Frankfort horizontal plane is an appropriate three-dimensinal reference in the evaluation of clinical and skeletal cant
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: In three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT), the cant is evaluated by measuring the distance between the reference plane (or line) and the tooth. The purpose of this study was to determine the horizontal skeletal reference plane that showed the greatest correlation with clinical evaluation. Materials and Methods: The subjects were 15 patients who closed their eyes during the CT image taking process. The menton points of all patients deviated by more than 3 mm. In the first evaluation, clinical cant was measured. The distance from the inner canthus to the ipsilateral canine tip and the distance from the eyelid to the ipsilateral first molar were obtained. The distance between the left and right sides was also measured. In the second evaluation, skeletal cant was measured. Six reference planes and one line were used for the evaluation of occlusal cant: 1) FH plane R: Or.R – Or.L – Po.R; 2) FH plane L: Or.R – Or.L – Po.L; 3) F. Ovale plane R: Rt.F.Ovale – Lt.F.Ovale – Or.R; 4) F. Ovale plane L: Rt.F.Ovale – Lt.F.Ovale – Or.L; 5) FZS plane R: Rt.FZS – Lt.FZS – Po.R; 6) FZS plane R: Rt.FZS – Lt.FZS – Po.L, and; 7) FZS line: Rt.FZS – Lt.FZS. Results: The clinical and skeletal cants were compared using linear regression analysis. The FH plane R, FH plane L, and FZS line showed the highest correlation (P<0.05). Conclusion: The FH plane R and FH plane L are the most appropriate horizontal reference plane in evaluation of occlusal cant on 3D-CT.
Abstract
Objectives: In three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT), the cant is evaluated by measuring the distance between the reference plane (or line) and the tooth. The purpose of this study was to determine the horizontal skeletal reference plane that showed the greatest correlation with clinical evaluation. Materials and Methods: The subjects were 15 patients who closed their eyes during the CT image taking process. The menton points of all patients deviated by more than 3 mm. In the first evaluation, clinical cant was measured. The distance from the inner canthus to the ipsilateral canine tip and the distance from the eyelid to the ipsilateral first molar were obtained. The distance between the left and right sides was also measured. In the second evaluation, skeletal cant was measured. Six reference planes and one line were used for the evaluation of occlusal cant: 1) FH plane R: Or.R – Or.L – Po.R; 2) FH plane L: Or.R – Or.L – Po.L; 3) F. Ovale plane R: Rt.F.Ovale – Lt.F.Ovale – Or.R; 4) F. Ovale plane L: Rt.F.Ovale – Lt.F.Ovale – Or.L; 5) FZS plane R: Rt.FZS – Lt.FZS – Po.R; 6) FZS plane R: Rt.FZS – Lt.FZS – Po.L, and; 7) FZS line: Rt.FZS – Lt.FZS. Results: The clinical and skeletal cants were compared using linear regression analysis. The FH plane R, FH plane L, and FZS line showed the highest correlation (P<0.05). Conclusion: The FH plane R and FH plane L are the most appropriate horizontal reference plane in evaluation of occlusal cant on 3D-CT.
참고문헌 (26)
- Proffit WR, "Surgical-orthodontic treatment" (1991), Mosby-Year Book
- Lu KH, "Harmonic analysis of the human face", Biometrics, 21, pp.491~505 (1965)
- Peck S, "Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces", Angle Orthod, 61, pp.43~48 (1991)
- Ferrario VF, "Distance from symmetry: a three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 52, pp.1126~1132 (1994)
- Ferrario VF, "Craniofacial morpho metry by photographic evaluations", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 103, pp.327~337 (1993)
- Padwa BL, "Occlusal cant in the frontal plane as a reflection of facial asymmetry", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 55, pp.811~816 (1997)
- McIntyre GT, "Posteroanterior cephalometric analysis of the parental craniofacial morphology in orofacial clefting", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 40, pp.416~425 (2003)
- Reyneke JP, "Essentials of orthognathic surgery" (2010), Quintessence Pub
- Polley JW, "Longitudinal analysis of mandibular asymmetry in hemifacial microsomia", Plast Reconstr Surg, 99, pp.328~339 (1997)
- Cho BC, "Bimaxillary osteodistraction for the treatment of facial asymmetry in adults", Br J Plast Surg, 54, pp.491~498 (2001)
- Rachmiel A, "Intraoral distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 59, pp.728~733 (2001)
- Grayson B, "The three-dimensional cephalogram: theory, technique, and clinical application", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 94, pp.327~337 (1988)
- Bergersen EO, "Enlargement and distortion in cephalometric radiography: compensation tables for linear measurements", Angle Orthod, 50, pp.230~244 (1980)
- Ahlqvist J, "The cephalometric projec tion. Part II. Principles of image distortion in cephalography", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 12, pp.101~108 (1983)
- Habets LL, "The Orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. II. The vertical symmetry", J Oral Rehabil, 15, pp.465~471 (1988)
- Türp JC, "Determining mandibular condyle and ramus height with the help of an Orthopantomogram--a valid method?", J Oral Rehabil, 23, pp.395~400 (1996)
- Kusnoto B, "Assessment of 3-dimensional computer-generated cephalometric measurements", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 116, pp.390~399 (1999)
- Cavalcanti MG, "The validation of 3D spiral CT-based measurements of simulated maxillofacial neoplasms", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 89, pp.753~758 (2000)
- Fuhrmann RA, "Three-dimensional imaging of craniomaxillofacial structures with a standard personal computer", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 24, pp.260~263 (1995)
- Matteson SR, "A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 47, pp.1053~1061 (1989)
- Hildebolt CF, "Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements", Am J Phys Anthropol, 82, pp.283~294 (1990)
- Hassan B, "Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo", Eur J Orthod, 35, pp.38~44 (2013)
- Katsumata A, "3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 99, pp.212~220 (2005)
- Hwang HS, "Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.779~785 (2006)
- Bell WH, "Modern practice in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery" (1992), Saunders
- Susarla SM, "Measurement and interpre-tation of a maxillary occlusal cant in the frontal plane", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 66, pp.2498~2502 (2008)