Comparative assessment of antibacterial activity of different glass ionomer cements on cariogenic bacteria
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: Glass ionomer cements (GICs), which are biocompatible and adhesive to the tooth surface, are widely used nowadays for tooth restoration. They inhibit the demineralization and promote the remineralization of the tooth structure adjacent to the restoration, as well as interfere with bacterial growth. Hence, the present study was conducted to assess and compare the antimicrobial activity of three commercially available GICs against two cariogenic bacteria. Materials and Methods: An agar plate diffusion test was used for evaluating the antimicrobial effect of three different GICs (Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, and d-tech) on Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus). Thirty plates were prepared and divided into two groups. The first group was inoculated with S. mutans, and the second group was inoculated with L. acidophilus. These plates were then incubated at 37℃ for 24 hours. Zones of bacterial growth inhibition that formed around each well were recorded in millimeters (mm). Results: The zones of inhibition for Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, and d-tech on S. mutans were found to be 10.84 ± 0.22 mm, 10.23 ± 0.15 mm, and 15.65 ± 0.31 mm, respectively, whereas those for L. acidophilus were found to be 10.43 ± 0.12 mm, 10.16 ± 0.11 mm, and 15.57 ± 0.13 mm, respectively. Conclusions: D-tech cement performed better in terms of the zone of bacterial inhibition against the two test bacteria, than the other two tested glass ionomers.
Abstract
Objectives: Glass ionomer cements (GICs), which are biocompatible and adhesive to the tooth surface, are widely used nowadays for tooth restoration. They inhibit the demineralization and promote the remineralization of the tooth structure adjacent to the restoration, as well as interfere with bacterial growth. Hence, the present study was conducted to assess and compare the antimicrobial activity of three commercially available GICs against two cariogenic bacteria. Materials and Methods: An agar plate diffusion test was used for evaluating the antimicrobial effect of three different GICs (Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, and d-tech) on Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus). Thirty plates were prepared and divided into two groups. The first group was inoculated with S. mutans, and the second group was inoculated with L. acidophilus. These plates were then incubated at 37℃ for 24 hours. Zones of bacterial growth inhibition that formed around each well were recorded in millimeters (mm). Results: The zones of inhibition for Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, and d-tech on S. mutans were found to be 10.84 ± 0.22 mm, 10.23 ± 0.15 mm, and 15.65 ± 0.31 mm, respectively, whereas those for L. acidophilus were found to be 10.43 ± 0.12 mm, 10.16 ± 0.11 mm, and 15.57 ± 0.13 mm, respectively. Conclusions: D-tech cement performed better in terms of the zone of bacterial inhibition against the two test bacteria, than the other two tested glass ionomers.
참고문헌 (17)
- "Emergency Department Visits for Preventable Dental Conditions in California" (2016)[URL]
- "WHO Oral health fact sheet N°318" (2015)[URL]
- Petersen PE, "The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health", Bull World Health Organ, 83, pp.661~669 (2005)
- Horowitz AM., "Introduction to the symposium on minimal intervention techniques for caries", J Public Health Dent, 56, pp.133~134 (1996)
- Ismail AI, "Dental caries in the second millennium", J Dent Educ, 65, pp.953~959 (2001)
- Llena Puy C, "Evidence concerning the medical management of caries", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 13, pp.E325~E330 (2008)
- Lai GY, "Contemporary approach to dental caries", pp.403~422 (2012), InTech
- Weerheijm KL, "The residual caries dilemma", Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 27, pp.436~441 (1999)
- Lohbauer U., "Dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials? - properties, limitations and future trends", Mater, 3, pp.76~96 (2010)
- Upadhya NP, "Glass ionomer cement - the different generations", Trends Biomater Artif Organs, 18, pp.158~165 (2005)
- Faul F, "G*Power 3:a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences", Behav Res Methods, 39, pp.175~191 (2007)
- da Silva RC, "Antibacterial activity of four glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 18, pp.1859~1862 (2007)
- Queiroz AM, "Antibacterial activity of root canal filling materials for primary teeth: zinc oxide and eugenol cement, Calen paste thickened with zinc oxide, Sealapex and EndoREZ", Braz Dent J, 20, pp.290~296 (2009)
- Luczaj-Cepowicz E, "Antibacterial activity of selected glass ionomer cements", Postepy Hig Med Dosw, 68, pp.23~28 (2014)
- Goldman E, "Practical handbook of microbiology", pp.150~151 (2009), CRC Press
- Sidhu SK., "Glass-ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject?", Aust Dent J, 56(1), pp.23~30 (2011)
- Cooper KE, "The effect of inoculurn size on inhibition zones in agar media using staphylococci and streptomycin", J Gen Microbial, 18, pp.670~687 (1958)