Application of Sepsis-3 Criteria to Korean Patients with Critical Illnesses
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background:The 2016 Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM)/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) task force for Sepsis-3 devised new definitions for sepsis, sepsis with organ dysfunction and septic shock. Although Sepsis-3 was data-driven, evidence-based approach, East Asian descents comprised minor portions of the project population. Methods:We selected Korean participants from the fever and antipyretics in critically ill patients evaluation (FACE) study, a joint study between Korea and Japan. We calculated the concordance rates for sepsis diagnosis between Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 criteria and evaluated mortality rates of sepsis, sepsis with organ dysfunction, and septic shock by Sepsis-3 criteria using the selected data. Results:Korean participants of the FACE study were 913 (383 with sepsis and 530 without sepsis by Sepsis-2 criteria). The concordance rate for sepsis diagnosis between Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 criteria was 55.4%. The intensive care unit (ICU) and 28-day mortality rates of sepsis, sepsis with organ dysfunction, and septic shock patients according to Sepsis-3 criteria were 26.2% and 31.0%, 27.5% and 32.5%, and 40.8% and 43.4%, respectively. The quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) was inferior not only to SOFA but also to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) for predicting ICU and 28-day mortality. Conclusions:The concordance rates for sepsis diagnosis between Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 criteria were low. Mortality rate for septic shock in Koreans was consistent with estimates made by the 2016 SCCM/ESICM task force. SOFA and SIRS were better than qSOFA for predicting ICU and 28-day mortality in Korean ICU patients.
Abstract
Background:The 2016 Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM)/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) task force for Sepsis-3 devised new definitions for sepsis, sepsis with organ dysfunction and septic shock. Although Sepsis-3 was data-driven, evidence-based approach, East Asian descents comprised minor portions of the project population. Methods:We selected Korean participants from the fever and antipyretics in critically ill patients evaluation (FACE) study, a joint study between Korea and Japan. We calculated the concordance rates for sepsis diagnosis between Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 criteria and evaluated mortality rates of sepsis, sepsis with organ dysfunction, and septic shock by Sepsis-3 criteria using the selected data. Results:Korean participants of the FACE study were 913 (383 with sepsis and 530 without sepsis by Sepsis-2 criteria). The concordance rate for sepsis diagnosis between Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 criteria was 55.4%. The intensive care unit (ICU) and 28-day mortality rates of sepsis, sepsis with organ dysfunction, and septic shock patients according to Sepsis-3 criteria were 26.2% and 31.0%, 27.5% and 32.5%, and 40.8% and 43.4%, respectively. The quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) was inferior not only to SOFA but also to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) for predicting ICU and 28-day mortality. Conclusions:The concordance rates for sepsis diagnosis between Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 criteria were low. Mortality rate for septic shock in Koreans was consistent with estimates made by the 2016 SCCM/ESICM task force. SOFA and SIRS were better than qSOFA for predicting ICU and 28-day mortality in Korean ICU patients.
참고문헌 (13)
- "American College of Chest Physicians", Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis, 1992, pp.20, 864~874
- Levy MM, "2001 SCCM", ESICM, ATS, pp.SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference, Crit Care Med[DOI]
- Shankar-Hari M, "Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock : for the third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock(Sepsis-3)", JAMA, 315, pp.775~787 (2016)
- Singer M, "The third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock(Sepsis-3)", JAMA, 315, pp.801~810 (2016)
- Seymour CW, "Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis : for the third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock(Sepsis-3)", JAMA, 315, pp.762~774 (2016)
- Lee BH, "Association of body temperature and antipyretic treatments with mortality of critically ill patients with and without sepsis : multi-centered prospective observational study", Crit Care, 16, pp.R33~ (2012)
- Bone RC, "Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP", SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians, Chest, pp.1992, 101[DOI]
- Fernando SM, "Prognostic accuracy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for mortality in patients with suspected infection : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Ann Intern Med, 168, pp.266~275 (2018)
- Raith EP, "Prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among adults with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit", JAMA, 317, pp.290~300 (2017)
- Casserly B, "Lactate measurements in sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion : results from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign database", Crit Care Med, 43, pp.567~573 (2015)
- Cecconi M, "Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine", Intensive Care Med, 40, pp.1795~1815 (2014)
- 박대원, "Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Community- Acquired Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study in 12 University Hospitals in Korea", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 27(11), pp.1308~1314 (2012), 대한의학회
- Ryoo SM, "Clinical outcome comparison of patients with septic shock defined by the new sepsis-3 criteria and by previous criteria", J Thorac Dis, 10, pp.845~853 (2018)