본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한불 문학번역에서의 역주의 실태

The state of the footnotes in the Korean-French literature translation

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

Two conflicting opinions exist on the footnotes among the translators. While those who are in favor of their use argue that the footnotes are essential for the complete understanding of translation, the opponents argue that they are nothing but the unnecessary comments appended to the text. Among 216 Korean literatures translated into French, a total of 1,437footnotes appeared in 136 literatures and no footnotes in the remaining 80 literatures. This probably means that the footnotes are important to the translators who translate Korean literature into French. To know if there are certain vocabularies or contexts for which the translators use the footnotes, the footnotes were categorized according to their usage. Among 1,437 footnotes, those explaining the cultural terms were most common, seen in 877. Others included those explaining the proper nouns related to the traditional Korean holidays, the names of places, and the names of historical figures, seen in 392; those explaining the contents of the text, seen in 96; those explaining the terms derived from foreign languages, seen in 55; those either explaining the idiomatic expressions that were literally translated or showing literal translations that were liberally translated, seen in 42;those explaining the meaning of Chinese characters, seen in 15; and those explaining play on words, seen in 11. In conclusion, the translators who translate the Korean literature into French use the footnotes to help the readers better understand the literature they translate, most commonly to explain the cultural differences. Although the footnotes are not essential for the understanding of the literature translated, a substantial number of the footnotes are used to inform of Korean culture. Although the footnotes are valuable to overcome the cultural differences, however, there may be situations that should be cautious about the use of the footnotes,such as those containing the information that is completely wrong,those containing the contents that should be changed because of the periodical change, and those providing the information of the text that should be left in the hands of the readers.

Abstract

Two conflicting opinions exist on the footnotes among the translators. While those who are in favor of their use argue that the footnotes are essential for the complete understanding of translation, the opponents argue that they are nothing but the unnecessary comments appended to the text. Among 216 Korean literatures translated into French, a total of 1,437footnotes appeared in 136 literatures and no footnotes in the remaining 80 literatures. This probably means that the footnotes are important to the translators who translate Korean literature into French. To know if there are certain vocabularies or contexts for which the translators use the footnotes, the footnotes were categorized according to their usage. Among 1,437 footnotes, those explaining the cultural terms were most common, seen in 877. Others included those explaining the proper nouns related to the traditional Korean holidays, the names of places, and the names of historical figures, seen in 392; those explaining the contents of the text, seen in 96; those explaining the terms derived from foreign languages, seen in 55; those either explaining the idiomatic expressions that were literally translated or showing literal translations that were liberally translated, seen in 42;those explaining the meaning of Chinese characters, seen in 15; and those explaining play on words, seen in 11. In conclusion, the translators who translate the Korean literature into French use the footnotes to help the readers better understand the literature they translate, most commonly to explain the cultural differences. Although the footnotes are not essential for the understanding of the literature translated, a substantial number of the footnotes are used to inform of Korean culture. Although the footnotes are valuable to overcome the cultural differences, however, there may be situations that should be cautious about the use of the footnotes,such as those containing the information that is completely wrong,those containing the contents that should be changed because of the periodical change, and those providing the information of the text that should be left in the hands of the readers.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김경희, "한국 특유 어휘의 번역문제", 프랑스학연구, 17, pp.1~23 (1999), 프랑스학회
  2. 김경희, "문화차이의 번역에 관한 고찰", 불어불문학연구, (50), pp.625~652 (2002), 한국불어불문학회
  3. 김경희, "문학번역에서의 번역자 주에 관한 고찰", 프랑스학연구, (34), pp.5~34 (2005), 프랑스학회
  4. 김민수, "국어대사전" (1993), 금성출판사
  5. 김효중, "번역학" (1998), 민음사
  6. 선영아, "텍스트의 안과 밖- 역주(譯註)에 대한 두 가지 생각", 불어불문학연구, (71), pp.377~400 (2007), 한국불어불문학회
  7. 안정효, "번역은 보이지 않는 유리", 제3회 한국문학 번역 출판 국제워크숍, pp.22~25 (2004), 한국문학번역원
  8. 이상원, "출판 번역 비평과 번역 규범", 통역과 번역, 6(2), pp.39~58 (2004), 한국통역번역학회
  9. Antoine, F., "les titres de la presse: humour et lexiculture", Atelier, 15. Cahiers de la Maison de la Recherche (1998), Université Charles-de-Gaulle-Lille III
  10. Bensoussan, A., "Confessions d'un traître, In Essai sur la traduction" (1995), Universitaires de Rennes
  11. Berman, A., "L'épreuve de l'étranger : culture et traduction dans L'Allemagne romantique" (1995), Gallimard
  12. Henry, J.., "De l'érudition à l'échec : La note du traducteur", META, 45(2), pp.228~240 (2000)
  13. Hutardo Albir, A.., "La notion de fidélité en traduction" (1990), Didier Erudition
  14. Lederer, M., "La traduction aujourd'hui" (1976), Hachette
  15. Mounin, G., "Les problèmes théoriques de la traduction" (1963), Gallimard
  16. Mounin, G., "Les belles infidèles" (1994), Universitaires de Lille

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)