Cytological Evaluation and REBA HPV-ID HPV Testing of Newly Developed Liquid-Based Cytology, EASYPREP: Comparison with SurePath
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate a newly-developed EASYPREP liquid-based cytology method in cervicovaginal specimens and compare it with SurePath. Methods: Cervicovaginal specimens were prospectively collected from 1,000 patients with EASYPREP and SurePath. The specimens were first collected by brushing for SurePath and second for EASYPREP. The specimens of both methods were diagnosed according to the Bethesda System. Additionally, we performed to REBA HPV-ID genotyping and sequencing analysis for human papillomavirus (HPV) on 249 specimens. Results: EASYPREP and SurePath showed even distribution of cells and were equal in cellularity and staining quality. The diagnostic agreement between the two methods was 96.5%. Based on the standard of SurePath, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of EASYPREP were 90.7%, 99.2%, 94.8%, and 98.5%, respectively. The positivity of REBA HPV-ID was 49.4% and 95.1% in normal and abnormal cytological samples, respectively. The result of REBA HPV-ID had high concordance with sequencing analysis. Conclusions: EASYPREP provided comparable results to SurePath in the diagnosis and staining quality of cytology examinations and in HPV testing with REBA HPV-ID. EASYPREP could be another LBC method choice for the cervicovaginal specimens. Additionally, REBA HPV-ID may be a useful method for HPV genotyping.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate a newly-developed EASYPREP liquid-based cytology method in cervicovaginal specimens and compare it with SurePath. Methods: Cervicovaginal specimens were prospectively collected from 1,000 patients with EASYPREP and SurePath. The specimens were first collected by brushing for SurePath and second for EASYPREP. The specimens of both methods were diagnosed according to the Bethesda System. Additionally, we performed to REBA HPV-ID genotyping and sequencing analysis for human papillomavirus (HPV) on 249 specimens. Results: EASYPREP and SurePath showed even distribution of cells and were equal in cellularity and staining quality. The diagnostic agreement between the two methods was 96.5%. Based on the standard of SurePath, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of EASYPREP were 90.7%, 99.2%, 94.8%, and 98.5%, respectively. The positivity of REBA HPV-ID was 49.4% and 95.1% in normal and abnormal cytological samples, respectively. The result of REBA HPV-ID had high concordance with sequencing analysis. Conclusions: EASYPREP provided comparable results to SurePath in the diagnosis and staining quality of cytology examinations and in HPV testing with REBA HPV-ID. EASYPREP could be another LBC method choice for the cervicovaginal specimens. Additionally, REBA HPV-ID may be a useful method for HPV genotyping.
참고문헌 (16)
- "National Cancer Statistics, Seoul, Korea"[URL]
- Doyle B, "Liquid-based cytology improves productivity in cervical cytology screening", Cytopathology, 17, pp.60~64 (2006)
- Strander B, "Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program: a prospective randomized study", Cancer, 111, pp.285~291 (2007)
- Schledermann D, "Improvement of diagnostic accuracy and screening conditions with liquid-based cytology", Diagn Cytopathol, 34, pp.780~785 (2006)
- Siebers AG, "Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology for detection of cervical cancer precursors: a randomized controlled trial", JAMA, 302, pp.1757~1764 (2009)
- Sahebali S, "Immunocytochemistry in liquid-based cervical cytology: analysis of clinical use following a cross-sectional study", Int J Cancer, 118, pp.1254~1260 (2006)
- Jamison J, "The evaluation of human papillomavirus genotyping in cervical liquid-based cytology specimens: using the Roche Linear Array HPV genotyping assay", Cytopathology, 20, pp.242~248 (2009)
- Renshaw AA, "Comparison of performance of conventional and ThinPrep gynecologic preparations in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 128, pp.17~22 (2004)
- Fremont-Smith M, "Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study", Cancer, 102, pp.269~279 (2004)
- Hoda RS, "Gynecologic cytology on conventional and liquid-based preparations: a comprehensive review of similarities and differences", Diagn Cytopathol, 41, pp.257~278 (2013)
- Studeman KD, "Effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of detecting squamous lesions in liquid-based cervical cytology", Acta Cytol, 47, pp.605~610 (2003)
- 신은아, "Cervical Cytologic Smears in Pap Solution vs ThinPrep: Smear Characteristics and Diagnostic Agreement", Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine, 45(6), pp.621~625 (2011), 대한병리학회
- Arbyn M, "Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Obstet Gynecol, 111, pp.167~177 (2008)
- Siebers AG, "Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology for detection of cervical cancer precursors: a randomized controlled trial", JAMA, 302, pp.1757~1764 (2009)
- Dowie R, "Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories", Cytopathology, 17, pp.65~72 (2006)
- Kim S, "REBA HPV-ID® for efficient genotyping of human papillomavirus in clinical samples from Korean patients", J Med Virol, 84, pp.1248~1253 (2012)