본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

패혈성 쇼크 환자에서 응급실 기반 조기목표지향치료의 효과(중증 패혈증 캠페인)

The Efficacy of Early Goal-directed Therapy in Septic Shock Patients in the Emergency Department: Severe Sepsis Campaign

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background: Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) has been used for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department (ED). In 2003, international management guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock were developed under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC); however, EGDT based on the SSC was not fully evaluated in the ED. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of EGDT based on the SSC in the ED in Korea. Methods: We randomly assigned patients who arrived at our ED in septic shock to receive EGDT before admission to the intensive care unit between May 2007 and July 2007, and we retrospectively assigned patients in septic shock to receive standard therapy between May 2006 and July 2006. The in-hospital mortality for 24 hours and 28 days, the MODS, SAPS II, and APACHE II scores were obtained and compared between the study groups. Results: Of the 60 enrolled patients, 30 were assigned to EGDT and 30 were assigned to standard therapy. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the baseline characteristics. In-hospital mortality at 28 days was 13% in the group assigned to EGDT as compared to 40% in the group assigned to standard therapy (p=0.020) and in-hospital mortality at 24 hours was 0% and 13%, respectively (p=0.038). Conclusions: EGDT provides significant benefits with respect to outcome in patients in septic shock.

Abstract

Background: Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) has been used for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department (ED). In 2003, international management guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock were developed under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC); however, EGDT based on the SSC was not fully evaluated in the ED. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of EGDT based on the SSC in the ED in Korea. Methods: We randomly assigned patients who arrived at our ED in septic shock to receive EGDT before admission to the intensive care unit between May 2007 and July 2007, and we retrospectively assigned patients in septic shock to receive standard therapy between May 2006 and July 2006. The in-hospital mortality for 24 hours and 28 days, the MODS, SAPS II, and APACHE II scores were obtained and compared between the study groups. Results: Of the 60 enrolled patients, 30 were assigned to EGDT and 30 were assigned to standard therapy. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the baseline characteristics. In-hospital mortality at 28 days was 13% in the group assigned to EGDT as compared to 40% in the group assigned to standard therapy (p=0.020) and in-hospital mortality at 24 hours was 0% and 13%, respectively (p=0.038). Conclusions: EGDT provides significant benefits with respect to outcome in patients in septic shock.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Dellinger RP, "Cardiovascular management of septic shock", Crit Care Med, 31, pp.946~955 (2003)
  2. Osborn TM, "Epidemiology of sepsis in patients with traumatic injury", Crit Care Med, 32, pp.2234~2240 (2004)
  3. Angus DC, "Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome and associated costs of care", Crit Care Med, 29, pp.1303~1310 (2001)
  4. Martin GS, "The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000", N Engl J Med, 348, pp.1546~1554 (2003)
  5. Friedman G, "Has the mortality of septic shock changed with time", Crit Care Med, 26, pp.2078~2086 (1998)
  6. Opal SM, "Clinical trials for severe sepsis. Past failures, and future hopes", Infect Dis Clin North Am, 13, pp.285~297 (1999)
  7. Gattinoni L, "A trial of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in critically ill patients. SvO2 Collaborative Group", N Engl J Med, 333, pp.1025~1032 (1995)
  8. Hayes MA, "Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients", N Engl J Med, 330, pp.1717~1722 (1994)
  9. Rivers E, "Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock", N Engl J Med, 345, pp.1368~1377 (2001)
  10. Rivers EP, "Critical care and emergency medicine", Curr Opin Crit Care, 8, pp.600~606 (2002)
  11. Rangel-Frausto MS, "The natural history of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). A prospective study", JAMA, 273, pp.117~123 (1995)
  12. Beal AL, "Multiple organ failure syndrome in the 1990s. Systemic inflammatory response and organ dysfunction", JAMA, 271, pp.226~233 (1994)
  13. Nguyen HB, "Critical care in the emergency department: a physiologic assessment and outcome evaluation", Acad Emerg Med, 7, pp.1354~1361 (2000)
  14. Lundberg JS, "Septic shock: an analysis of outcomes for patients with onset on hospital wards versus intensive care units", Crit Care Med, 26, pp.1020~1024 (1998)
  15. Lefrant JY, "Insertion time of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients", Crit Care Med, 28, pp.355~359 (2000)
  16. Rady MY, "Resuscitation of the critically ill in the ED: responses of blood pressure, heart rate, shock index, central venous oxygen saturation, and lactate", Am J Emerg Med, 14, pp.218~225 (1996)
  17. Cortez A, "Mechanism of inappropriate polyuria in septic patients", Arch Surg, 112, pp.471~476 (1977)
  18. Elliott DC, "An evaluation of the end points of resuscitation", J Am Coll Surg, 187, pp.536~547 (1998)
  19. Osborn TM, "Emergency medicine and the surviving sepsis campaign: an international approach to managing severe sepsis and septic shock", Ann Emerg Med, 46, pp.228~231 (2005)
  20. Dellinger RP, "Surviving sepsis campaign management guidelines committee surviving sepsis campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock", Crit Care Med, 32, pp.858~873 (2004)
  21. Shorr AF, "Economic implications of an evidence-based sepsis protocol: can we im prove outcomes and lower costs?", Crit Care Med, 35, pp.1257~1262 (2007)
  22. Jones AE, "Prospective external validation of the clinical effectiveness of an emergency department- based early goal-directed therapy protocol for severe sepsis and septic shock", Chest, 132, pp.425~432 (2007)
  23. Nguyen HB, "Early goal-directed therapy, corticosteroid, and recombinant human activated protein C for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department", Acad Emerg Med, 13, pp.109~113 (2006)
  24. De Miguel-Yanes JM, "Failure to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines for sepsis at the ED", Am J Emerg Med, 24, pp.553~559 (2006)
  25. Rivers EP, "Central venous oxygen saturation monitoring in the critically ill patient", Curr Opin Crit Care, 7, pp.204~211 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

고젖산혈증 또는 중증 장기부전이 없는 패혈성 쇼크 환자의 예후 분석강문주, 노성종, 서지영, 송근정, 신태건, 심민섭, 임소연, 전경만, 정연권, 조익준대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2012 · 제27권 제4호근거 중심의 패혈증 치료에 대한 최신 지견최정현대한감염학회 · Infection and Chemotherapy2008 · 제40권 제2호Early management of adult sepsis and septic shock: Korean clinical practice guidelines박철, 강성욱, 구남수, 김도완, 김수아, 박대원, 박성훈, 박소영, 박순효, 박주현, 배대환, 백문성, 서이준, 서지영, 신태건, 우아라, 유지나, 이종민, 장유진, 장지영, 정윤태, 정인석, 조광욱, 조화진, 최용준, 하태순대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2024 · 제39권 제4호Mortality Risk Factors for Patients with Septic Shock after Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundles구남수, 김무현, 김용찬, 김은진, 김준명, 송제은, 오동현, 정수진, 정우용, 정인영, 최준용대한감염학회 · Infection and Chemotherapy2016 · 제48권 제3호초기 젖산이 낮은 패혈성 쇼크 환자에서 젖산제거율과 예후서지영, 심윤수, 임소연, 전경만, 함초롬대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2011 · 제26권 제2호Association between emergency department–to–intensive care unit transfer time and mortality in patients with septic shock: a target trial emulation with septic shock in Korea강단비, 고령은, 김원영, 박성훈, 서지영, 이연주, 조우현, 조주희, 차지현, 현동곤대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2025 · 제40권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)