D-printed implants with interlocking structures such as lattices might provide high secondary stability and successful osseointegration.

Abstract

Purpose: Various studies have investigated 3-dimensional (3D)-printed implants using Ti6Al-4V powder; however, multi-root 3D-printed implants have not been fully investigated. The purpose of this study was to explore the stability of multirooted 3D-printed implants with lattice and solid structures. The secondary outcomes were comparisons between the 2 types of 3D-printed implants in micro-computed tomographic and histological analyses. Methods: Lattice- and solid-type 3D-printed implants for the left and right mandibular third premolars in beagle dogs were fabricated. Four implants in each group were placed immediately following tooth extraction. Implant stability measurement and periapical X-rays were performed every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. Peri-implant bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) and bone mineral density (BMD) were measured by micro-computed tomography. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were measured in histomorphometric analyses. Results: All 4 lattice-type 3D-printed implants survived. Three solid-type 3D-printed implants were removed before the planned sacrifice date due to implant mobility. A slight, gradual increase in implant stability values from implant surgery to 4 weeks after surgery was observed in the lattice-type 3D-printed implants. The marginal bone change of the surviving solid-type 3D-printed implant was approximately 5 mm, whereas the value was approximately 2 mm in the lattice-type 3D-printed implants. BV/TV and BMD in the lattice type 3D-printed implants were similar to those in the surviving solid-type implant. However, BIC and BAFO were lower in the surviving solid-type 3D-printed implant than in the lattice-type 3D-printed implants. Conclusions: Within the limits of this preclinical study, 3D-printed implants of doublerooted teeth showed high primary stability. However, 3D-printed implants with interlocking structures such as lattices might provide high secondary stability and successful osseointegration.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Ahmed HMA, "A new system for classifying root and root canal morphology", Int Endod J, 50, pp.761~770 (2017)
  2. Ahmed HMA, "Application of a new system for classifying root and canal anatomy in studies involving micro-computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography: explanation and elaboration", Int Endod J, 54, pp.1056~1082 (2021)
  3. Kumagai H, "Occlusal force distribution on the dental arch during various levels of clenching", J Oral Rehabil, 26, pp.932~935 (1999)
  4. 이유승, "Comparison of implant component fractures in external and internal type: A 12-year retrospective study", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 10(2), pp.155~162 (2018), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  5. Ragucci GM, "Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Int J Implant Dent, 6, pp.40~ (2020)
  6. Lee J, "Validity of a regenerative procedure for a minor bone defect with immediate implant placement : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Acta Odontol Scand, 77, pp.99~106 (2019)
  7. Clementini M, "Dimensional changes after immediate implant placement with or without simultaneous regenerative procedures : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Clin Periodontol, 42, pp.666~677 (2015)
  8. Tack P, "3D-printing techniques in a medical setting : a systematic literature review", Biomed Eng Online, 15, pp.115~ (2016)
  9. Lin L, "3D printing and digital processing techniques in dentistry : a review of literature", Adv Eng Mater, 21, pp.1801013~ (2019)
  10. Mangano F, "Direct metal laser sintering titanium dental implants : a review of the current literature", Int J Biomater, 2014, pp.461534~ (2014)
  11. Witek L, "Characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered dental endosseous implants in dogs", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 100, pp.1566~1573 (2012)
  12. Li L, "Comparison of 3D-printed dental implants with threaded implants for osseointegration: an experimental pilot study", Materials(Basel), 13, pp.4815~ (2020)
  13. Lee J, "The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration : a comparison study of three different surfaces", Sci Rep, 11, pp.10453~ (2021)
  14. Smith RB, "Classification of molar extraction sites for immediate dental implant placement : technical note", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp.911~916 (2013)
  15. Fugazzotto PA, "Implant placement at the time of maxillary molar extraction : technique and report of preliminary results of 83 sites", J Periodontol, 77, pp.302~309 (2006)
  16. Fugazzotto PA, "Implant placement at the time of mandibular molar extraction : description of technique and preliminary results of 341 cases", J Periodontol, 79, pp.737~747 (2008)
  17. Fugazzotto PA, "Implant placement at the time of maxillary molar extraction : treatment protocols and report of results", J Periodontol, 79, pp.216~223 (2008)
  18. Lozano-Carrascal N, "Effect of implant macro-design on primary stability : a prospective clinical study", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 21, pp.e214~e221 (2016)
  19. McCullough JJ, "The effect of implant macro-thread design on implant stability in the early post-operative period: a randomized, controlled pilot study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28, pp.1218~1226 (2017)
  20. Jang Tae-Sik, "Powder based additive manufacturing for biomedical application of titanium and its alloys: a review", Biomedical Engineering Letters (BMEL), 10(4), pp.505~516 (2020), 대한의용생체공학회[DOI]
  21. Trevisan F, "Additive manufacturing of titanium alloys in the biomedical field: processes, properties and applications", J Appl Biomater Funct Mater, 16, pp.57~67 (2018)
  22. Lee J, "Early loading of mandibular molar single implants: 1 year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial", Materials (Basel), 13, pp.3912~ (2020)
  23. He T, "A comparison of micro-CT and histomorphometry for evaluation of osseointegration of PEO-coated titanium implants in a rat model", Sci Rep, 7, pp.16270~ (2017)
  24. Kohal RJ, "Custom-made root analogue titanium implants placed into extraction sockets. An experimental study in monkeys", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.386~392 (1997)
  25. Koh RU, "Immediate implant placement : positives and negatives", Implant Dent, 19, pp.98~108 (2010)
  26. Pirker W, "Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue zirconia implants placed into single-rooted extraction sockets: 2-year follow-up of a clinical study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 38, pp.1127~1132 (2009)
  27. Charatchaiwanna A, "Mathematical equations for dental implant stability patterns during the osseointegration period, based on previous resonance frequency analysis studies", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 21, pp.1028~1040 (2019)
  28. Simunek A, "Development of implant stability during early healing of immediately loaded implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.619~627 (2012)
  29. Lee J, "Histologic analyses of immediate implant placement in infected and noninfected sockets : an experimental pilot study in beagle dogs", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 34, pp.575~584 (2019)
  30. Calvo-Guirado JL, "Crestal bone loss related to immediate implants in crestal and subcrestal position : a pilot study in dogs", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.1286~1294 (2014)
  31. Soto-Peñaloza D, "Effect on osseointegration of two implant macro-designs: a histomorphometric analysis of bicortically installed implants in different topographic sites of rabbit’s tibiae", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 24, pp.e502~e510 (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)