자궁경부의 액상 세포검사(Liquid Based Cytology)
Liquid-Based Cytology in Gynecologic Cytology
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Conventional cervical smears have been a great tool to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer; however, many studies have revealed significant false negative rates. To resolve this problem, the liquid based cytology (LBC) method was developed. The LBC method reduces the number of false positive and false negative smear results because LBC achieves an even distribution of monolayered cells, eliminated the obscuring effects of inflammation and blood. Although the LBC method has many advantages, there are several drawbacks. The LBC method requires an adaptation period for cytopathologists and cytotechnicians. Another drawback is the expense of the method. Thus, the LBC method has been questioned, and criticism has been raised regarding the design of the studies that assert its superiority. With a focus on the cytomorphologic and technical differences of LBC compared with conventional cervical smears, a review of the clinical and cost effectiveness of LBC, a brief comparison of two popular LBC methods, and the basic concepts of study design with respect to LBC are presented in this review.
Abstract
Conventional cervical smears have been a great tool to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer; however, many studies have revealed significant false negative rates. To resolve this problem, the liquid based cytology (LBC) method was developed. The LBC method reduces the number of false positive and false negative smear results because LBC achieves an even distribution of monolayered cells, eliminated the obscuring effects of inflammation and blood. Although the LBC method has many advantages, there are several drawbacks. The LBC method requires an adaptation period for cytopathologists and cytotechnicians. Another drawback is the expense of the method. Thus, the LBC method has been questioned, and criticism has been raised regarding the design of the studies that assert its superiority. With a focus on the cytomorphologic and technical differences of LBC compared with conventional cervical smears, a review of the clinical and cost effectiveness of LBC, a brief comparison of two popular LBC methods, and the basic concepts of study design with respect to LBC are presented in this review.
참고문헌 (30)
- Solomon D, "The bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology" (2004), Springer
- Ozkan F, "Glandular lesions of the cervix on Thin-Layer Pap tests", Acta Cytol, 48, pp.372~379 (2004)
- Lee KR, "Comparison of conventional papanicolaou smears and fluidbased, thin-layer system for cervical cytology", Obstet Gynecol, 90, pp.278~284 (1997)
- Ferenczy A, "Conventional cervical cytology smears vs. ThinPrep smears. A paired comparison study on cervical cytology", Acta Cytol, 40, pp.1136~1142 (1996)
- Papillo JL, "Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16314-case experience in Northern Vermont", Acta Cytol, 42, pp.203~208 (1998)
- Austin RM, "Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data", Acta Cytol, 42, pp.178~184 (1998)
- Hutchinson ML, "Utility of liquidbased cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma", Cancer, 87, pp.48~55 (1999)
- Koss LG, "Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening", Letter. Cancer, 90, pp.67~68 (2000)
- Selvaggi SM, "Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap test: the endocervical component", Diagn Cytopathol, 23, pp.23~26 (2000)
- Bishop JW, "Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results", Acta Cytol, 42, pp.189~197 (1998)
- Minge L, "AutoCyte Prep system vs. conventional cervical cytology. Comparison based on 2156 cases", J Reprod Med, 45, pp.179~184 (2000)
- Hessling JJ, "Effectiveness of thin-layer preparations vs. conventional Pap smears in a blinded, split-sample study. Extended cytologic evaluation", J Reprod Med, 46, pp.880~886 (2001)
- Carpenter AB, "ThinPrep Pap test: performance and biopsy followup in a university hospital", Cancer, 87, pp.105~112 (1999)
- Diaz-Rosario LA, "Performance of a fluid-based, thinlayer papanicolaou smear method in the clinical setting of an independent laboratory and an outpatient screening population in New England", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 123, pp.817~821 (1999)
- Limaye A, "Comparative analysis of conventional Papanicolaou tests and a fluid-based thin-layer method", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 127, pp.200~204 (2003)
- Vassilakos P, "Direct-to-vial use of the AutoCyte PREP liquid-based preparation for cervical-vaginal specimens in three European laboratories", Acta Cytol, 43, pp.65~68 (1999)
- Tench W, "Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP. Direct-tovial performance", J Reprod Med, 45, pp.912~916 (2000)
- Bergeron C, "Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy", Acta Cytol, 45, pp.519~524 (2001)
- Marino JF, "Direct-to-vial experience with Auto-Cyte PREP in a small New England regional cytology practice", J Reprod Med, 46, pp.353~358 (2001)
- Johnson JE, "Endocervical glandular neoplasia and its mimics in ThinPrep Pap tests. A descriptive study", Acta Cytol, 43, pp.369~375 (1999)
- Ashfaq R, "ThinPrep Pap test. Accuracy for glandular disease", Acta Cytol, 43, pp.81~85 (1999)
- Schorge JO, "ThinPrep detection of cervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study", Cancer, 96, pp.338~343 (2002)
- Belsley NA, "Cytologic features of endocervical glandular lesions:comparison of SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional smear specimen preparations", Diagn Cytopathol, 36, pp.232~237 (2008)
- Brown AD, "Cost-effectiveness of 3 methods to enhance the sensitivity of Papanicolaou testing", JAMA, 281, pp.347~353 (1999)
- Klinkhamer PJ, "Liquidbased cervical cytology", Cancer, 99, pp.263~271 (2003)
- Negri G, "ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears", Cancer Cytopathol, 99, pp.342~345 (2003)
- Chacho MS, "Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison", Cancer Cytopathol, 99, pp.135~140 (2003)
- Arbyn M, "Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Obstet Gynecol, 111, pp.167~177 (2008)
- Marshall C, "The new Pap test technologies-What is best for your laboratory? Economic and logistical effects on the cytology laboratory", American Pathology Foundation Meeting (2004), TriPath imaging Inc.
- Colgan TJ, "Programmatic assessments of the clinical effectiveness of gynecologic liquid-based cytology", Cancer, 99, pp.259~262 (2003)