Comparative evaluation of the biological response of conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cement on human cells: a systematic review
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This review aimed to evaluate and compare the biological response (biocompatibility and cytotoxicity) of resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in contrast to conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) on human cells. Articles reporting parallel and split-mouth clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, and in vitro studies on human permanent teeth that assessed the biological response of GIC and RMGIC were included. The following electronic bibliographic databases were searched using the keywords: MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar. For the risk of bias MINORS tool and the modified scale of Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials were used. Initial screening identified 552 studies, of which 9 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Different parameters such as odontoblastic changes, inflammatory response, tertiary dentin formation, presence of microorganisms, morphological changes, cell viability, number, and metabolism were used to evaluate the biological response of conventional GIC and RMGICs. Conventional GIC shows lower cytotoxicity compared to RMGIC in vital pulp therapy procedures. Further, in vivo studies and long-term clinical trials are needed to compare these observations for pulp therapy using the 2 test materials. Trial Registration PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023426021 Keywords
Abstract
This review aimed to evaluate and compare the biological response (biocompatibility and cytotoxicity) of resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in contrast to conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) on human cells. Articles reporting parallel and split-mouth clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, and in vitro studies on human permanent teeth that assessed the biological response of GIC and RMGIC were included. The following electronic bibliographic databases were searched using the keywords: MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar. For the risk of bias MINORS tool and the modified scale of Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials were used. Initial screening identified 552 studies, of which 9 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Different parameters such as odontoblastic changes, inflammatory response, tertiary dentin formation, presence of microorganisms, morphological changes, cell viability, number, and metabolism were used to evaluate the biological response of conventional GIC and RMGICs. Conventional GIC shows lower cytotoxicity compared to RMGIC in vital pulp therapy procedures. Further, in vivo studies and long-term clinical trials are needed to compare these observations for pulp therapy using the 2 test materials. Trial Registration PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023426021
참고문헌 (35)
- Anusavice KJ, "Phillips’ science of dental materials" (2003), WB Saunders
- Sidhu SK, "Glass-ionomer cement restorative materials : a sticky subject?", Aust Dent J, 56(Supplement 1), pp.23~30 (2011)
- Nicholson JW, "The biocompatibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements for dentistry", Dent Mater, 24, pp.1702~1708 (2008)
- Mount GJ, "Some physical and biological properties of glass ionomer cement", Int Dent J, 45, pp.135~140 (1995)
- Ching HS, "Modification of glass ionomer cements on their physical-mechanical and antimicrobial properties", J Esthet Restor Dent, 30, pp.557~571 (2018)
- Genaro LE, "Glass Ionomer cement modified by resin with incorporation of nanohydroxyapatite : in vitro evaluation of physical-biological properties", Nanomaterials(Basel), 10, pp.1412~ (2020)
- Rodriguez LC, "In vitro effects of dental cements on hard and soft tissues associated with dental implants", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.31~35 (2017)
- Bajantri P, "Cytotoxicity of dental cements on soft tissue associated with dental implants", Int J Dent, 2022, pp.4916464~ (2022)
- Plant CG, "A study of the relationship among pulpal response, microbial microleakage, and particle heterogeneity in a glass-ionomer-base material", Dent Mater, 7, pp.217~224 (1991)
- Diemer F, "In vitro cytotoxicity of different dental resin-cements on human cell lines", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 32, pp.4~ (2021)
- Geurtsen W, "Residual monomer", additive release and variability in cytotoxicity of light-curing glass-ionomer cements and compomers, 1998, pp.77, 2012~2019
- About I, "Influence of resinous monomers on the differentiation in vitro of human pulp cells into odontoblasts", J Biomed Mater Res, 63, pp.418~423 (2002)
- Sandberg E, "HEMA bound to self-protein promotes auto-antibody production in mice", J Dent Res, 81, pp.633~636 (2002)
- Becher R, "Pattern of cell death after in vitro exposure to GDMA, TEGDMA, HEMA and two compomer extracts", Dent Mater, 22, pp.630~640 (2006)
- Paranjpe A, "Resin monomer 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate(HEMA)is a potent inducer of apoptotic cell death in human and mouse cells", J Dent Res, 84, pp.172~177 (2005)
- Schweikl H, "The induction of micronuclei in vitro by unpolymerized resin monomers", J Dent Res, 80, pp.1615~1620 (2001)
- Bakopoulou A, "Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of different types of dental cement on normal cultured human lymphocytes", Mutat Res, 672, pp.103~112 (2009)
- Slim K, "Methodological index for non-randomized studies(minors) : development and validation of a new instrument", ANZ J Surg, 73, pp.712~716 (2003)
- Ramamoorthi M, "Osteogenic potential of dental mesenchymal stem cells in preclinical studies : a systematic review using modified arrive and consort guidelines", Stem Cells Int, 2015, pp.378368~ (2015)
- Ribeiro AP, "Human pulp response to conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements applied in very deep cavities", Clin Oral Investig, 24, pp.1739~1748 (2020)
- Eskandarizadeh A, "Histological assessment of pulpal responses to resin modified glass ionomer cements in human teeth", Dent Res J, 12, pp.144~149 (2015)
- Mousavinasab M, "Histopathology study on pulp response to glass ionomers in human teeth", J Calif Dent Assoc, 36, pp.51~55 (2008)
- Leyhausen G, "Biocompatibility of various light-curing and one conventional glass-ionomer cement", Biomaterials, 19, pp.559~564 (1998)
- Rodriguez IA, "An in vitro biocompatibility study of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements", J Adhes Dent, 15, pp.541~546 (2013)
- Mohd Zainal Abidin R, "Cytotoxicity of fast-set conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cement polymerized at different times on shed", J Clin Pediatr Dent, 39, pp.235~240 (2015)
- Koohpeima F, "Comparison of cytotoxicity of new nanohybrid composite, giomer, glass ionomer and silver reinforced glass ionomer using human gingival fibroblast cell line", J Clin Pediatr Dent, 41, pp.368~373 (2017)
- de Souza Costa CA, "In vitro cytotoxicity of five glass-ionomer cements", Biomaterials, 24, pp.3853~3858 (2003)
- Sun J, "In vitro responses of human pulp cells and 3T3 mouse fibroblasts to six contemporary dental restoratives", J Biomed Sci Eng, 4, pp.18~28 (2011)
- Hebling J, "Human pulp response after an adhesive system application in deep cavities", J Dent, 27, pp.557~564 (1999)
- de Souza Costa CA, "Methods to evaluate and strategies to improve the biocompatibility of dental materials and operative techniques", Dent Mater, 30, pp.769~784 (2014)
- Souza PP, "In vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo biocompatibility of contemporary resin-modified glass-ionomer cements", Dent Mater, 22, pp.838~844 (2006)
- Gallorini M, "HEMA-induced cytotoxicity : oxidative stress, genotoxicity and apoptosis", Int Endod J, 47, pp.813~818 (2014)
- Stanislawski L, "Factors responsible for pulp cell cytotoxicity induced by resin-modified glass ionomer cements", J Biomed Mater Res, 48, pp.277~288 (1999)
- de Souza Costa CA, "Pulp response after application of two resin modified glass ionomer cements(RMGICs)in deep cavities of prepared human teeth", Dent Mater, 27, pp.e158~e170 (2011)
- Modena KC, "Molecular response of pulp fibroblasts after stimulation with pulp capping materials", Braz Dent J, 31, pp.244~251 (2020)