구성주의적 노트테이킹 수업 경험에 관한 연구
A constructivist approach to teaching note-taking skills
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Although note-taking inarguably plays an important part in consecutive interpreting, prescriptive teaching of note-taking strategies can be challenging as the technique remains highly individual and requires practice. The constructivist approach has thus been embraced by a handful of researchers in the last few years to encourage group work and help students maximize learning outcomes. This study incorporates this recent direction in note-taking research to explore how students co-construct note-taking knowledge. Six note-taking techniques adapted from Rozan – verticality, nuance markers, symbols and abbreviations, noting the idea, links and logical connections, dynamic note-taking – were used as first year T&I graduate students engaged in constructivist classroom discussions and activities over the course of six weeks. Students’ experiences were captured in the form of journals and survey, which hinted at continued integration of new knowledge with the existing ones. As students engaged in group exercises designed to encourage inquiry-based learning and personal reflection, prior knowledge was brought to the learning process, thereby enabling students to shape and reshape their own concepts of note-taking. This study is expected to prompt interpreter trainers and learners to explore new possibilities for teaching and learning note-taking, thereby encouraging new knowledge formation.
Abstract
Although note-taking inarguably plays an important part in consecutive interpreting, prescriptive teaching of note-taking strategies can be challenging as the technique remains highly individual and requires practice. The constructivist approach has thus been embraced by a handful of researchers in the last few years to encourage group work and help students maximize learning outcomes. This study incorporates this recent direction in note-taking research to explore how students co-construct note-taking knowledge. Six note-taking techniques adapted from Rozan – verticality, nuance markers, symbols and abbreviations, noting the idea, links and logical connections, dynamic note-taking – were used as first year T&I graduate students engaged in constructivist classroom discussions and activities over the course of six weeks. Students’ experiences were captured in the form of journals and survey, which hinted at continued integration of new knowledge with the existing ones. As students engaged in group exercises designed to encourage inquiry-based learning and personal reflection, prior knowledge was brought to the learning process, thereby enabling students to shape and reshape their own concepts of note-taking. This study is expected to prompt interpreter trainers and learners to explore new possibilities for teaching and learning note-taking, thereby encouraging new knowledge formation.
참고문헌 (21)
- 강인애, "21세기 맥락에서 본 구성주의의 진화 – 교수 학습이론으로서의 ‘카니발 페다고지(Carnival Pedagogy)’의 가능성에 대한 탐색 -", 문화예술교육연구, 11(5), pp.53~72 (2016), 한국문화교육학회[DOI]
- 박의수, "쉽게 쓴 교육의 역사와 철학" (2019), 동문사
- 이지은, "효과적인 순차통역 노트테이킹 교수법 -영한 순차통역 노트테이킹 사례연구를 중심으로-", 통번역학연구, 16(4), pp.169~195 (2012), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 임순정, "통역 학습자의 노트테이킹 분석 및 교수법 제안", 통역과 번역, 19(1), pp.113~138 (2017), 한국통역번역학회
- 진실희, "체계적 노트테이킹 학습을 위한 사례연구 - 점진적 책임 이양 수업 설계를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 23(4), pp.231~261 (2019), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- Chen, S., "A pen-eye-voice approach towards the process of note-taking and consecutive interpreting: An experimental design", International Journal of Comparative Literature & Translation Studies, 6(2), pp.1~8 (2018)
- Chen, S., "The process and product of note-taking and consecutive interpreting: Empirical data from professionals and students", Perspectives, 30(2), pp.258~274 (2022)
- Chmiel, A., "How effective is teaching note-taking to trainee interpreters?", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 4(2), pp.233~250 (2010)
- Gile, D., "Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training" (1995), John Benjamins
- Gillies, A., "Conference Interpreting" (2013), Routledge
- Gillies, A., "Note-taking for Consecutive Interpreting: A Short Course" (2017), St. Jerome Publishing
- Jones, R., "Conference Interpreting Explained" (1998), St. Jerome Publishing
- Kiraly, D., "A Social Constructivist Approach to Translator Education" (2014), Routledge
- Kohn, K., "Note-taking in consecutive interpreting, On the reconstruction of an individualised language", Linguistica Antverpiensia, 1 (2002)
- Lim, H., "A post-mortem of note-taking", FORUM : International Journal of Interpretation and Translation, 4(2), pp.89~111 (2006)
- Mead, P., "Interpreting in the 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities", pp.73~82 (2002), John Benjamins
- Rosan, J. F., "La Prise de Notes en Interpretation Consecutive" (1956), Georg
- Setton, R., "Conference Interpreting–A Trainer’s Guide (Vol. 121)" (2016), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Szabo, C., "Language choice in note-taking for consecutive interpreting", Interpreting, 8(2), pp.129~147 (2006)
- Szabo, C., "Revisiting consecutive note-taking: What to note, how to note, and in what language?", ELOPE, 18(1), pp.107~124 (2021)
- Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind and Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes" (1978), Harvard University Pre