본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Development and experimental testing of a collaborative design rationale method for early-stage ship layout design

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류조선공학

초록

Design: rationale is a promising way of capturing design decisions and considerations for later retrieval and traceability to improve collaborative design decision-making. To achieve these perceived benefits for early-stage complex ship design, this paper first elaborates on the development of a proof-of-concept design rationale method. The method aims to aid ship designers in the continuous capturing and reuse of design rationale during the collaborative concept design process. Second, the setup and results of an experiment conducted with marine design students and with experts are discussed. This experiment shows how the developed design rationale method benefits collaborative design decision-making such that it leads to improved insight into design issues across the design team during a single design session.

Abstract

Design: rationale is a promising way of capturing design decisions and considerations for later retrieval and traceability to improve collaborative design decision-making. To achieve these perceived benefits for early-stage complex ship design, this paper first elaborates on the development of a proof-of-concept design rationale method. The method aims to aid ship designers in the continuous capturing and reuse of design rationale during the collaborative concept design process. Second, the setup and results of an experiment conducted with marine design students and with experts are discussed. This experiment shows how the developed design rationale method benefits collaborative design decision-making such that it leads to improved insight into design issues across the design team during a single design session.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. Aladib, L., "Pattern detection and design rationale traceability : an integrated approach to software design quality", IET Softw, 13, pp.249~259 (2019)
  2. Andreasen, M., "Conceptual Design" (2015), Springer
  3. Andrews, D., "Creative ship design", Trans. RINA, 123, pp.447~471 (1981)
  4. Andrews, D., "An integrated approach to ship synthesis", Trans. RINA, 128, pp.73~102 (1986)
  5. Andrews, D., "A comprehensive methodology for the design of ships(and other complex systems)", Proc. R. Soc. London. Series A : Math. Phys. Eng. Sci, 454, pp.187~211 (1998)
  6. Andrews, D., "A creative approach to ship architectur", Trans. R. Inst. Naval Arch.: Int. J. Maritime Eng (2003)
  7. Andrews, D., "Marine Design-Requirement Elucidation rather than Requirement Engineering", IMDC, ~ (2003)
  8. Andrews, D., "Marine Requirements Elucidation and the Nature of Preliminary Ship Design" (2011), IJME
  9. Andrews, D., "Is a naval architect an atypical designerdor just a hull engineer?", 13th International Marine Design Conference (IMDC), pp.55~76 (2018)
  10. Andrews, D., "The sophistication of early stage design for complex vessels", Trans. Royal Inst. Naval Arch. Part A: Int. J. Maritime Eng, pp.1~54 (2018)
  11. Andrews, D., "Design errors in ship design", J. Mar. Sci. Eng, 9, pp.34~ (2021)
  12. Andrews, D., "100 things (or so) a ship designer needs to know", SNAME 14th International Marine Design Conference (IMDC) (2022)
  13. Andrews, D., "SNAME Maritime Convention" (2022), OnePetro
  14. Andrews, D., "The building block design methodology applied to advanced naval ship design", Proceedings of the International Marine Design Conference, pp.3~19 (1997)
  15. Aurisicchio, M., "Rationale mapping and functional modelling enhanced root cause analysis", Saf. Sci, 85, pp.241~257 (2016)
  16. Baker, R., "Habitability in ships of the royal Canadian Navy" (1956), SNAME
  17. Ball, L., "Representing design rationale to support innovative design reuse : a minimalist approach", Autom. ConStruct, 10, pp.663~674 (2001)
  18. Bracewell, R., "Capturing design rationale", Comput. Aided Des, 41, pp.173~186 (2009)
  19. Brown, D., "Defining a warship", Nav. Eng. J, 98, pp.31~40 (1986)
  20. Burge, J., "Artificial Intelligence in Design’00", pp.611~629 (2000), Springer
  21. Conklin, E., "A process-oriented approach to design rationale", Hum. Comput. Interact, 6, pp.357~391 (1991)
  22. De Bruijn, J., "Management in Networks : on Multi-Actor Decision Making" (2008), Routledge
  23. DeNucci, T., "Capturing Design: Improving Conceptual Ship Design through the Capture of Design Rationale", Ph.D., pp.2012
  24. Derbanne, Q., "Brief history of rule loads and longitudinal strength of ships", Presented at the 15th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures (PRADS) 2022 (2022)
  25. Duchateau, E., "Interactive Evolutionary Concept Exploration in Preliminary Ship Design", Ph.D., pp.2016
  26. Duchateau, E., "Marine Design XIII, Volume 2", pp.1083~1096 (2018), CRC Press
  27. Ferguson, E. S., "Engineering and the Mind's Eye" (1992), MIT press
  28. Fischer, G., "Collaborative design rational and social creativity in cultures of participation" (2011), Hum. Technol
  29. Fischer, G., "Making argumentation serve design", Hum. Comput. Interact, 6, pp.393~419 (1991)
  30. Gillespie, J., "A Network Science Approach to Understanding and Generating Ship Arrangements in Early-Stage Design", Ph.D., pp.2012
  31. Habben Jansen, A., "A Markov-Based Vulnerability Assessment of Distributed Ship Systems in the Early Design Stage", Ph.D., pp.2020
  32. Horner, J., "Rationale Management in Software Engineering", pp.73~90 (2006), Springer
  33. Jarczyk, A., "Design rationale for software engineering: a survey", Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp.577~577 (1992)
  34. Kana, A., "Development and lessons learned of a block-based conceptual submarine design tool for graduate education", 13th International Marine Design Conference (IMDC), pp.103~110 (2018), CRC Press
  35. Kossiakoff, A., "Systems Engineering:Principles and Practices" (2003), Wiley Online Library
  36. Kuofie, E., "Radex: A Rationale-Based Ontology for Aerospace Design Explanation", Master’s, pp.2010
  37. le Poole, J., "Semi-automated approach for detailed layout generation during early stage surface warship design", Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Applications in Shipbuilding, (3), pp.37~48 (2019)
  38. le Poole, J., "The Design knowledge management square-a framework for early stage complex ship design", 15th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures (PRADS) (2022)
  39. le Poole, J., "On-the-fly design rationale to support real-time collaborative naval ship layout design", SNAME 14th International Marine Design Conference (IMDC) (2022)
  40. le Poole, J., "Integration of Aboard Logistic Processes in the Design of Logistic Driven Ships during Concept Exploration: Applied to a Landing Platform Dock Design Case", Master’s, pp.2018
  41. Lee, J., "Design rationale systems : understanding the issues", IEEE expert, 12, pp.78~85 (1997)
  42. MacLean, A., "Questions, options, and criteria: elements of design space analysis", Hum. Comput. Interact, 6, pp.201~250 (1991)
  43. Mavris, D., "A probabilistic approach for examining aircraft concept feasibility and viability", Aircraft Des, 3, pp.79~101 (2000)
  44. McCall, R., "Critical conversations : feedback as a stimulus to creativity in software design", Human Technol, 6, pp.11~37 (2010)
  45. "Rhinoceros" (2022)[URL]
  46. Minneman, S., "The Social Construction of a Technical Reality: Empirical Studies of Group Engineering Design Practice", pp.1991
  47. Mukti, M., "The network block approach applied to the initial design of submarine distributed ship service systems", SNAME 14th International Marine Design Conference (2022)
  48. Nightingale, P., "Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences", pp.351~374 (2009), Elsevier
  49. Pawling, R., "The Application of the Design Building Block Approach to Innovative Ship Design", Ph.D., pp.2007
  50. Pawling, R., "Design sketching for computer aided preliminary ship design", Ship Technol. Res, 58, pp.182~194 (2011)
  51. Pawling, R., "Marine Design XIII", pp.307~326 (2018), CRC Press
  52. Roth, M., "Analysis of general arrangements created by the TU Delft packing approach making use of network theory", Master’s, pp.2016
  53. Sun, C., "Layout analysis of polar expedition cruise ship in early stage design:by accounting for subjective preference and fuzzy logic theory", Master’s, pp.2019
  54. Takken, E., "Concept design by using functional volume blocks with variable resolution", Master’s, pp.2009
  55. Van Oers, B., "A Packing Approach for the Early Stage Design of Service Vessels", Ph.D., pp.2011
  56. Van Oers, B., "Warship concept exploration and definition at The Netherlands Defence Materiel Organisation", Nav. Eng. J, 130, pp.63~84 (2018)
  57. Watson, D., "Practical Ship Design, Volume 1" (1998), Elsevier
  58. Wolff, P., "Conceptual Design of Warships", Ph.D., pp.2000

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (56건)